Case law

George H. Buckler Co. v. American Metallic Chemical Corp.

214 Or. 639 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1958

In Coast Engine and Machine Works v. … In the early English case of Blake v.

Carroll v. Bowne

55 Or. 316 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1910

Hatcher v. Briggs, 6 Or. 31, 40 . No facts are stated in the complaint, which tend in any degree to defeat Bowne’s right to recover upon the note. … The case of Manning v. Gasharie, 27 Ind. 399 , is somewhat in point.

State v. Duggan

290 Or. 369 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1981

Andersen v. Peden, 284 Or. 313, 324 , 587 P.2d 59 (1978). … Tharalson v. Dept. of Revenue, 281 Or. 9, 13 , 573 P.2d 298 (1978).

Mathews v. Chambers Power Co.

81 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1916

Rep. 342 ); Allen v. Dunlap, 24 Or. 229 ( 33 Pac. 675 ); Mendenhall v. Harrisburg Water Co., 27 Or. 38 ( 39 Pac. 399 ); Union Power Co. v. Lichty, 42 Or. 563 ( 71 Pac. 1044 ); Moore v. … Krimbel, 28 Or. 271 ( 42 Pac. 995 ); Goldsmith v. Elwert, 31 Or. 539 ( 50 Pac. 867 ); Board of Regents v. Hutchinson, 46 Or. 57 ( 78 Pac. 1028 ); McCoy v. Crossfield, 54 Or. 591 ( 104 Pac. 423 ); Bank of Commerce v.

Eaton v. Mimnaugh

43 Or. 465 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1903

A distinction was at one time made by the Supreme Court of Missouri between debts voluntarily incurred by a county, such as for the improvement of the courthouse, and those the law required it to incur, as for the board of … One of the counties of the state issued warrants in excess of the constitutional limit for the ordinary expenses of the county, such as witness and juror fees, election costs, charges for board of prisoners, county treasurer

City University v. Office of Educ. Policy

320 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1994

City University v. Oregon Office of Educ. Policy, 126 Or App 459, 466 , 870 P2d 222 (1994). … Gilliam County v. Dept. of Environmental Quality, 316 Or 99, 108 , 849 P2d 500 (1993), rev’d on other grounds sub nom Oregon Waste Systems v. Dept. of Env. Quality,_US _, 114 S Ct 1345 , 128 L Ed 2d 12 (1994).

Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

180 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1946

Comm. , 117 Or. 406 , 244 P. 317 ; Johnson v. Prineville , 100 Or. 105 , 196 P. 821 ; Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co. , supra; Memphis Trust Co. v. Brown-Ketchum Iron *Page 159 Works , 166 F. 398 ; Thornton v. … In view of the express authority to sue, the court very naturally construed the provision that the decision of the board of directors should be "final," as meaning only final within the order.

In re Long

368 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2021

Mitchell’s former employer and, in early 2017, hired respondent to pursue an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board. … See, e.g., Shearer’s Foods v.

Carstens Packing Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.

134 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1930

Co. v. Schaefer, 47 Ind.App. 371 ( 90 N.E. 502 ); San Antonio U. & G. Ry. Co. v. Storey et al., (Tex.) 172 S. W. 188 . … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ. concur.

Couey v. Atkins

357 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2015

Couey v. Brown, 257 Or App 434, 306 P3d 778 (2013). … TVKO v. Howland, 335 Or 527, 534, 73 P3d 905 (2003); see also Brown v.

Stein v. Handy

212 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1957

In Snyder v. … In Lyons v.

Preble v. Hanna

117 Or. 306 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1926

An instructing case and one very similar to the instant case is Hughes v. Coors, 3 Colo. App. 303 ( 33 Pac. 77 ). See, also, Gregory v. Oregon Fruit Juice Co., 84 Or. 201 , 202 ( 164 Pac. 728 ); Budd v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

ROHNER ET UX v. Neville

230 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1961

Hirt v. Entus, 37 Wash2d 418, 224 P2d 620 ; Brown v. Wilson, 348 Mo 658, 155 SW2d 176 ; 4 Tiffany, The Law of Real Property (3d ed, 1939) § 1222. For a recent discussion of accretion, see Annotation, 54 ALR2d 643. … O’Brien et al v. Michels et ux, 222 Or 399 , 352 P2d 735 ; Zink et ux v. Davis et ux, 203 Or 49 , 277 P2d 1007 ; Ramsey v. Loomis, 6 Or 367 (1877).

Donovan v. Barnes

274 Or. 701 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1976

A written copy of the decision must be given to the student, and he must be advised in writing of his right to appeal to the University Appeals Board. … In Hill v.

State v. Jones

241 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 8, 1965

State v. *152 Brown, 41 Minn 319, 323, 43 NW 69 . (Emphasis supplied.) It is clear that these presumptions may not apply under the facts of this case. … Reed, 154 Mo 122, 55 SW 278 ; State v. Stockwell, 106 Mo 36, 16 SW 888 ; State v. Blunt, 91 Mo 503, 4 SW 394 ; State v. Edwards, 70 Mo 480; State v. Branstetter, 65 Mo 149; State v. Brown, 64 Mo 367; State v.

Rogers Construction Co. v. Hill, Public Utility Commissioner

235 Or. 352 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1963

Corp. v. United States, 307 US 125 , 59 S Ct 754 , 83 L ed 1147 (1939); Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 US 111 , 64 S Ct 851 , 88 L ed 1170 (1944). … Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 236 US 351 , 35 S Ct 370 , 59 L ed 616 (1915), *357 is an example of this.

Lethin v. Department of Revenue

278 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1977

Donald v. J. J. White Lbr. Co., 68 F2d 441 (5th Cir 1934); Portage Silica Co. v. Commissioner, 89 F2d 958 (6th Cir 1937). … Draft #1, 1973) 157-158, apparently following Hyman v. Regenstein, 258 F2d 502 (5th Cir 1958). See Casad, Res Judicata 148-149; Vestal, Res Judicata/Preclusion, V-251-256. 3 See cases collected in K.

State ex rel. Heath v. Kraft

20 Or. 28 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1890

Still another objection to the appellant’s contention: Sections 19 and 20 of the charter provide a canvassing board for the city, whose duty it was to certify the result of the election; and by that certificate it appeared … If it did, the case would be governed by Simon v. Common Council of Portland, 9 Or. 437 .

Admire v. Gladden

227 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1961

In Re Application of Hodge, 262 F2d 778; Hoover v. U.S., 268 F2d 787; Williams v. New York, 337 US 241 , 69 S Ct 1079 , 93 L Ed 1337 ; 16A CJS 683, Constitutional Law § 593. … It is little wonder the trial court was inclined to give the maximum permitted by law and leave the determination of when, if ever, a reformation might take place in the plaintiff to the judgment of the State Board of Probation

State v. Simonsen

310 Or. 412 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1990

Id.; State v. Moen, 309 Or 45 , 786 P2d 111 (1990); State v. Miranda, 309 Or 121 , 786 P2d 155 (1990); State v. Farrar, 309 Or 132 , 786 P2d 161 (1990). … That would be up to the Board of Probation and Parole * * Id. at 619 .