Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.58s

  • Ritchey v. Tubandt

    119 Or. 69 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1926

    BROWN, J. … Co. v. Reddick, 139 Ill. App. 160 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stevens v. Carter

    31 L.R.A. 342 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1895

    In Crowell v. … In Warner v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Schwarz v. Lee Gon

    46 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1905

    The general rule is undisputed that replevin will not lie for the recovery of an undivided part of personal property: Guille v. Wong Fook, 13 Or. 577 ( 11 Pac. 277 ); Phipps v. … Taylor, 15 Or. 484, 488 ( 16 Pac. 171 ); Sharp v. Johnson, 38 Or. 246 ( 63 Pac. 485 , 84 Am. St. Rep. 788 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Smith

    301 Or. 681 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1986

    In sum, for 30 years after Brown v. Mississippi, 297 US 278 , 56 S Ct 461 , 80 L Ed 682 (1936), the Supreme Court granted certiorari in case after case to review convictions based on confessions to state officers. … State v. Brown, 301 Or 268, 298 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986) (Linde, J., dissenting).

    Cited 46 timesPublished
  • Foeller v. Housing Authority of Portland

    198 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1953

    Still later, the Housing Authority and a public body entitled the Portland Redevelopment Advisory Board made a survey of the three areas. … Board of Commissioners of Jersey City et al., 137 N.J.L. 356 , 59 A2d 641 ; In re Opinion to the Governor, R.I., 69 A.2d 531 ; General Development Corp. v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Adelsperger v. Elkside Development LLC

    373 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 1, 2025

    Knepper v. Brown, 345 Or 320, 323, 195 P3d 383 (2008); see also Woodbury v. … See Brown v. J.C.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Hoy v. Biladeau

    110 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1924

    Under the doctrine stated in Pearce v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Kergil v. Central Oregon Fir Supply Co.

    213 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1958

    Later, in Hendrickson v. … See Graham v. Savage, 110 Minn 510, 126 *192 NW 394; Higby v. Hooper, 124 Mont 331 , 221 P2d 1043 ; Supreme Lodge K. of P. v. Dalzell, 205 Mo App 207, 223 SW 786 ; Gagnon v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Hammagren v. Wald Construction, Inc.

    274 Or. 267 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 12, 1976

    Swift v. Mulkey, 14 Or 59, 65 , 12 P 76 (1886); Knahtla v. O.S.L.R. Co., 21 Or 136, 152-54 , 27 P 91 (1891); Herrlin v. Brown & McCabe, 71 Or 470, 475 , 142 P 772 (1914) ; Rennewanz v. … Fulton Ins. v. White Motor Corp., 261 Or 206, 223 , 493 P2d 138 (1972); Rhodes v. Moore, 239 Or 454, 456 , 398 P2d 189 (1965). Affirmed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Shefler

    77 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1915

    he received the remainder paid to Proudfoot, although it appears in the record that Brown was in the courtroom. … The attorneys who prepared the complaint for Eldriedge in the case of Swastika Farms Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Conn v. Oregon Electric Ry. Co.

    137 Or. 75 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1930

    *79 BROWN, J. … A., 1915F, 1151); Cathcart v. Oregon-W. R. & N. Co., 86 Or; 250 ( 168 P. 308 ); Robison v. Oregon-W. R. & N. Co., 90 Or. 490 ( 176 P. 594 ); Olds v. Hines, 95 Or. 580 ( 187 P. 586 , 188 P. 716 ); Morser v. Southern Pac.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Liebe v. Battmann

    33 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1898

    It was held in Caldwell v. … W. 814 ); Board of Sup’rs v. Auditor General, 68 Mich. 659 -665 ( 36 N. W. 794 ); Gano v. Fisk, 43 Ohio St. 462 ( 54 Am. Rep. 819 , 3 N. E. 532 ).

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • MacDonald v. Lane

    49 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1907

    Rep. 134 ) ; Beers v. Dalles City 16 Or. 334 ( 18 Pac. 835 ). 2. … In People ex rel. v. Roberts, 148 N Y. 360 (31 L. R. A. 399: 42 N.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Masters

    120 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1926

    Rep. 474 ); State v. Cox, 91 Or. 518 ( 179 Pac. 575 ); State v. Moss, 95 Or. 616 ( 182 Pac. 149 , 188 Pac. 702 ); State v. Brock, 112 Or. 59 ( 228 Pac. 920 ); State v. Buoy, 113 Or. 217 ( 232 Pac. 623 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnston v. Barrills

    27 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1895

    J., in Black v. … In People v. Board of Poliee, 75 N. Y. 89 , Miller, J., in defining one of the terms, says: “Employes are usually considered as embracing laborers and servants, and those occupying inferior positions.”

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Pelton v. Gold Hill Canal Co.

    72 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1914

    Chief Justice Bean in the case of Savage v. Salem Mills Co., 48 Or. 1 . ( 85 Pac. 69 ,10 Ann. … Co. v. Foster, 76 Iowa, 535 ( 41 N. W. 212 ); Branch v. Roberts, 50 Barb. (N. Y.) 435. 3.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Fletcher

    24 Or. 295 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

    Brown, and other witnesses, that the said A. J. … Enc. 866, and authorities cited; State v. Beaudet, 53 Conn. 536 ; Woolfolk v. State, 81 Ga. 551 ; S. C. 85 Ga. 69 ; State v. Bishop, 73 N. C. 44 ; Rhea v.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Ruth v. Cox

    134 Or. 200 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1930

    *203 BROWN, J. … Supporting this doctrine see Varnum v. State, 78 Ala. 30 ; Paden v. Bellinger, 87 Ala. 575 ( 6 So. 351 ); McCarty v. Blevins, 5 Yerg. (Tenn.) 195 ( 26 Am. Dec. 262 ); Minnesota Linseed Oil Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Amato v. Amato's Supper Club, Inc.

    269 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1974

    Also, the minutes of the first meeting of the new Board of Directors composed of the purchasers, which was held at the time of signing the papers consummating the sale, contained the following provision: “SALLY BAKER pointed … The quantum of proof required to sustain reformation was stated in Mignot v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Tooze v. Heighton

    79 Or. 545 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1916

    Browne, 55 Or. 316, 321 ( 106 Pac. 331 ). 3. Stated in general terms, a defendant may plead anything which shows that the plaintiff ought not to recover. … In Dose v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.