Case law

RUTH ET UX v. Hickman

214 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1958

They were last stated by this court in Brown et ux. v. Hassenstab et ux., 212 Or 246 , 319 P2d 929 , a ease similar in many respects to the case at bar. It would serve no useful purpose to repeat such rules here. … In Epton v.

Wiggins Co., Inc. v. Fleming

123 Or. 644 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1928

In construing the above section it has been held that the trial court may strike out an amended answer filed without leave: West v. McDonald, 74 Or. 421 ( 144 Pac. 655 ); Gabel v. Armstrong, 88 Or. 84 ( 171 Pac. 190 ). … Brown, J., concurs. Band, C. J., and Bean, J., concur in the result.

Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.

166 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1941

. v. … Trade-Marks, 854, § 33; Wood v. Wood, 78 Or. 181 , 151 P. 969 , L. R. A. 1916 C, 251, Ann. Cas. 1918 A, 226; Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540 , 35 L. ed. 247, 11 S.

Masters v. Bidler

101 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1921

Smith, 21 Or. 598, 603 ( 28 Pac. 974 ); Allen v. Leavens, 26 Or. 164, 168 ( 37 Pac. 488 , 46 Am. St. Rep. 613 , 26 L. R. A. 620); Slade v. Utah Construction Co., 57 Or. 525, 534 ( 112 Pac. 433 ); Hurst Hardware Co. v. … L. 487, 489; 12 Ency. of Ev. 9; Browne on Statute of Frauds (5 ed.), § 197. 8.

Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.

333 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2002

Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc., 328 Or 487 , 982 P2d 1117 (1999) (Chase II). … See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (illustrating proposition).

Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.

87 Or. 277 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1917

In support of this contention we are cited to: Ralston v. Moore, 105 Ind. 243 ( 4 N. E. 673, 675 ); Smith v. Gorham, 119 Ind. 436 (21 N. E. 1096, 1097); Tobin v. Young, 124 Ind. 507 ( 24 N. E. 121, 123 ); Darnell v. … We cannot say as a matter of law that these cancellations required formal action by the board of directors of the defendant. 9.

Multnomah County v. Dant & Russell, Inc.

158 Or. 350 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1938

Terminal Co. v. … The case, therefore, comes under Coe v.

State v. Hale

141 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1932

O’Neil, 13 Or. 183 ( 9 P. 284 ); State v. Hawkins, 18 Or. 476 ( 23 P. 475 ; State v. Finch, 54 Or. 482 ( 103 P. 505 ); State v. Putney, 110 Or. 634 ( 224 P. 279 ), and many others. … McPherrin sitting on appellant’s lap; that Board-man stopped the car at the foot of a hill and ran up the hill through a field, followed by defendant possibly 75 yards in the rear.

Prime v. Prime

172 Or. 34 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1943

App. 344 ; Wilson v. Wilson, 186 Ark. 415 , 53 S. W. (2d) 990 ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 53 R. I. 326, 166 A. 686 ; Wilson v. Caswell, 272 Mass. 297 , 172 N. E. 251; Eddy v. Eddy, 264 Mich. 328 , 249 N. W. 868 ; Brown v. … Brown, 209 Mo. App. 416 , 239 S. W. 1093 ; 27 C. J. S. 986 § 238-d; and see cases cited in 58 A. L. R. 639, note, and 109 A. L. R. 1068 note.

State v. Olson

287 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1979

In Brown v. … See People v.

Hough v. Porter

51 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1909

Brown, C. E. McKune, C. C. Jackson, Occidental Land Improvement Co., a corporation, and E. D. … Rep. 634 ); Brown v. Baker , 39 Or. 66 ( 65 P. 799 , 66 P. 193 ); Mace v. Mace , 40 Or. 586 ( 67 P. 660 , 68 P. 737 ); Oregon Const. Co. v. Allen Ditch Co. 41 Or. 209 ( 69 P. 455 : 93 Am. St. Rep. 701 ); Salem Mills v.

Brewster v. Deschutes County

137 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1931

In Eaton v. … J., Rand, Kelly, Campbell and Brown, JJ., concur. Belt, J., absent.

Anderson v. City Railway Co.

42 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1903

Co. v. Russell, 91 Ill. 298 ( 33 Am. Rep. 54 ); West Chicago St. R. Co. v. Marks, 82 Ill. App. 185 (affirmed in 182 Ill. 15 , 55 N. E. 67 ); Geitz v. Milwaukee City R. Co. 72 Wis. 307 ( 39 N. W. 866 ); City Ry. Co. v. … its cars to be so overloaded that passengers were required to stand on the footboard, while, under the law, such an act on the part of the street railway company is not negligence per se as to a passenger who voluntarily boards

Saxton v. Barber

71 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1914

As well *234 said by Justice Grant in Brown v. Evans, 149 Mich. 431 ( 112 N. … Chief Justice Moore, in State v. Eggleston, 45 Or. 346 ( 77 Pac. 738 ), and approved in State v.

Loe Et Ux v. Lenhard

227 Or. 242 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1961

Under Martin v. … to be dangerous to persons, plants, or animals, and strictly forbids any sale or use of such chemicals except within the rules and regulations of the plant board.

Allen v. Hendrick

104 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

E. 257 ); Brown v. Spohr, 87 App. Div. 522 ( 84 N. Y. Supp. 995 ). 20. It has been held that it is no objection to the validity of a trust that the trustee is named as one of the beneficiaries: 39 Cyc. 36. … R. 896); Brown v. Mercantile Trust Co., 87 Md. 377 ( 40 Atl. 256 .) 25.

Folquet v. Woodburn Public Schools

146 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1933

Upon this last point see Haugen v. Sundseth, 106 Minn. 129 ( 118 N. W. 666 , 16 Ann. Cas. 259) ; 4 Page on Contracts, § 2243, and authorities there cited. In Meyer v. … In British Waggon Co. v. Lea, L. R., 5 Q. B.

City of Portland v. Derrington

253 Or. 289 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1969

Brown, City Atty., and Ellis E. Gerdes, Deputy City Atty., Portland. George A. Haslett, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. … Co. v.

Clark v. Shea

130 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1929

Co. v. Schickling , 22 Ohio App. 318 ( 154 N.E. 751 ); Hamrin v. Thompson Yards, Inc. , 172 Minn. 536 ( 216 N.W. 247 ); Bell v. State , 153 Md. 333 ( 138 A. 227 , 58 A.L.R. 1051 ); Call v. … BROWN, J., absent.

W. A. Woodard Lumber Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Commission

173 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1944

Ed.) 309; Reynolds v. Board of Commissioners, 139 La. 518 , 71 So. 787 . … A right to an estate of one who dies intestate is cast upon the heir at law by operation of law: La Chapelle v. U. P. Coal Co., 29 Wyo. 449 , 214 P. 587 .