Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.68s

  • Lewis & Dalin, Inc. v. E. H. Clarke Lumber Co.

    185 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1948

    The case of Bailey v. Bailey, 262 Mich. 215 , 247 N. … See Koch v. The St. Charles Hotel Co., 13 Oh. Cir. Ct. (N. S.) 163. Smyth v. Brown, 26 F. (2d) 462 (C. C.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mayer v. East Side Logging Co.

    130 Or. 341 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1929

    Wood v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 39 Fed. 52 , citing Ranger v. Great Western R. Co., 13 Sim. 368 (1 R. & Can. Cas. 1); Snell v. Brown, 71 Ill. 133 ; Palmer v. Clark, 106 Mass. 373 ; Ortman v. Green, 26 Mich. 209 . … Brown, J., did not participate in this opinion. Rehearing denied September 17, 1929.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Cutler Bindery Co.

    145 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1933

    Hall Company, a corporation, v. … R., Reed v. Brown, 58 L. J. Q. B. 120; 22 Q. B. D. 128).” Strouds Judicial Dictionary, 2nd. Ed. Vol. 1, 275.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jaquith v. Hartley

    243 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1966

    See Hale v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 209 Or 99 , 302 P2d 1010 (1956); Drake v. City of Portland, 172 Or 558 , 143 P2d 213 (1943). … Reversed with directions to enter a declaratory judgment consistent with this opinion. ① The trial court in Balacek v. Board of Trustees, Etc., 26 NYS2d 419 , 425 (1941), reached the same conclusion.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Dixson

    305 Or. 83 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1988

    client’s trust account at Beaver State Bank of Beaverton, Oregon, payable to the Oregon State Court Administrator’s office in the amount of $100, representing filing fees in the case of State ex rel Adult and Family Services v. … , and the board of governors as requested, subject only to the exercise of any applicable right or privilege.”

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Phegley & Cavender v. Swender Blue Print Co.

    133 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1930

    See: Metzger v. Guynup, 125 Or. 507 ( 265 P. 420 , 267 P. 812 ); Smith v. Cram, 113 Or. 313 ( 230 P. 812 ); Meyers v. Hot Lake Sanitorium Co., 82 Or. 587 ( 161 P. 697 ); Oregon Auto-Dispatch v. … Rand, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mills v. Williams

    113 Or. 528 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1924

    Justice Bean, in Laam v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McHorse v. Portland General Electric Company

    268 Or. 323 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1974

    Brown and D. Keith Swanson, Salem, argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant. With them on the brief were Brown, Burt & Swanson, Salem. HOWELL, Justice. … In Fagerlie v. New York Life Ins.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • State of Oregon v. Risen

    192 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1951

    Jur., Rape, § 7; People v. Dohring, 59 N.Y. 374 , 17 Am. Rep. 349 , 355; Mills v. United States, 164 U.S. 644, 648 , 41 L. ed. 584, 17 S. Ct. 210 ; Brown v. State, 127 Wis. 193, 199 , 106 N.W. 536 ; Bailey v. … Hammond v. State, 39 Neb. 252 , 58 N.W. 92, 94 ; State v. Mertz, 129 Wash. 420 , 225 P. 62 ; Hill v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Duester v. Alvin

    74 Or. 544 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 19, 1915

    not in esse, as for the building of a fence or the erection of a structure upon designated real property, are personal, and do not run with the land so as to bind assignees, unless they are expressly named in the deed: Brown … v.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Jeffries v. Pankow

    112 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1924

    The law does not require a futile or vain thing to be done: Turner v. Corbett, 9 Or. 79 ; Perrera v. Parke, 19 Or. 141 ( 23 Pac. 883 ); Catlin v. Jones, 48 Or. 158 ( 85 Pac. 515 ); Brown v. … Lewis, 50 Or. 358 ( 92 Pac. 1058 ); Brown v. Truax, 58 Or. 572 ( 115 Pac. 597 ); Treadgold v. Willard, 81 Or. 658 ( 160 Pac. 803 ); Siverson v. Clanton, 88 Or. 261 ( 170 Pac. 933 , 171 Pac. 1051 ); McLemore v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Woolley v. Plaindealer Publishing Co.

    47 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1906

    Butler, 7 Blackf. 251 ; Filber v. Dautermann, 26 Wis. 518 ; Langton v. Hagerty, 35 Wis. 150 . … McCarty, 44 Ga. 383 ; Gabe v. McGinnis, 68 Ind. 538 ; Gregory v. Atkins, 42 Vt. 237 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • City of East Portland v. County of Multnomah

    6 Or. 62 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

    The amendment also exempts the inhabitants of said city from road taxes, and from assessment for road work, providing that the board of trustees shall ’ assess and *63 collect annually from each male inhabitant, over twenty-one … (State v. Burchard, 2 Or. 78 ; State v. Bird, S. C. 1872.)

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Department of Revenue

    268 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1974

    School of the Bible v. Mult. … See also Christian Business Men’s Committee, Inc. v. State, 228 Minn 549, 38 NW2d 803 (1949).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State v. Skinner

    29 Or. 599 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1896

    In Welsh v. … It is true, the board of directors *604 of the association never rejected the application for a loan, but the testimony of Hawley, its general manager, tends to show that under its bylaws no loans could be made on farm property

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rieger v. Harrington

    102 Or. 603 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1922

    BROWN, J. … The proper construction of the section was before the Supreme Court of that state in Ligare v. Semple, 32 Mich. 438 .” The cases of Pratt v. Tefft, Ligare v. Semple, Atkins v. Atkins, and Bervnett v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Uris v. State Compensation Department

    247 Or. 420 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1967

    In the recent case of Howerton v. … See, also, Nash-Kelvinator Corp. v. Industrial Comm., 253 Wis 618, 34 NW2d 821 ; DiFiori v. U.S. Rubber Co., 78 RI 124, 79 A2d 925 ; Jarka Corporation of Philadelphia v.

    Cited 85 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. City of Portland

    87 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1917

    In the case of City of Portland v. … Brown, Grace Finley, TJ. G. Love, T. Y. Ogle and Anna Svoboda, can be affected only as to interest which should be computed from ten days after the reassessment was docketed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Scott v. MERCER STEEL CO., INC.

    263 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972

    Edgen v. … McHugh, 416 P2d 239 (Alas 1966); Jaillet v. Godfried Home Bakeries, Inc., 354 Mass 267, 236 NE2d 924 (1968); Scott v. Liebman, 404 SW2d 288 (Tex Sup Ct 1966); Kanner v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • McNeff v. Heider

    216 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1959

    Brown v. Meier & Frank Co., 160 Or 608 , 86 P2d 79 ; Paget v. Cordes, 129 Or 224 , 227 P 101 ; Joseph v. Meier & Frank Co., 120 Or 117 , 250 P 739 . … State of Oregon v. Cahill, supra.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.