Case law

Johnson v. Savage

50 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1907

A portion of said real estate was subject to a mortgage of $3,000 in favor of the State Land Board. … Law (2 ed.), 122, 172; Baldoch v. Johnson, 14 Or. 542 ( 13 Pac. 434 ).

Douglas County Road Co. v. County of Douglas

5 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

It is true his honor, Justice McArthur, in his opinion in the case of The Canyonville & Galesville Road Co. v. … They are in substance these: The County Court of Douglas County, in term time, sitting as a Board for the transaction of county business, on the 10th day of April, 1874, entered into an agreement or contract with the Douglas

Giesy v. Aurora State Bank

122 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1927

BROWN, J. … See Form 1505, and notes; Nelson v. Brown, 144 N. Y. 384 ( 39 N. E. 355 ); Stilwell v. Hart, 40 App. Div. 112 ( 57 N. Y. Supp. 639 ); Jacobie v. Mickle, 144 N. Y. 237 ( 39 N. E. 66 ).”

Gorman v. McGowan

44 Or. 597 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1904

Kern, 44 Or. 538 ( 76 Pac. 14 ), and Good v. Smith, 44 Or. 578 ( 76 Pac. 354 ), recently decided. 2. … McGowan was a stockholder in the defendant corporation and a member of its board of trustees, but was not otherwise an officer.

Sabin v. Kyniston

81 Or. 358 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1916

Co., 42 Or. 153 ( 70 Pac. 387, 532 ); Kabat v. Moore, 48 Or. 191 ( 85 Pac. 506 ); Phipps v. Willis, 53 Or. 190 ( 96 Pac. 866 , 99 Pac. 935 , 18 Ann. Cas. 119). … The case is governed by such precedents as Phipps v. Willis, 53 Or. 190 ( 96 Pac. 866 , 99 Pac. 935 , 18 Ann. Cas. 119); Ball v. Danton, 64 Or. 184 ( 129 Pac. 1032 ); Coffey v.

State v. Stuart

250 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1968

In State v. … State v. Browning, 47 Or. 470 , 82 P. 955 . But under the statute it is a separate and distinct offense.

Fritz v. Fritz

179 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1946

Fritz, seek a decree of separation from bed and board for an unlimited time and the custody of their minor children. … Edwards v. Perkins, Or. 149; Duniway v. Cellars-Murton Co., 92 Or. 113 , 170 P. 298 , 179 P. 561 ; Coker & Bellamy v. Richey; 108 Or. 479 , 217 P. 638 ; Heider v.

Everson v. Phelps

115 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1925

BROWN", J. This is a second appeal. The result of the former appeal is reported in 104 Or. 288 ( 206 Pac. 306 (26 A. L. R. 780). … While it appears that the plaintiff rendered to the defendant a valuable service, that alone does not entitle him to the judgment demanded: Donovan v. Weed, 182 N. Y. 43 ( 74 N. E. 563 ).

EACRET ET UX v. Holmes

215 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1958

Justice Harvey in Jamison v. … power inherent in any officer of the state or any department of the state, but by the constitutions of nearly all the states, it is conferred upon the executive or upon the executive acting in conjunction with a council, board

Sharp v. Johnson

38 Or. 246 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1901

See, also, 1 Freeman, Ex’ns, § 125; Drake, Attachm. (6 ed.), § 248; Waldman v. Broder, 10 Cal. 378 ; Bernal v. Hovious, 17 Cal. 541 ( 79 Am. Dec. 147 ); Veach v. Adams, 51 Cal. 609 ; Remmington v. … Thus, in Auld v. Travis, 5 Colo.

Davis v. Hurlburt

194 Or. 584 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1952

At that time it was agreed that he would make his home with them at their place about four miles out of Eugene and pay $50 per month for board and room. … Ramstead v. Bridges, 175 Or 182, 189 , 152 P2d 306 ; In re Knutson’s Will, 149 Or 467 , 41 P2d 793 ; 15 CJS 821.

In Re Lobb's Will

177 Or. 162 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1945

Jur., Attorneys at Law, section 31; Packard v. Delfel, 9 Wash. 562 , 38 P. 208 ; Pyeatt v. Estus, 72 Okla. 160 , 179 P. 42 , 4 A. L. R. 1570. … Page, op. cit., section 829; Greenwood v. Cline, 7 Or. 17 ; In re Rupert’s Estate, supra; In re Brown’s Estate, supra. Such presumption, in the case at bar, was not, in our opinion, overcome by proponent’s evidence.

Frame v. Sliter

34 L.R.A. 690 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896

Brown, 1 Mason, 191 (Fed. Cas. No. 5441). And Mr. … Dec. 428 ); Ahrend v. Odiorne, 118 Mass. 261 ( 19 Am. Rep. 449 ); Womble v. Battle, 3 Iredell’s Eq. (N. C.), 183; Simpson v. Mundee, 3 Kan. 172 ; Philbrook v. Delano, 29 Me. 410 ; Edminster v.

State v. Harberts

331 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2000

Relying on State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233-34 , 744 P2d 231 (1987), and State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), the court held that such evidence was inadmissible as a matter of law. … Haynes v.

Postelle v. Shuholm

192 Or. 441 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1951

They went out to get some kind of board to put under Mrs. Andersen’s hand so that she could sign it. ‘ ‘Q. How long were they in there ? A. … Morley v.

Erne v. Goshen Veneer, Inc.

249 Or. 357 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1968

Riley, 139 Or 172 , 9 P2d 130 (1932); and Livesay v. … Brown et al, 116 Or 343, 347 , 241 P 59 (1925). See note in 52 ALR 2d 83 . The lien may be made applicable to such area in its description to which it properly applies.

State v. Helzer

350 Or. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

See generally State v. … See, e.g., State v.

Sander v. California-Oregon Power Co.

133 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1930

In the Augusta Railway Co. v. Andrews, 89 Ga. 653 ( 16 S. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Newkirk v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

128 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1929

Co. v. Anderson, 93 Va. 650 ( 25 S. E. 947, 949 , col. 2); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wood et al., 94 Ga. 124 ( 21 S. E. 288 , 47 Am. St. Rep. 146 ); Whistler v. Cowan et al., 26 Ohio C. C., 511. … Brown, J., concurs in the result. Rand and Rossman, JJ., dissent.

State v. Foster

350 Or. 161 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2011

State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 274-76 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986). 3 The probable cause analysis for a warrantless search is the same as for a warranted one. Id. … Brown, 301 Or at 276 .