Case law

Ciapanna v. Lincoln Fire Insurance

153 Or. 395 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1936

Prom McNees v. Southern Insurance Co., 69 Mo. … From Talbert v.

Crowell Elevator Co. v. Kerr Gifford & Co.

114 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1925

And also that the by-laws provide that “The Committee on Arbitration Appeals shall consist of five selected from the members of the *678 Board of Directors. … As was said by the court in Bailey v. Triplett, 83 W. Va. 169 ( 98 S. E. 166, 169 ), “The agreement of submission entered into by the parties is the authority for the arbitrators and the umpire to act.

Application of Stevenson

254 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1969

Evans v. … Brown, 250 La 1023, 201 S2d 277 (1967); Winters v. Beck, 239 Ark 1151 , 397 SW2d 364 (1965); Watkins v. Morris, 179 S2d 348 (Fla 1965).

Jensen v. Westenskow

225 Or. 189 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1960

This record included the field notes of the survey by the county surveyor when the road was laid out by the Board of County Viewers. … See Jehovah’s Witnesses v. Mullen et al., *192 214 Or 281 , 330 P2d 5 ; Hammons v. Schrunk et al., 209 Or 127 , 305 P2d 405 ; Latourette v. Kruse, 139 Or 422 , 10 P2d 592 and Sine v.

McKee v. Foster

219 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1959

. “* * * Scores are credited to the player if he causes a ball to roll into the holes on the board. … State v. Coats, (1938) 158 Or. 102 , 74 P. (2d) 1120 , and State v.

Beirl v. Columbia County

73 Or. 107 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1914

In Vaughn v. … Referring to the county board of equalization, this court, in Becker v.

State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. Appling

215 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1959

Harrison, 113 Ind 434, 16 NE 384 ; State v. Page, 20 Mont 238 , 50 P 719 ; People v. Barrett, 365 Ill 73, 5 NE2d 453 ; Tooele County v. De La Mare, 90 Utah 46 , 59 P2d 1155 , 106 ALR 182 ; *314 Board of Directors v. … The defendants were officers of the town constituting a board of auditors charged with the duty of auditing town accounts. The plaintiff sued to compel them to audit the accounts.

Dunis v. Director

121 Or. 500 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1927

v. … In Pugh v.

First State & Savings Bank v. Denn

124 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1927

.; Sink v. Allen, 79 Or. 78 ( 154 Pac. 415 ); Everding & Farrell v. Toft, 82 Or. *478 1-18 ( 150 Pac. 757 , 160 Pac. 1160 ); Bank of Jordan Valley v. Duncan, 105 Or. 105 ( 209 Pac. 149); Hill v. … J., and Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

Bradshaw v. Littlefield

139 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1932

W. 344 ); Tax Commission of Ohio v. Rife, 119 Ohio St. 83 ( 162 N. E. 390 ); O’Quain v. United States, 28 Fed. (2d) 350. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

DENESSEN ET UX. v. Taylor

198 Or. 347 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1953

Wishing to be with her husband, the 17-year-old mother decided to go to California and left the baby with the defendant who exacted the *350 following writing from her just as she was about to board a bus for California: … Turner v. Hendryx, 86 Or 590, 596 , 167 P 1019 , 169 P 109 . The husband was transferred to various sections of the country, his wife following him. Finally he went overseas and returned from the Army in October, 1945.

State v. Harberts

331 Or. 72 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2000

Relying on State v. Lyon, 304 Or 221, 233-34 , 744 P2d 231 (1987), and State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 445 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), the court held that such evidence was inadmissible as a matter of law. … Haynes v.

Wilkes v. Cornelius

21 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1890

It was held by this court in Wolf v. … The language of Chief Justice Shaw in Guild v. Guild, 15 Pick. 129 , quoted in Hart v.

Voshall v. Northern Pacific Terminal Co.

116 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1925

Co. v. … Coshow, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State Ex Rel. Bell v. Pierce

118 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1926

A. 768); Wallace v. Board of Equalization, 47 Or. 590 ( 86 Pac. 365 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid, 31 Or. 392 ( 49 Pac. 758 ).” … Moore v. Olcott et al., 105 Or. 269 ( 209 Pac. 498 ). *541 That language is just as pertinent to the instant case as to the case in which it was used.

Jewett v. Olsen

18 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1890

Co. v. … Burten v. Wilkins, 18 Vt. 186 ; Edson v. Weston, 7 Cow. 278 .

Doehler v. Lansdon

135 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1931

In Cahall v. … See Swartwout v. Railroad Co., 24 Mich. 389 ; Bank v. Stone, 38 Mich. 779 , and cases there cited.”

Hotel Marion Co. v. Waters

77 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1915

Cas. 1914B, 464); Crommelin v. Thiess, 31 Ala. 412 ( 70 Am. Dec. 499 ). 4. … In the case of Bowen v. Haskell, 53 Minn. 480 , at page 482 ( 55 N.

Lea v. Blokland

122 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1927

In Mitchell v. … Anderson, 51 Kan. 385 ( 32 Pac. 1098 ); Cartwright v. Gardner, 5 Cush. (Mass.) 273, 281; Manning v. Brown, 10 Me. 49 ; Mason v. Caldwell, 5 Gilm. (Tenn.) 196 ( 48 Am. Dec. 330 ); Church v. Ayres, 5 Cow. (N.

Haugen v. Kitzhaber

353 Or. 715 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2013

Coast Range Conifers v. Board of Forestry, 339 Or 136, 142, 117 P3d 990 (2005). … Thus, we reject Haugen’s Eighth Amendment challenge.17 17  In Brown v.