Case law

Oregon City v. Moore

30 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1896

But it seems to us that upon this question the case is ruled by City of East Portland v. … This case was re-affirmed in Multnomah County v. Sliker, 10 Or. 65 ; and City of Astoria v. Clatsop County, not reported.

Beaver Lumber Co. v. Eccles

43 Or. 400 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1903

.) § 693; Vanderslice v. Knapp, 20 Kan. 647 . … Smith, 2 Hare, 239, 244; Coker v. Whitlock, 54 Ala. 180 ; Buckout v. Swift, 27 Cal. 433 ( 87 Am. Dec. 90 ); Harris v. Bannon, 78 Ky. 568 . See, also, State v. Northern Cent. Ry. Co. 18 Md. 193 .

Cramer v. Mengerhausen

275 Or. 223 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1976

Thus in Powell v. … As explained in a case comment on Turk v. H. C.

HANN v. Nored

233 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1963

The court distinguished Everart v. … Stare decisis prevented an overruling of Goodale Lumber Co. v. Shaw, supra. The import of The Multorpor Co. v.

Morata v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.

87 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1918

Justice Wolverton says, in Stager v. … This court has several times held that the servant does not assume lisks of which he has neither knowledge nor notice: Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 611 (101 Pac. 671); Richardson v. Klamath S. S.

West Side Sanitary District v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

289 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1980

In the second case, State ex rel Rodriguez v. … In the third case, West Side Sanitary Dist. v.

PARK CITY CORPORATION v. Watchie

249 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1968

Oregon has adopted this theory in Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co., 1908, 52 Or 70 , 96 P 528 . The doctrine is generally recognized. See 1 Fletcher, Corporations (rev ed 1963) ch 9, § 194 et seq. … Skyline property, that he formed plaintiff corporation and while he was in the complete control of it, sold the property to the corporation for double his own purchase price and that Watchie “did not disclose to either the Board

Huntley v. Ore. St. Ind. Acc. Com.

138 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1931

In the case of Blair v. State Industrial Accident Commission , 133, Or. 450 ( 288 P. 204 ), Mr. … BEAN, C.J., BROWN and BELT, JJ., concur. RAND, J., dissents. ROSSMAN and CAMPBELL, JJ., did not participate in this opinion. *Page 193

Cline v. Larson

234 Or. 384 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

Clauder v. Morser, supra, at 392, quoting from United States v. Oregon Med. Soc., 343 US 326, 339 , 96 L ed 978, 72 S Ct 690 , which in turn quoted from Boyd v. Boyd, 252 NY 422, 429 , 169 NE 632, 634 . … In re Brown’s Estate, 165 Or 575 , 108 P2d 775 , concerned a will in which the beneficiaries were the lawyer who drafted the will and another who occupied *425 a fiduciary relationship to the decedent.

Flavorland Foods v. Washington County Assessor

334 Or. 562 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2002

See Shields v. … Taxpayer challenged the assessor’s calculation of the maximum assessed value for its property before the Washington County Board of Property Tax Appeals (board). The board rejected taxpayer’s challenge.

Baker County v. Benson

40 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901

Dec. 189 ); Turpen v. Commissioners, 7 Ind. 172 ; Board v. Blake, 21 Ind. 32 ; People v. Devlin, 33 N. Y. 269 ( 88 Am. Dec. 377 ); Palmer v. City of New York, 2 Sandf. 318. … In People ex rel. v. Board of Sup’rs, 147 N. Y. 1 ( 41 N. E. 563 , 30 L. R.

General Electric Co. v. Wattle

207 Or. 302 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1956

Since the case of Nebbia v. … It is none the less price fixing, determined not by the legislature itself, nor by a board or commission acting under legislative authority, but by private individuals.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chase

339 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 2005

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated DR 7-106(A) and imposed a public reprimand as a sanction. … State ex rel Mikkelsen v. Hill, 315 Or 452, 458 , 847 P2d 402 (1993). The ABA Standards define “intent” as “the conscious objective or purpose to accomplish a particular result.” ABA Standards at 7.

State v. Harvey

117 Or. 466 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1926

BROWN, J. “The judicial power of the state shall be vested in one supreme court and in such other courts as may from time to time be created by law.” Or. Const., Art. VII, § la. … Bateham, 94 Or. 524 ( 186 Pac. 5 ); Ingram v. State, 67 Ala. 67 ; White v. State, 111 Ala. 92 ( 21 South. 330 ); People v. Moran, 144 Cal. 48 ( 77 Pac. 777 ); Cook v. State, 46 Fla. 20 ( 33 South. 665 ); State v.

Banick v. Banick

235 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

This is an appeal from a decree of separation from bed and board for three years entered under the provisions of OES 107.320. ① The defendant-husband in the divorce case challenges the right of the trial court to grant a … See Godfrey v. Godfrey, 228 Or 228 , 364 P2d 620 (1961); LaFollett v. LaFollett, 138 Or 411 , 2 P2d 1109 , 6 P2d 1085 (1932).

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation Commission

217 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1959

Social Security Board v. Nierotko, 327 US 358 , 66 S Ct 637 , 90 L ed 718. In Journal Pub. Co. v. State U.C. … Board of Review, 13 NJ Super 231, 80 A2d 316 ; In the Matter of the Employees of Weyerhaeuser Timber Co., -Wash -, 332 P2d 947 ; Erickson v. General Motors Corporation, 177 Kan 90, 276 P2d 376 .

United States Nat. Bank v. Shefler

77 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1915

Carson & Brown. Mr. Justice Harris delivered the opinion of the court. 3,4. … Patterson, 5 Or. 353 ; Wyatt v. Wyatt, 31 Or. 531 ( 49 Pac. 855 ); Morrison’s Estate, 48 Or. 612 ( 87 Pac. 1043 ); Scott v. Smith, 58 Or. 591 ( 115 Pac. 969 ); Matthews v. Matthews, 60 Or. 451 ( 19 Pac. 766 ); Neal v.

Valley & Siletz Railroad v. Thomas

151 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1935

We do not sit as a board of revision, but to enforce constitutional rights. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. Jasper, 189 U. S. 439, 446 . … Co. v. Virginia, 290 U.

Stewart v. Stewart

117 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1926

BROWN, J. This is a suit for divorce, grounded upon subdivision 5, Section 507, Or. … In Thorndike v. Boston, 1 Met. (Mass.) 242, 245, Mr.

Nichols v. Ingram

75 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1915

Young, 21 Nev. 401 ( 32 Pac. 490 ); O’Connor v. Blake, 29 Cal. 312 ; Loveland v. Mining Co., 76 Cal. 562 ( 18 Pac. 682 ); Brown v. Harris, 2 G. Greene (Iowa), 505 ( 52 Am. Dec. 535 ); Harrow v. Lyon, 3 G. … Greene (Iowa), 157; Clap v. Bell, 4 Mass. *445 99 ; Johnson v. Edson, 2 Aikens (Vt.), 299; Littlefield v. Davis, 62 N. H. 492; Blynn v. Smith, 4 N. Y. Supp. 306 ; Higgins v. Grace, 59 Md. 365 ; Sherrod v.