Case law

Fullington v. M. Penn Phillips Co.

238 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1964

McFerran v. … Drainage District, 117 Kan 403, 232 P 600 (1925); Hercey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 99 NJ Eq 525, 133 A 872 (1926).

State v. Koenig

218 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1959

Lane County v. Bristow, 179 Or 653 , 173 P2d 954 ; Linn County v. Roselle, 177 Or 245 , 162 P2d 150 ; Citizens’ National Bank v. … Baker County Board of Equalisation, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hurlburt, 83 Or 633 , 163 P 1170 ; Ankeny v. Blakley, 44 Or 78 , 74 P 485 .

State v. Olsen

131 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1929

But in other parts of the instructions, which must be taken as a whole (State v. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent.

Anaheim Co. v. Holcombe

246 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1967

See also Reese v. Walker, 6 Ohio Op2d 55, 77 Ohio L Abs 583, 151 NE2d 605 (1958); Tieri et al v. Orbell, 192 Pa Super 612, 162 A2d 248 (1960); Congregation v. Kesmo Del., 82 Ohio App 282, 81 NE2d 543 (1948); Stabile v. … Also see Sweet et al v. Stewart Livestock Co. et al, 231 Or 197 , 372 P2d 499 (1962); Gordon Creek Tree Farms v. Layne et al, 230 Or 204 , 358 P2d 1062 , 368 P2d 737 (1962); Burke Mchy. Co. v.

State v. Casey

108 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1923

To the same effect see, also, Commonwealth v. Brown, 12 Gray, 135 . So, too, a joint indictment against all who participate in the commission of a crime is, in effect, a several indictment against each: State v. … BROWN, J. The defendant has filed a motion to recall the mandate in the case of State v. Casey, decided March 20, 1923 (Or.), reported in 213 Pac. 771 . For a full statement of facts, see that case.

Marshall Hardware Co. v. Multnomah County

58 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1911

Co. v. Board of Assessors, 115 La. 564 ( 39 South. 601 : 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 637: 112 Am. St. Rep. 275 ). Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. New Orleans, 205 U. S. 395 (27 Sup. Ct. 499: 51 L. … W. 256 ); Billinghurst v. Spink County, 5 S. D. 84 ( 58 N. W. 272 ); People v. Trustees of Village of Ogdensburg, 48 N. Y. 390 ; Walker v. Jack, 88 Fed. 576 ( 31 C. C. A. 462 ).

Skultety v. Humphreys

247 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 23, 1967

Kujawa v. Baltimore Transit Company, 224 Md 195, 167 A2d 96 , 89 ALR2d 1166 (1961); Colby *456 v. Thompson, (Mo App) 207 SW 73 (1918); Stahlberg v. Brandes, (Mo App) 299 SW 836 (1927); Sykes v. … Brown v.

Woods v. Wikstrom

67 Or. 581 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1913

When there is no evidence tending to sustain the plaintiff’s cause of action, it is the duty of the court to grant a nonsuit: Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co., 24 Or. 317 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Devroe v. Portland Ry., L. & P. … Marshall, 43 Or. 438 ( 73 Pac. 330 ); Millen v. Pacific Bridge Co., 51 Or. 538 ( 95 Pac. 196 ); Rush v. Oregon Power Co., 51 Or. 519 ( 95 Pac. 193 ); Galvinv. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 609 ( 101 Pac. 671 ); Roth v.

Sing v. Gribler

109 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1924

Murray v. … J., and Brown, J., concur. Harris, Bean, Rand and Me Court, JJ., concur in the results.

Elliott v. Murphy Timber Co.

117 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1926

Ch. 521; Katsch v. Scheneck, 13 Jur. 668; Ferry v. Henry, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 75; Hallett v. Cumston, 110 Mass. 32 ; Bentley v. Harris, 10 R. I. 434 ( 14 Am. Rep. 695 ) (distinguishing Hazard v. Hazard, Fed. … Bean, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Hubbard v. Lamford Lbr. Co., Inc.

209 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1956

He testified further that in selecting lumber for the scaffolding they picked out the best boards and looked them over for knots, but did not find anything “that was dangerous.” … Arnstein, 197 Or 28, 47-48 , 250 P2d 407 ; McVay v. Byars, 171 Or 449 , 138 P2d 210 ; DeWitt v. Sandy Market, Inc., 167 Or 226, 240-241 , 115 P2d 184 ; Hanks v. Norby, 152 Or 610 , 54 P2d 836 .

Crowell Elevator Co. v. Kerr Gifford & Co.

114 Or. 675 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1925

And also that the by-laws provide that “The Committee on Arbitration Appeals shall consist of five selected from the members of the *678 Board of Directors. … As was said by the court in Bailey v. Triplett, 83 W. Va. 169 ( 98 S. E. 166, 169 ), “The agreement of submission entered into by the parties is the authority for the arbitrators and the umpire to act.

Turney v. Stone

107 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1923

BROWN, J.— “Every person of twenty-one years of age and upwards, of sound mind, may, by last will, devise all his estate, real and personal * * .” Or. L., § 10092. … Potter v. Jones, 20 Or. 239 ( 25 Pac. 769 , 12 L. R. A. 161). To the same purpose are Hubbard v. Hubbard, 7 Or. 42 ; Clark’s Heirs v. Ellis, 9 Or. 128 ; Chrisman v.

Klussman v. Day

107 Or. 109 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1923

L. 716, 717, 723, and cases cited in notes; Royal v. Goss, 154 Ala. 117, 121 ( 45 South. 231 ); Fairbanks v. Snow, 145 Mass. 153 ( 13 N. E. 596 , 1 Am. St. Rep. 446 ); Dumont v. Dumont, 46 N. J. Eq. 223 ( 19 Atl. 467 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Hibernia Bank v. McElligott

147 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1934

Pacific Machine & Blacksmith Co., 134 Or. 171 ( 293 P. 417 ); Wood v. Young, 127 Or. 235 ( 271 P. 734 ); Sanford v. Hanan, 80 Or. 266 ( 156 P. 1040 ); and Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. … From Nicholas v. Title & Trust Company, 79 Or. 226 ( 154 P. 391 , Ann.

Whitney v. Crittenden

112 Or. 278 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1924

Interstate Iron & Steel Co. v. City of East Chicago, 187 Ind. 506 ( 118 N. E. 958 ); City of Denver v. Clements, 3 Colo. 472 ; Meacham v. City of Seattle, 45 Wash. 380 ( 88 Pac. 628 ); Osage City v. … A. 56); Fulton v. Mehrenfeld, 8 Ohio St. 440 ; Wallace v. Cable, 87 Kan. 835 ( 127 Pac. 5 , 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 587); Reid v. Edina Board of Education, 73 Mo. 295 ; Keyes v. Excelsior, 126 Minn. 456 ( 148 N.

State of Oregon v. Smith

198 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1953

State v. Brown, 7 Or 186 ; State v. Turner, 34 Or 173 , 55 P 92 , 56 P 645 ; State v. Bailey, 115 Or 428 , 236 P 1053 ; State v. Dunn, 53 Or 304 , 99 P 278 , 100 P 258 ; State of Oregon v. … State v. Fisher, 53 Or 38 , 98 P 713 ; State v. Dunn; and State of Oregon v. Moore, both supra.

State Ex Rel. Evans v. Kozer

116 Or. 581 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1925

Astoria, 79 Or. 411 ( 155 Pac. 378 ); Sterett & Oberle Packing Co. v. Portland, 79 Or. 260 ( 154 Pac. 410, 415 ); Ideal Tea Co. v. Salem, 77 Or. 182 ( 150 Pac. 852 , Ann. Cas. 1917D, 684); Kellaher v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Wilkes v. Cornelius

21 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1890

It was held by this court in Wolf v. … The language of Chief Justice Shaw in Guild v. Guild, 15 Pick. 129 , quoted in Hart v.

Hubbard v. Olsen-Roe Transfer Co.

110 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1924

BROWN, J. The complaint in this case is based upon defendant’s liability as a warehouseman, for hire, of plaintiffs’ household goods. … The sufficiency of a pleading is to be tested by demurrer: Cline v. Cline, 3 Or. 355, 356 ; Staten Island etc. Ry. Co. v. Hinchliffe, 170 N. Y. 473 ( 63 N.