Case law

Magnolia Lumber Corp. v. Lithia Lumber Co.

241 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1965

Stretch v. Murphy, 166 Or 439 , 112 P2d 1018 . … Wright v. Wimberly, 94 Or 1 , 184 P 740 ; Ladd & Tilton Bank v. Mitchell, 93 Or 668 , 184 P 282 , 6 ALR 1420 .

Standard Insurance v. State Tax Commission

230 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1962

Brown et al., 1956, 207 Or 222, 231 , 295 P2d 861 ; Cabell v. Markham, 148 F2d 737, 739 (2d Cir. 1945); Borella v. Borden Co., 145 F2d 63, 64, 65 (2d Cir. 1945); Tillinghast v. … Co. v.

Wells v. Great Northern Ry. Co.

59 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1911

Angell, Car. (4 ed.) §571; Woods v. Devin, 13 Ill. 746, 748 ( 56 Am. Dec. 483 ); Chicago R. Co. v. Fahey, 52 Ill. 81, 83 ( 4 Am. Rep. 587 ); Merrill v. Grinnell, 30 N. Y. 594, 609 ; Hannibal Railroad v. … Ed. 423 ); Orange County Bank v. Brown, 9 Wend. (N. Y.) 85, 114 ( 24 Am. Dec. 129 ). 3.

Cameron v. Blalock

120 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1927

He also filed with the State Water Board, as did Cameron, a statement and proof of claim, in which he asserted that he was the sole owner of the ditch in controversy. … Thus it was held in Ison v.

State v. Swank

99 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1921

In State v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Warner

91 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1919

J., § 87, p. 41; Johnson v. State, 1 Tex. App. 333, at p. 345; Dixon v. State, 19 Tex. 134 ; Gregory v. Nunn (Tex. Civ. App.), 25 S. W. 1083 ; Lee v. State (Tex. Cr. App.), 65 S. W. 540 ; Fisher v. State, 4 Tex. … J., § 88, p. 42; State v. Garrett, 71 Or. 298, 308 ( 141 Pac. 1123 ); Chavez v. Territory, 6 N. M. 455 ( 30 Pac. 903 ); Brown v. Moss, 53 Or. 518, 524 ( 101 Pac. 207 , 18 Ann. Cas. 541, and note). In State v.

Overland v. Jackson

128 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1928

We have already mentioned Leet v. Barr. A companion case to it is Iltz v. Krieger, supra. … BROWN, RAND, and BELT, JJ., concur. BEAN, J., dissents.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Boivin

271 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1975

See Starr v. International Realty, 271 Or 396 , 533 P2d 165 (1975). … Thus, as stated in Kelly v.

Hale v. Smith

254 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1969

State v. Mims, 36 Or 315, 318 , 61 P 888 (1900), and State v. Houghton, 45 Or 110, 113-114 , 75 P 887 (1904), state this as “the general rule.” Maeder Steel Products Co. v. … Knox County Board of Educa tion, 292 Ky 767, 167 SW2d 700 , 145 ALR 1333 (1942), which we cited with approval in Vendrell .

McHenry v. HOWELLS ET UX.

201 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1954

In Lange v. St. … See also Akerson v. D. C. Bates & Sons, Inc., 180 Or 224, 227 , 174 P2d 953 ; Napier v. First Cong. Church, 157 Or 110, 113 , 70 P2d 43 ; Massey v. Seller, 45 Or 267, 275 , 77 P 397 , 16 Am Neg Rep 553.

Clackamas County v. Holmes

265 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1973

Substantiality is to be determined, rather, by an assessment of the proportion which the expenditure bears to the total expenditure which would be required to complete the proposed improvement. * * Town of Hempstead v. … Washington County v. Stark, 10 Or App 384 , 499 P2d 1337 (1972); Town of Hempstead v. Lynne, supra; Board of Supervisors of Scott County v.

Bartholomew v. Oregonian Publishing Co.

188 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1950

Zeek v. Bicknell, 159 Or. 167, 169 , 78 P. 2d 620 ; Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or. 350, 354 , 133 P. 2d 599 ; Parmentier v. Ransom, 179 Or. 17, 23, 169 P. 2d 883 . … McBride v. Des Moines City Ry. Co., supra (p. 622). See Vogler v. Jones, 199 Okla. 156 , 186 P. 2d 315, 316 ; Ring v. Minneapolis Street Ry. Co., 173 Minn. 265 , 217 N.W. 130, 131 ; Clough v.

State v. Olsen

131 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1929

But in other parts of the instructions, which must be taken as a whole (State v. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent.

Fullington v. M. Penn Phillips Co.

238 Or. 321 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1964

McFerran v. … Drainage District, 117 Kan 403, 232 P 600 (1925); Hercey v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Essex County, 99 NJ Eq 525, 133 A 872 (1926).

Frakes v. Mutual Fire Co.

69 Or. 217 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1914

Constitution, as far as material herein, provides: “All losses, charges and expenses shall be paid out of a fund to be known as the ‘ General Fund. ’ This fund shall at all times be maintained by assessments levied only by the board … Wagnon, manager of the defendant, which is a mutual insurance company, testified that its' board of directors had authorized the levy of advance assessments of 70 per cent of the annual premiums of old standard insurance

Anaheim Co. v. Holcombe

246 Or. 541 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1967

See also Reese v. Walker, 6 Ohio Op2d 55, 77 Ohio L Abs 583, 151 NE2d 605 (1958); Tieri et al v. Orbell, 192 Pa Super 612, 162 A2d 248 (1960); Congregation v. Kesmo Del., 82 Ohio App 282, 81 NE2d 543 (1948); Stabile v. … Also see Sweet et al v. Stewart Livestock Co. et al, 231 Or 197 , 372 P2d 499 (1962); Gordon Creek Tree Farms v. Layne et al, 230 Or 204 , 358 P2d 1062 , 368 P2d 737 (1962); Burke Mchy. Co. v.

State v. Casey

108 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1923

To the same effect see, also, Commonwealth v. Brown, 12 Gray, 135 . So, too, a joint indictment against all who participate in the commission of a crime is, in effect, a several indictment against each: State v. … BROWN, J. The defendant has filed a motion to recall the mandate in the case of State v. Casey, decided March 20, 1923 (Or.), reported in 213 Pac. 771 . For a full statement of facts, see that case.

State v. Koenig

218 Or. 86 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1959

Lane County v. Bristow, 179 Or 653 , 173 P2d 954 ; Linn County v. Roselle, 177 Or 245 , 162 P2d 150 ; Citizens’ National Bank v. … Baker County Board of Equalisation, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 ; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hurlburt, 83 Or 633 , 163 P 1170 ; Ankeny v. Blakley, 44 Or 78 , 74 P 485 .

Marshall Hardware Co. v. Multnomah County

58 Or. 469 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1911

Co. v. Board of Assessors, 115 La. 564 ( 39 South. 601 : 2 L. R. A. (N. S.) 637: 112 Am. St. Rep. 275 ). Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. New Orleans, 205 U. S. 395 (27 Sup. Ct. 499: 51 L. … W. 256 ); Billinghurst v. Spink County, 5 S. D. 84 ( 58 N. W. 272 ); People v. Trustees of Village of Ogdensburg, 48 N. Y. 390 ; Walker v. Jack, 88 Fed. 576 ( 31 C. C. A. 462 ).

Humphers v. First Interstate Bank

298 Or. 706 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1985

In Furniss v. … If only ORS 677.190(5) were involved, we do not know how the Board would judge a physician who assists at the birth of a child and decades later reveals to that person his or her parentage.