Case law

Portland v. White

106 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1922

Board of Missions v. Ah Wan, 18 Or. 339, 345 ( 22 Pac. 1105 ). There is no common-law right of appeal. The right is purely statutory: La Fayette v. Clark, 9 Or. 225 ; Barton v. … See also Doane v. Stein, 87 Or. 97 ( 169 Pac. 781 ); and State ex ret. v. Yates, 104 Or. 667 ( 209 Pac. 231 ). In Portland v. Nottingham, 58 Or. 1 ( 112 Pac. 28 ), and also in the case of Portland v.

Carstens Packing Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.

134 Or. 53 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1930

Co. v. Schaefer, 47 Ind.App. 371 ( 90 N.E. 502 ); San Antonio U. & G. Ry. Co. v. Storey et al., (Tex.) 172 S. W. 188 . … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ. concur.

E. Henry Wemme Co. v. Selling

123 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1927

Justice Brown in Boots et al. v. … Div. 499; Randall v. Dixon, 38 Ch. Div. (Eng.) 213; Bowden v. Brown, 200 Mass. 269 ( 86 N. E. 351 , 128 Am. St. Rep. 419 ).

Oakmont, LLC v. Dept. of Rev.

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 2016

The taxpayer may then appeal “an order of the board [to the magistrate division of the Tax Court] as a result of the appeal filed under ORS 309.100[.]” ORS 305.275(3); see also ESCO Corp. v. … See Bay v.

Landers v. Landers

226 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1961

Fritz v. Fritz (1946), 179 Or 612, 616 , 174 P2d 169 ; Cole v. Cole (1937), 157 Or 566 , 73 P2d 383 ; Larsen v. Duke (1925), 116 Or 25, 28 , 240 P 227 ; Howell v. Howell (1915), 77 Or 539, 547 , 152 P 217 ; Minard v. … that defendant failed to produce the clear and convincing evidence so. essential to rebut the presumption raised by OE.S 41.360(31) that a “child born in lawful wedlock, there being no decree of separation from bed and board

McElwain v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

245 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1966

Syfert v. Solomon, 95 Cal App 228, 272 P 810 (1928); Wendelken v. Stone, 88 NJL 267, 86 A 376 (1913); Beetschen v. Shell Pipe Line Corp. (Mo App) 248 SW2d 66 (1952). … Vaughn v. Missouri Power & Light Co., (Mo App) 89 SW2d 699 (1935); Funk v. H. S. Kerbaugh, 222 Pa 18, 70 A 953, 22 LRA, NS, 296 (1908); Yazoo & M. V. R. Co. v.

State v. Hyde

88 Or. 66 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1918

Ford, but the irregularity evidently passed the clerk of the State Land Board unnoticed. The affidavit accompanying the application is sworn .to before Clarence H. Jones. … The statement is for this reason inadmissible: Osmun v. Winters, 30 Or. 177, 186 . *70 187 ( 46 Pac. 780 ); State v. Tice, 30 Or. 457, 462, 463 ( 48 Pac. 367 ); State v. Magone, 32 Or. 206, 209 ( 51 Pac. 452 ); State v.

Carroll v. Bowne

55 Or. 316 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1910

Hatcher v. Briggs, 6 Or. 31, 40 . No facts are stated in the complaint, which tend in any degree to defeat Bowne’s right to recover upon the note. … The case of Manning v. Gasharie, 27 Ind. 399 , is somewhat in point.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Claussen

331 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 2000

*254 PER CURIAM In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that the accused lawyer, William J. … For example, in In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 595 , 956 P2d 188 (1998), the suggestion that all the elements of common-law fraud had to be shown to establish “fraud” under DR 1-102(A)(3) was made in the context of a case in which

Stop the Dump Coal. v. Yamhill Cnty.

364 Or. 432 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 2019

On review, petitioners take issue with both the latest order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in Stop the Dump Coalition v. Yamhill County , 74 Or. … Wetherell v.

Belt Et Ux. v. Matson

120 Or. 313 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1926

Carter v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dixson

305 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1988

client’s trust account at Beaver State Bank of Beaverton, Oregon, payable to the Oregon State Court Administrator’s office in the amount of $100, representing filing fees in the case of State ex rel Adult and Family Services v. … , and the board of governors as requested, subject only to the exercise of any applicable right or privilege.”

Peluck v. Pacific MacHine & Blacksmith Co.

134 Or. 171 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1930

As stated in Yovovich v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Besser v. Joyce

9 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1881

(Barnes v. Moore, 2 N. B. R. Reps., 573; Hallinshead v. Allen, 17 Pa. St., 275.) … (Rugh v. Ottenheimer, 6 Or., 231 ; 2 Bishop’s Law of Married Women,, secs. 147, 150, and cases cited; Staples v. Brown, 13 Allen, 64 .)

Stein v. Handy

212 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1957

In Snyder v. … In Lyons v.

State ex rel. Heath v. Kraft

18 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1890

If it did, the case would be governed by Simon v. Common Council of Portland, 9 Or. 437 . … Fenton v. Scott, 17 Or. 189 .

ROHNER ET UX v. Neville

230 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1961

Hirt v. Entus, 37 Wash2d 418, 224 P2d 620 ; Brown v. Wilson, 348 Mo 658, 155 SW2d 176 ; 4 Tiffany, The Law of Real Property (3d ed, 1939) § 1222. For a recent discussion of accretion, see Annotation, 54 ALR2d 643. … O’Brien et al v. Michels et ux, 222 Or 399 , 352 P2d 735 ; Zink et ux v. Davis et ux, 203 Or 49 , 277 P2d 1007 ; Ramsey v. Loomis, 6 Or 367 (1877).

Lethin v. Department of Revenue

278 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1977

Donald v. J. J. White Lbr. Co., 68 F2d 441 (5th Cir 1934); Portage Silica Co. v. Commissioner, 89 F2d 958 (6th Cir 1937). … Draft #1, 1973) 157-158, apparently following Hyman v. Regenstein, 258 F2d 502 (5th Cir 1958). See Casad, Res Judicata 148-149; Vestal, Res Judicata/Preclusion, V-251-256. 3 See cases collected in K.

Feldschau v. Clatsop County

117 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1926

In Hayden v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Rogers Construction Co. v. Hill, Public Utility Commissioner

235 Or. 352 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1963

Corp. v. United States, 307 US 125 , 59 S Ct 754 , 83 L ed 1147 (1939); Board v. Hearst Publications, 322 US 111 , 64 S Ct 851 , 88 L ed 1170 (1944). … Pennsylvania Co. v. United States, 236 US 351 , 35 S Ct 370 , 59 L ed 616 (1915), *357 is an example of this.