Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

2.21s

  • Benson v. Birch

    139 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1932

    State v. McAvoy, 57 Or. 1 ( 109 P. 763 ); Fitzhugh v. Nirschl, 77 Or. 514 , ( 151 P. 735 ); Thomsen v. Giebisch, 95 Or. 118 ( 173 P. 888 ); State v. London, 97 Or. 423 ( 192 P. 489 ); Gary Coast Agency, Inc., v. … Lofgren, 135 Or. 533 ( 296 P. 843 ); Brown v. Jones, 137 Or. 520 ( 3 P. (2d) 768 ).

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Dowell v. City of Portland

    13 Or. 248 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1886

    (Howell v. Buffalo, 37 N. Y. 267 ; In re Van Antwerp, 56 Id. 261; Brown v. Mayor. of New York, 63 Id. 239; Emporia v. Bates, 16 Kan. 495 ; State v. Newark, 34 N. J. L. 236; Edwards v. … Jersey City, 40 Id. 176; Whittaker v. Janesville, 33 Wis. 76 ; Brevoort v. Detroit, 24 Mich. 322 ; Mills v. Charleton, 29 Wis. 400 ; Hubbard v. Garfield, 102 Mass. 72 ; Tweed v. Metcalf, 4 Mich. 590 ; Chicago v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Carson v. Kozer

    108 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1923

    BROWN, J. In the application of the law to the facts in this cause, it is well to keep in mind that this is not a case wherein there is any charge of fraud. … Case v. Superior Court, 81 Wash. 623, 632 ( 143 Pac. 461, 463 , Ann.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. v. Siemens

    68 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1913

    L., that a writ of mandamus “may be issued to any inferior court, corporation, board, officer, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or … Justice Bradley in United States ex rel. v. Black, 128 U. S. 40 ( 32 L. Ed. 354 , 9 Sup. Ct.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bradshaw v. Littlefield

    139 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1932

    W. 344 ); Tax Commission of Ohio v. Rife, 119 Ohio St. 83 ( 162 N. E. 390 ); O’Quain v. United States, 28 Fed. (2d) 350. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Shepard & Morse Lumber Co. v. Collins

    198 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1953

    Ball v. … Thus, in Poland Coal Co. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State v. Harberts

    331 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2000

    Relying on State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233-34 , 744 P2d 231 (1987), and State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), the court held that such evidence was inadmissible as a matter of law. … Haynes v.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Voshall v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

    116 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1925

    Co. v. … Coshow, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Jewett v. Olsen

    18 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1890

    Co. v. … Burten v. Wilkins, 18 Vt. 186 ; Edson v. Weston, 7 Cow. 278 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Bell v. Pierce

    118 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1926

    A. 768); Wallace v. Board of Equalization, 47 Or. 590 ( 86 Pac. 365 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid, 31 Or. 392 ( 49 Pac. 758 ).” … Moore v. Olcott et al., 105 Or. 269 ( 209 Pac. 498 ). *541 That language is just as pertinent to the instant case as to the case in which it was used.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • City of Astoria v. Douglas Land Co.

    140 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1932

    City of Astoria, 39 Or. 603 ( 65 P. 982 ); Manley v. City of Marshfield, 88 Or. 482 ( 172 P. 488 ); 44 C. J. 486, and numerous authorities cited therein. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Prall v. GOODEN ET UX

    226 Or. 554 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1961

    Berliner v. Brown, Doria et al and Hill, 221 Or 475 , 351 P2d 692 , and cases cited therein. … In Reese v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. State Parks and Recreation Dept.

    366 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 2020

    Corvallis Sand & Gravel v. Land Board, 250 Or 319, 334, 439 P2d 575 (1968) (quoting Winston Bros. Co. v. State Tax Com., 156 Or 505, 511, 62 P2d 7 (1936)) * * *; PPL Montana, LLC v. … State ex rel Thornton v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Newkirk v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.

    128 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1929

    Co. v. Anderson, 93 Va. 650 ( 25 S. E. 947, 949 , col. 2); Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Wood et al., 94 Ga. 124 ( 21 S. E. 288 , 47 Am. St. Rep. 146 ); Whistler v. Cowan et al., 26 Ohio C. C., 511. … Brown, J., concurs in the result. Rand and Rossman, JJ., dissent.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wiggins Co., Inc. v. Fleming

    123 Or. 644 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1928

    In construing the above section it has been held that the trial court may strike out an amended answer filed without leave: West v. McDonald, 74 Or. 421 ( 144 Pac. 655 ); Gabel v. Armstrong, 88 Or. 84 ( 171 Pac. 190 ). … Brown, J., concurs. Band, C. J., and Bean, J., concur in the result.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brewster v. Deschutes County

    137 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1931

    In Eaton v. … J., Rand, Kelly, Campbell and Brown, JJ., concur. Belt, J., absent.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Flegel v. Dowling

    54 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1909

    Co. v. Goddard, 55 U. S. (14 How.) 446 ( 14 L. Ed. 493 ) ; Parkhurst v. Van Cortland, 14 Johns. (N. Y.) 15 ( 7 Am. Dec. 427 ) ; Lerned v. Wannemacher, 9 Allen (Mass.) 416; Brown, St. Frauds, 859. … Jenkins v. Harrison, 66 Ala. 345, 357; Carter v. Shorter, 57 Ala. 253 ; Knox v. King, 36 Ala. 369 . In Knox v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc.

    333 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 7, 2002

    Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. Chase Gardens, Inc., 328 Or 487 , 982 P2d 1117 (1999) (Chase II). … See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (illustrating proposition).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In re Long

    366 Or. 194 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2020

    See, e.g., Ballard v. … Hosp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Moen v. Aitken

    127 Or. 246 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1928

    description of the accident is that he stepped down on a *248 two by six plank across the opening of the shaft, pulled it over a trifle to the south where he could work better, and that while engaged in taking a measurement the board … As said in Malloy v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.