Case law

Browning v. Terminal Ice & Cold Storage Co.

227 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1961

227 Or. 36 (1961) 360 P.2d 630 BROWNING v. TERMINAL ICE & COLD STORAGE COMPANY Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued January 12, 1961. Affirmed March 22, 1961. Petition for rehearing denied April 18, 1961. *37 Glenn R. … Thomas v.

Stovall v. State of Oregon

324 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 29, 1996

In Hughes v. … See Ragsdale v.

Kergil v. Central Oregon Fir Supply Co.

213 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1958

Later, in Hendrickson v. … See Graham v. Savage, 110 Minn 510, 126 *192 NW 394; Higby v. Hooper, 124 Mont 331 , 221 P2d 1043 ; Supreme Lodge K. of P. v. Dalzell, 205 Mo App 207, 223 SW 786 ; Gagnon v.

Morton v. Hood River County

88 Or. 144 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1918

That such a description is sufficient is settled in this state by Nelson v. Yamhill County, 41 Or. 560 ( 69 Pac. 678 ). … Co. v. Kroeger, 17 Idaho, 384 ( 105 Pac. 1070 ). We express *149 no opinion as to the efficacy of such a remedy here, as the matter is not before us. 10,11.

State v. Warner Valley Stock Co.

68 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1914

In Jackson v. … See, also, on this point, Brown v. Baker, 39 Or. 71 ( 65 Pac. 799 , 66 Pac. 193 ); Hermann v. Hutcheson, 33 Or. 239 ( 53 Pac. 489 ).

Douglas County Road Co. v. Canyonville & Galesville Road Co.

8 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1879

that the appellant in August, 1873, became an organized corporation by electing directors, and soon thereafter caused their road through the canyon to be laid out, surveyed, and located, which survey was adopted by the board … Co. v. County of Middlesex, 7 Met. 78 ; and in the case of Boston Bridge Petitioners v. County of Middlesex, 10 Pick. 269 ; Abb. Dig. Law of Corp. 626, sec. 239.

McCann v. Rosenblum

355 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2014

Relying on Bernard v. … Compare Sizemore v.

Howard v. Foster & Kleiser Co.

217 Or. 516 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1958

In Schmidt v. … Robbins v.

Livesay v. Lee Hing

139 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1932

Hearne v. Allen, Cro. Car. 57. Hutton 55. Gulliver v. Poyntz, 4 Wilson 141 . … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Hantke v. Harris Ice Machine Works

152 Or. 564 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1936

Company v. LaLonde, 108 Tex. 67 ( 184 S. W. 498 ); Peres v. Atchison T. & S. F. Ry. Co., 192 S. W. 274 . … E. 775 ), where the employee was carrying samples and money of his employer; and Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 104 Cal.

Nesbitt v. Myers

336 Or. 526 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2004

Presently, if unionized public employees wish to change or terminate their union representation, a significant number of their membership affirmatively must seek to do so by petitioning the Employment Relations Board (ERB … Sampson v. Roberts, 309 Or 335, 339 , 788 P2d 421 (1990). In this instance, the text of the proposed measure contains nothing that would alter current Oregon law regarding the initiation of union representation.

State v. Marco

93 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1919

industrious counsel, representing both plaintiff and defendant, we have succeeded in discovering but one authority which throws any light upon the problem thus presented, and that is the ease of the Ship Frederick Gerring Jr. v. … and if any one on board could be found bold enough to affirm that she was not ‘fishing,’ that that operation was completed hours before, when the seine was pursed up and the mackerel therein enclosed, would he not be set

Marshall v. Middleton

100 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1920

In Wilts v. Wilts, 151 Iowa, 149 ( 130 N. W. 906 ), the encumbrance was one created by the testator. The same condition existed in the case of Brown v. Baron, 162 Mass. 56 ( 37 N. E. 772 , 44 Am. St. … In Miles v. Miles, 6 Or. 266 ( 25 Am.

MacDonald v. Lane

49 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1907

Rep. 134 ) ; Beers v. Dalles City 16 Or. 334 ( 18 Pac. 835 ). 2. … In People ex rel. v. Roberts, 148 N Y. 360 (31 L. R. A. 399: 42 N.

Pelton v. Gold Hill Canal Co.

72 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 1914

Chief Justice Bean in the case of Savage v. Salem Mills Co., 48 Or. 1 . ( 85 Pac. 69 ,10 Ann. … Co. v. Foster, 76 Iowa, 535 ( 41 N. W. 212 ); Branch v. Roberts, 50 Barb. (N. Y.) 435. 3.

Baker v. First National Bank

206 Or. 434 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1956

Rose v. Wollenberg, 36 Or 154, 158 , 59 P 190 . … Gall v. Gall, 27 App. Div. 173 , 50 N.Y.S. 563 ; Robinson v. Raynor, 28 N.Y. 494 ; Shakespeare v. Markham, 10 Hun. (N.Y.) 311, affirmed 72 N.Y. 400 ; Miller v. Lash 85 N.C. 51 , 39 Am. Rep. 678 .”

Callender Nav. Co. v. Pomeroy

61 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1912

In Harrison v. … Patterson, 2 Or. 49 , and Rafferty v. Davis, 54 Or. 77 ( 102 Pac. 305 ). Whether Section 6709, L. O. L., has so far modified the doctrine of Hopwood v.

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Ohlsen

192 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1951

In Lankton v. … Lundin v.

Wiggins v. HENDRICKSON ET UX.

191 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1951

See Hanna v. Hope, 86 Or. 303, 310 , 168 P. 618 ; Gabel v. Armstrong, 88 Or. 84, 89 , 171 P. 190 ; Hattrem v. Burdick et al., 138 Or. 660 , 6 P. 2d 18 . In Gabel v. … They did, however, use a three-quarter inch fir siding but it had your two inch strips between each board so as to get a blind nailing, or nailing where this stuff is installed with direct face nailing and the result is if

In Re Determination of Water Rights of Owyhee River

124 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1927

Hartley, 111 Or. 308 ( 226 Pac. 436 ); Taughenbaugh v. Clark, 6 Colo. App. 235 ( 40 Pac. 153 ); Weaver v. Eureka Ditch Co., 15 Cal. 271 ; Seaward v. … Brown and Eufus M. Dinwiddie are respondents as to other findings. The only question involved in the appeal to this court in contest No. 2 is that of priority.