Case law

Chatfield v. Zeller

174 Or. 59 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1944

“A He was treated by being placed at bed rest — on boards — boards placed upon the mattress so it will be solid — hard—and his back would be unable to move, and he was kept on his back and abdomen so the spine would be fairly … Thompson v. Union Fishermen’s Co-op. P. Co., 118 Ore. 436, 448 , 235 P. 694 .

Moen v. Aitken

127 Or. 246 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1928

description of the accident is that he stepped down on a *248 two by six plank across the opening of the shaft, pulled it over a trifle to the south where he could work better, and that while engaged in taking a measurement the board … As said in Malloy v.

Jennings v. Lentz

50 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1908

Lowenberg, 38 Or. 159 ( 62 Pac. 647 ); Roberts v. Bourne, 23 Me. 165 ( 39 Am. Dec. 614 ); Pierce v. Odlin, 27 Me. 341 ; Losey v. Simpson, 11 N. J. Eq. 246; Bingham v. Kirkland, 34 N. J. Eq. 229; Calder v. … See, also, Haynes v. Jones, 5 Metc. (Mass.), 292; Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Lewis, 7 Tex. Civ. App. 509 ( 28 S. W. 101 ). The decree of the court below should accordingly be affirmed. Affirmed.

Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.

117 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1926

Ch. 521; Katsch v. Scheneck, 13 Jur. 668; Ferry v. Henry, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 75; Hallett v. Cumston, 110 Mass. 32 ; Bentley v. Harris, 10 R. I. 434 ( 14 Am. Rep. 695 ) (distinguishing Hazard v. Hazard, Fed. … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Gee

28 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1895

By this act the county court is made the auditing board, and the funds set apart to the different road districts are disbursed under its supervision. … App. 329 ( 30 Pac. 504 ); People v. Heed, 1 Idaho, 531 ; State v. Briggs, 34 Vt. 501 ; Cunningham v. People, 4 Hun, 455 ; People v. Harrison, 8 Barb. 560 ; Fadner v. People, 33 Hun, 240 .

Montgomery v. Multnomah Railway Co.

11 Or. 344 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1884

(Sullivan v. Board of Supervisors, 58 Miss., 791 ; Seal v. Donnelly, 60 Miss., 662 ; Rogers v. McCoy, 29 Mo., 267 ; The Mavent, 1 Sprague, 24 ; Arthur v. … (Bowman's Devisees v. Walker, 2 McLean, 376 ; Felton v. Deall, 22 Vt., 170 ; Benn v. Mayor, et al, 10 Barb., 223 ; Ladd v. Choline, 1 Minor, [Ala.,] 366; Lewis v.

Mackin v. Portland Gas Co.

38 Or. 120 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1900

In Gaslight Co. v. … Relief, § 1386; American Waterworks v. State ex rel., 31 Neb. 445 (48 N. W. 64); State ex rel. v. Board of Sup’rs of Delafield, 69 Wis. 264 ( 34 N. W. 123 ).

Rogers v. City of Salem

61 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1912

In the case of Clinton v. … In the case of Beckett v.

Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.

188 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1949

This court said: "* * * To take such an oral lease out of the statute of frauds, however, the acts of part performance must be exclusively referable to the oral lease. * * *" In Brown v. … The court then cited with approval the portion of Galvin v. MacKenzie , supra, which we have quoted. It is significant that in Brown v. Sheedy , a law action, the court quoted with approval from Reynolds v.

Foggia v. Dix

265 Or. 315 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1973

He informed the University of Oregon Medical School and Dental School, and posted notices on the bulletin board of the University of Oregon Dental School. … The judgment is affirmed. ① Davis v. Wilson, 261 Or 137 , 493 P2d 31 (1972); Kulm v. Coast-to-Coast Stores, 248 Or 436 , 432 P2d 1006 (1967); Wright v. Baumann, 239 Or 410 , 389 P2d 119 , 21 ALR3d 527 (1965). In Kulm v.

McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division

314 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1992

McKean-Coffman v. Employment Div., supra, 312 Or at 545 . … McKean-Coffman v. Employment Div., 104 Or App 345 , 801 P2d 858 (1990).

Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.

110 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1924

BROWN, J. The complaint in this case is based upon defendant’s liability as a warehouseman, for hire, of plaintiffs’ household goods. … The sufficiency of a pleading is to be tested by demurrer: Cline v. Cline, 3 Or. 355, 356 ; Staten Island etc. Ry. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 473 ( 63 N.

Pendergrass v. Fairchild

106 Or. 537 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1923

BROWN, J. — Defendant asserts failure of plaintiff to state a cause of action in his complaint, because the allegation reading that the machine— “was not well made, of good material, and did not do good work and did not properly … Co. v. Fields, 90 Minn. 161 ( 95 N. W. 886 ); Lindsay v. Fricke, 130 Wis. 107 ( 109 N. W. 945 ); Perrine v. Serrell, 30 N. J. Law, 454; Wood v. Sherwood, 161 App. Div. 335 ( 146 N. Y. Supp. 465 ).

Crowell Elevator Co. v. Kerr Gifford & Co.

114 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1925

And also that the by-laws provide that “The Committee on Arbitration Appeals shall consist of five selected from the members of the *678 Board of Directors. … As was said by the court in Bailey v. Triplett, 83 W. Va. 169 ( 98 S. E. 166, 169 ), “The agreement of submission entered into by the parties is the authority for the arbitrators and the umpire to act.

Application of Stevenson

254 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1969

Evans v. … Brown, 250 La 1023, 201 S2d 277 (1967); Winters v. Beck, 239 Ark 1151 , 397 SW2d 364 (1965); Watkins v. Morris, 179 S2d 348 (Fla 1965).

Ciapanna v. Lincoln Fire Insurance

153 Or. 395 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1936

Prom McNees v. Southern Insurance Co., 69 Mo. … From Talbert v.

State v. Pinnell

319 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1994

See State v. … State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). ORAP 5.45(2) provides that, notwithstanding such failures, “the appellate court may consider errors of law apparent on the face of the record.”

McKee v. Foster

219 Or. 322 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1959

. “* * * Scores are credited to the player if he causes a ball to roll into the holes on the board. … State v. Coats, (1938) 158 Or. 102 , 74 P. (2d) 1120 , and State v.

State Ex Rel. O'Hara v. Appling

215 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1959

Harrison, 113 Ind 434, 16 NE 384 ; State v. Page, 20 Mont 238 , 50 P 719 ; People v. Barrett, 365 Ill 73, 5 NE2d 453 ; Tooele County v. De La Mare, 90 Utah 46 , 59 P2d 1155 , 106 ALR 182 ; *314 Board of Directors v. … The defendants were officers of the town constituting a board of auditors charged with the duty of auditing town accounts. The plaintiff sued to compel them to audit the accounts.

Dunis v. Director

121 Or. 500 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1927

v. … In Pugh v.