Case law

State v. Quebrado

372 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 2024

See State v. … State v.

Buck v. Mueller

207 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1956

The plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it is pertinent to this opinion, alleges the following: “V. … In Dellwo v.

McHorse v. Portland General Electric Company

268 Or. 323 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1974

Brown and D. Keith Swanson, Salem, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With them on the brief were Brown, Burt & Swanson, Salem. HOWELL, Justice. … In Fagerlie v. New York Life Ins.

Gile & Co. v. Lasselle

89 Or. 107 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 14, 1918

This is taught in Hubler v. Gaston, 9 Or. 66 ( 42 Am. Rep. 794 ) ; Rosenthal Bros. v. Kahn Bros., 19 Or. 571, 573 ( 24 Pac. 989 ); Hamilton v. Gordon, 22 Or. 557, 558 (30 Pac. 495); Backhaus v. … A. 526); Casto v. Murray, 47 Or. 57 ( 81 Pac. 388, 883 ); Taylor v. Brown, 49 Or. 423 ( 90 Pac. 673 ). This is not in derogation of the doctrine of McNeff v. Southern Pac.

State v. Kline

50 Or. 426 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1907

Clements, 15 Or. 237 ( 14 Pac. 410 ); Roberts v. Parrish, 17 Or. 583 ( 22 Pac. 136 ); Craft v. Dalles City, 21 Or. 53 ( 27 Pac. 163); Fisher v. Kelly, 26 Or. 249 ( 38 Pac. 67 ); Farrell v. … Washer, 17 Or. 50 ( 16 Pac. 926 ); Harris v. Harsch, 29 Or. 562 ( 46 Pac. 141 ); Brentano v. Brentano, 41 Or. 15 ( 67 Pac. 922 ). 8.

Dahlhammer & Roelfs v. Schneider

197 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1953

However, in Egr v. … As was said in Bliss v.

Mathews v. Chambers Power Co.

81 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1916

Rep. 342 ); Allen v. Dunlap, 24 Or. 229 ( 33 Pac. 675 ); Mendenhall v. Harrisburg Water Co., 27 Or. 38 ( 39 Pac. 399 ); Union Power Co. v. Lichty, 42 Or. 563 ( 71 Pac. 1044 ); Moore v. … Krimbel, 28 Or. 271 ( 42 Pac. 995 ); Goldsmith v. Elwert, 31 Or. 539 ( 50 Pac. 867 ); Board of Regents v. Hutchinson, 46 Or. 57 ( 78 Pac. 1028 ); McCoy v. Crossfield, 54 Or. 591 ( 104 Pac. 423 ); Bank of Commerce v.

Nirschl v. Nirschl

119 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1926

BROWN, J. The defendant presents a persuasive, if not a convincing, argument in contrariety of the findings made by the trial court. … He grounds his contention upon the proviso contained in Section 3 of Chapter 163, Laws of Oregon,’1907, as construed by this court in Olson v.

Elliott v. City of Portland

87 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1917

In the case of City of Portland v. … Brown, Grace Finley, TJ. G. Love, T. Y. Ogle and Anna Svoboda, can be affected only as to interest which should be computed from ten days after the reassessment was docketed.

State of Oregon v. Risen

192 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1951

Jur., Rape, § 7; People v. Dohring, 59 N.Y. 374 , 17 Am. Rep. 349 , 355; Mills v. United States, 164 U.S. 644, 648 , 41 L. ed. 584, 17 S. Ct. 210 ; Brown v. State, 127 Wis. 193, 199 , 106 N.W. 536 ; Bailey v. … Hammond v. State, 39 Neb. 252 , 58 N.W. 92, 94 ; State v. Mertz, 129 Wash. 420 , 225 P. 62 ; Hill v.

School Dist. No. 24 v. Smith

97 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1920

.” *9 This section was construed by this court in Grant County v. Lake County, 17 Or. 453 ( 21 Pac. 447 ), and Municipal Security Co. v. … Booth v. Bryan, 26 Or. 502 ( 38 Pac. 618 ). There is no available school fund to meet the plaintiff’s demand in this action. Both parties cite and rely upon State ex rel. v. Stannard, 84 Or. 450 ( 165 Pac. 566, 571 , L.

Dennis v. Employment Division

302 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1986

Following a hearing, the denial was affirmed by a referee and by the Employment Appeals Board (EAB). The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for reconsideration. Dennis v. … Dennis v. Employment Div., 77 Or App 633 , 638 n 4, 713 P2d 1079 (1986) (citing Frank v.

Bell v. Hanover Fire Insurance

107 Or. 513 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1923

BROWN, J. Manifestly, it was error for the court to award judgment bearing interest from the *518 date of the issuance of the policies. From the plaintiff’s case, the loss did not occur until March 27,1920. … R. 218); Couch v. Scandinavian-American Bank et al., 103 Or. 66 ( 197 Pac. 284 , 202 Pac. 558 , 203 Pac. 891 ); Livesley et al. v. Strauss, 104 Or. 356 ( 207 Pac. 1095 ); Fischer v. Bayer, 108 Or. 311 ( 211 Pac. 162 ).

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Reynolds

317 Or. 560 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1993

Because that argument was not made to the trial court or in the child’s petition for review to this court, we do not address it. 3 In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Co. v.

Whetstone v. Rogue River Valley Canal Co.

133 Or. 121 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1929

There was no showing as to cost of cultivation, harvesting, or marketing of the crop: Laur et al. v. Walla Walla Irr. Co., 118 Or. 520 ( 247 P. 753 ). … Brown, J. not sitting.

State v. Kellaher

90 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1919

“While, for certain purposes and under certain conditions, the power to fill a vacancy in office is conferred by the people upon a designated officer or board, yet I do not believe that in the present instance the people … Whitney v.

McNeff v. Heider

216 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1959

Brown v. Meier & Frank Co., 160 Or 608 , 86 P2d 79 ; Paget v. Cordes, 129 Or 224 , 227 P 101 ; Joseph v. Meier & Frank Co., 120 Or 117 , 250 P 739 . … State of Oregon v. Cahill, supra.

Marshall v. Olson

102 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 3, 1922

In the early case of Tenny v. … Bean, Brown and Me Court, JJ., concur.

Kosmecki v. Portland Stevedoring Co.

190 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1950

. *94 The burden of proof rested upon thé defendant to establish the facts upon which its claim to immunity is predicated: Inwall v. Transpacific Limber Co., 165 Or. 560 , 108 P. 2d 522 , and Brown v.

State v. Nettles

287 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1979

In United States v. … Brown v. United States, 411 US 223 , 36 L Ed 2d 208 , 93 S Ct 1565 (1973); Alderman v. United States, 394 US 165 , 22 L Ed 2d 176 , 89 S Ct 961 (1969); Wong Sun v.