Case law

Herring-Marvin Co. v. Smith

43 Or. 315 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1903

Co. v. Cole, 4 Lea, 439 ( 40 Am. Rep. 20 ); Sumner v. Gottey, 71 Mo. 121 ; Singer Sewing Mach. Co. v. Holcomb, 40 Iowa, 33 ; Murch v. Wright, 46 Ill. 487 ( 95 Am. Dec. 455 ); Lucas v. Campbell, 88 Ill. 447 . … It is argued: Second, that there was no proof of a delivery of the safe on board a car at La Grande.

Schoenborn v. BRODERICK

202 Or. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1954

Kingston v. … Bailey v.

State Ex Rel. Pratt v. Main

253 Or. 408 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1969

In State ex rel Carroll v. … The definition stated in Davis v.

Clark v. Shea

130 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1929

Co. v. Schickling , 22 Ohio App. 318 ( 154 N.E. 751 ); Hamrin v. Thompson Yards, Inc. , 172 Minn. 536 ( 216 N.W. 247 ); Bell v. State , 153 Md. 333 ( 138 A. 227 , 58 A.L.R. 1051 ); Call v. … BROWN, J., absent.

Allen v. Hendrick

104 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

E. 257 ); Brown v. Spohr, 87 App. Div. 522 ( 84 N. Y. Supp. 995 ). 20. It has been held that it is no objection to the validity of a trust that the trustee is named as one of the beneficiaries: 39 Cyc. 36. … R. 896); Brown v. Mercantile Trust Co., 87 Md. 377 ( 40 Atl. 256 .) 25.

McFadden v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.

338 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 2005

In Gladhart v. … In so doing, the board did not adjudicate any issue in the matter other than the claim’s timeliness. The Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of the claim in 1973. See Dahlstrom v.

Hogan v. Aluminum Lock Shingle Corp.

214 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 6, 1958

Snow v. Tompkins, supra, at p 63. … Also see Night Commander Lighting Co. v. Brown, 213 Mich 214 , 181 NW 979, 980 , and J. B. Colt Co. v. Elam, 138 Va 124, 120 SE 857, 858 , wherein the facts closely proximate those found in the instant matter.

Rowley v. City of Medford

132 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1930

the 6th day of September, 1915, these plaintiffs and their grantors, under the provisions of their respective permits and applications, and under and pursuant to the laws of Oregon and the requirements of the state water board … Co. v. City of Chicago, 174 Ill. 439 , 51 N. E. 596 ); Reynolds v. Blue, 47 Ala. 711 . The resolution was not a law, was not intended to be such, and was not binding on the city of Medford.

Jensen v. Westenskow

225 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1960

This record included the field notes of the survey by the county surveyor when the road was laid out by the Board of County Viewers. … See Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Mullen et al., *192 214 Or 281 , 330 P2d 5 ; Hammons v. Schrunk et al., 209 Or 127 , 305 P2d 405 ; Latourette v. Kruse, 139 Or 422 , 10 P2d 592 and Sine v.

Jarvill v. City of Eugene

289 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1980

See Report of Board of State Tax Commissioners 15-16 (1911). Cf. Township of Pine Grove v. Talcott, 86 US (19 Wall) 666, 22 L Ed 227 (1873). … County of Multnomah, 6 Or 62 (1876); Board of Comm’rs of Jackson County v. State ex rel Shields, 155 Ind 604, 58 NE 1037 (1900); Watkins v. Barrow, 121 Va 236, 92 SE 908 (1917); Day v.

Davis v. Chamberlain

51 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1908

It is said, in Williams v. … Schaffer, 24 Or. 239 ( 33 Pac. 678 ); North Powder Co. v. Coughanour, 34 Or. 9 ( 54 Pac. 223 ); Brown v. Baker, 39 Or. 70 ( 65 Pac. 799 , 66 Pac. 193 ). 4.

Swanson v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2017

Kain/Waller v. Myers, 337 Or 36, 41, 93 P3d 62 (2004). … See Kain v.

Howard-Cooper Corp. v. Umpqua Dredging & Construction Co.

148 Or. 582 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1934

Co. v. United States Shipping Board E. F. Corp., 7 Fed. (2d) 565; Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co., 207 Wis. 209, 224, 225 ( 240 N. W. 392, 398, 399 ). … Wells v. Applegate, 12 Or. 208 ( 6 P. 770 ); Everding & Farrell v. Gebhardt Lumber Co., 86 Or. 239 ( 168 P. 304 ); Clevenger v. Smith, 126 Or. 384 ( 270 P. 501 ).

Belmont v. Black

218 Or. 514 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1959

Bryant et al v. Brown, 151 Miss 398, 118 So 184, 60 ALR 1325 . … Gamp W.O.W. v. Cole, 124 Miss 299, 86 So 802; Jones v. Mangan, 151 Wisc 215, 138 NW 618 ; Golden v. United States, 91 FSup 950); a compensation act (Faber v.

State v. Odoms

313 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1992

See State v. Isom, 306 Or 587, 591-92 , 761 P2d 524 (1988) (same); State v. Milbradt, 305 Or 621, 629 , 756 P2d 620 (1988) (same); State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 443 , 687 P2d 751 (1984) (same); see also Powers v. … See Washington v.

Lewis v. First National Bank

46 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1904

In Falco v. … The cases cited in support of the waiver insisted upon are Brown v. Farmers’ Bank, 6 Bush (Ky.), 198 , and Russell v. Owen, 61 Mo. 185 .

Fellman v. Tidewater Mill Co.

78 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1915

Henneman, 36 Or. 575 ( 60 Pac. 12 ); Benson v. Keller, 37 Or. 120 ( 60 Pac. 918 ); Wollenberg v. Rose, 41 Or. 314 ( 68 Pac. 804 ); McMahan v. Whelan, 44 Or. 402 ( 75 Pac. 715 ); Livesley v. … In Hill v.

Nusshold v. Kruschke

176 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1945

But it is clear under State Land Board v. Estate of John Gralewshi, ante p. 448, 159 P. (2d) 211 , decided May 22, 1945, that he did not have that right.

McCargar v. Federal Securities Co.

134 Or. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1929

Rogers , 47 N.Y. 233 ( 7 Am.Rep. 470 ); Second National Bank v. Grand Lodge , 98 U.S. 123 ; Pardee v. Treat , 82 N.Y. 385 ; Berry v. Brown , 107 N.Y. 659 ( 14 N.E. 289 ). … BROWN, ROSSMAN and KELLY, JJ., did not participate. RAND, J., concurs in the result. *Page 366

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Staples

259 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1971

Toomey v. Moore, 213 Or 422, 430-431 , 325 P2d 805 (1958). … The Board of Governors unanimously recommended a two-year suspension. We are in agreement that the latter is the most appropriate discipline. The client may not suffer any loss because of the conduct of the accused.