Case law

Sweeney v. Jackson County

93 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1919

Board of County Commissioners of Jackson County, 8 Or. 529 , 9 Or. 470 ; Rice v. Wallowa County, 46 Or. 574 ( 81 Pac. 358 ); Ridings v. Marion County, 50 Or. 30 ( 91 Pac. 22 ); Bailey v. … This is now well settled beyond controversy: Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron Works, 166 Fed. 403, 405 ( 93 C. C. A. 162 ); Kihlberg v. United States, 97 U. S. 398 ( 24 L. Ed. 1106 ); Sweeney v.

Save Our Rural Oregon v. Energy Facility Siting Council

339 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 2005

Council’s Interpretation and Petitioners’ Objections In this proceeding, the council appointed the Klamath County Board of Commissioners (county board) as the “special advisory group” and requested that the county board recommend … See also Columbia Steel Castings Co. v.

Blundell v. Pugh

123 Or. 563 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1927

BROWN, J. … In the case of Finlayson v. Finlayson, 17 Or. 347, 356 ( 11 Am. St. Rep. 836 , 3 L. R.

State v. Ramoz

367 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 17, 2021

See State v. … Brown, 310 Or at 356.

State v. Gilbert

281 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1978

State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 497 P2d 1191 (1972), and State v. Boyd, supra ( 271 Or 558 ), are not involved. … Quoted in State v. Welch, 264 Or 388, 391 , 505 P2d 910 (1973). State v. Woolard, 259 Or 232 , 484 P2d 314 , 485 P2d 1194 (1971), is an example.

American Soda Fountain Co. v. Medford Grocery Co.

128 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1927

In Wallis v. Russell, 2 Ir. … Bean, Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

Houston v. Timmerman

4 L.R.A. 716 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1889

(Eyster v. Gaff, 91 U. S. 521 ; Grant v. Bennett, 96 Ill. 513 ; Randall v. Lowe, 98 Ind. 261 ; Daniels v. Henderson, 49 Cal. 242 ; Blanchard v. Ware, 43 Iowa, 530 ; Carr v. Lewis, 15 Mo. App. 551 ; Currie v. … Jur., see. 196; Brightman v. Brightman, 1 R. S. 112; Isler v. Brown, 66 N. C. 556 ; Almond v. Almond, 4. Rand. 662; 15 Am.

Rugenstein v. Ottenheimer

70 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1914

Justice Brown in Galveston etc. Ry. Co. v. Powers, 101 Tex. 161, 164 ( 105 S. … Justice Moore, in Patty v.

Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star Insurance

172 Or. 91 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1943

Harrington v. Portland Traction Co., 168 Or. 548, 551 , 124 P. (2d) 715 ; Gentner v. Kern, 164 Or. 645, 661 , 103 P. (2d) 721 ; Maneff v. Lamer, 152 Or. 619, 624 , 54 P. (2d) 287 ; Hanks v. … It is addressed to Captain Tucker, Board of Marine Underwriters, and Addison P. Knapp Co., insurance agent, and reads: “Str. ‘The Dalles’ left Portland at 11:25 A. M.

Jaloff v. United Auto Indemnity Exchange

121 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1926

BROWN, J. The defendants contend that the trial court erred in admitting as evidence the judgment-roll in a former case between the parties hereto. … Ency. of Proc., p. 39; Long Creek Building Assn. v. State Ins. Co., 29 Or. 569 ( 46 Pac. 366 ); Han-nan v. Greenfield, 36 Or. 97 ( 58 Pac. 888 ); Young v. Stickney, 46 Or. 101 ( 79 Pac. 345 ). In Waller v.

Lent v. Title & Trust Co.

137 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1931

Quoted with approval in Shelton v. King, 229 U. S. 90 , ( 57 L. Ed. 1086 , 33 S. Ct. 686 ). Also see Rhoads, Executor, v. Rhoads et al., 43 Ill. 239 . In the case of Claflin v. … J., Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

McGilchrist v. F. W. Woolworth Co.

138 Or. 679 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1932

In Smith v. … J., Brown and Rossman, JJ., concur.

Humphers v. First Interstate Bank

298 Or. 706 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1985

In Furniss v. … If only ORS 677.190(5) were involved, we do not know how the Board would judge a physician who assists at the birth of a child and decades later reveals to that person his or her parentage.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Ellis

356 Or. 691 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 2015

See also State ex rel Currin v. … United States v.

Woodard v. A. F. Coats Lumber Co.

97 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1920

Some of the crew of the Wisconsin were on board of her, but took no part in' the management of the enterprise. While in tow, the flying-jib boom of the ship struck a lighter laden with flour, and capsized her. … For example, as shown in Sturgis v. Boyer, 65 U. S. 110 ( 16 L.

Cameron v. Blalock

120 Or. 237 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1927

He also filed with the State Water Board, as did Cameron, a statement and proof of claim, in which he asserted that he was the sole owner of the ditch in controversy. … Thus it was held in Ison v.

Liebe v. Battmann

33 Or. 241 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 13, 1898

It was held in Caldwell v. … W. 814 ); Board of Sup’rs v. Auditor General, 68 Mich. 659 -665 ( 36 N. W. 794 ); Gano v. Fisk, 43 Ohio St. 462 ( 54 Am. Rep. 819 , 3 N. E. 532 ).

State Ex Inf. Moore v. Farnham

114 Or. 32 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1925

Duniway, 63 Or. 555 ( 128 Pac. 853 ); State ex rel. v. Holman, 68 Or. 546 ( 137 Pac. 771 ); Gibson v. Kay, 68 Or. 589 ( 137 Pac. 864 ); Baskin v. Marion County, 70 Or. 363 ( 141 Pac. 1014 ); State ex Inf. v. … Holman, 73 Or. 18 ( 144 Pac. 429 ); Phy v. Wright, 75 Or. 428 ( 146 Pac. 138 ); Yeaton v. Barnhart, 78 Or. 249 ( 152 Pac. 1192 ); Webster v. Boyer, 81 Or. 485 ( 159 Pac. 1166 , Ann. Cas. 1918D, 988).

Clyde Et Ux v. Walker Et Ux

220 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1960

Co. v. … Brown et al., 2 F2d 797. The facts of this case disclose that shortly after the deed was executed plaintiffs became dissatisfied with the transaction and contacted Hugh M.

Gilbertson v. McLEAN

216 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1959

. *632 “V. … Small v.