Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
0.85s
Oregon Business Planning Council v. Department of Land Conservation & Development
290 Or. 741 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1981
ORS 197.320(3) expressly provided that "enforcement” orders shall be reviewed as contested cases and also expressly provided by Oregon Laws 1979, Ch. 772, that the Court of Appeals shall review decisions of the Land Use Board … Barnes v.
Cited 32 timesPublished145 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1933
The absence of any one of them is fatal to recovery;” Wheelwright v. Vanderbilt, 69 Or. 326 ( 138 P. 857 ); Brown v. Siemens, 117 Or. 583 ( 245 P. 510 ); Blair v. … Millar v. Semler, 137 Or. 610 ( 2 P. (2d) 233 , 3 P. (2d) 987 ); Hogan v. Mason Motor Company, 133 Or. 14 ( 288 P. 200 ). The judgment is affirmed. Rand, C. J., Bean and Bailey, JJ., concur.
Cited 13 timesPublished162 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1939
the number upon the stub drawn is called from the stage of the theatre, and if the person holding the coupon with the corresponding number is present within the theatre such person is entitled to choose a number from a board … In City of Wink v.
Cited 9 timesPublished107 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1923
Co. v. … Another case cited by the plaintiff is Brown v. Cooper, 98 Iowa, 444 ( 67 N. W. 378 , 60 Am. St. Rep. 190 , 33 L. R. A. 61.
Cited 15 timesPublished205 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1955
Supporting the text, the following cases are cited in the notes: Kennison v. State, 83 Neb 391, 119 SW 768 ; Brown v. State, 219 Ind 251, 37 NE2d 73 , 137 ALR 679 ; Watts v. State, 229 Ind 80, 95 NE2d 570 ; Mahaffey v. … Lea v. Brown, 166 Tenn 669, 64 SW2d 841 . *391 In Atlantic Nat. Bank v.
Cited 9 timesPublished174 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1944
Since the appeal was perfected in this court, the Supreme Court of the United States, on January 31, 1944, in Sarah Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U. S. 158 , 88 L. Ed. 645 , 64 S. … State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 , 87 L. Ed. 1628 , 63 S. Ct. 1178 ; 147 A. L. R. 674.; Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U. S. 510 , 69 L. Ed. 1070 , 45 S. Ct. 571 , 39 A. L. R. 468.
Cited 15 timesPublishedState Ex Rel. Johnson v. Farrell
175 Or. 87 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1944
State ex rel. v. Snell, supra; State ex rel. v. Olcott, supra; State ex rel. v. … Justice Brown, who served for many years as prosecuting attorney and attorney general, as well as a member of this court, is entitled to the greatest weight. It was he who wrote the opinion in Watts v.
Cited 8 timesPublished17 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1888
Sparks, and Whitlock were recorded at the election among the names of voters, but their ballots were not put in the ballot-box and counted, but were returned to the board of couneilmen of said city in a separate envelope, … Mahoney v. McKinnon, 8 Or. 494 . In that case it appeared that one ballot written on colored paper was received and placed in the ballot-bos, and one of the questions involved was whether this ballot could be counted.
Cited 9 timesPublished129 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1929
BROWN, J. First addressing ourselves to a consideration of the complaint herein, we note that the sufficiency of that pleading is attacked in this court for the first time. … See Wilson v. Peterson, 68 Or. 525 ( 136 Pac. 1187 ); Watson v. Hurlburt, 87 Or. 297 ( 170 Pac. 541 ); De Haven & Son Hardware Co. v. Schultz, 122 Or. 493 ( 259 Pac. 778 ).
Cited 7 timesPublished207 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1956
The plaintiff’s complaint, insofar as it is pertinent to this opinion, alleges the following: “V. … In Dellwo v.
Cited 3 timesPublished227 Or. 408 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1961
In State ex rel Smith v. … Chairman of Board of Parole, 81 F Supp 592 (DC Pa 1948), affirmed 175 F2d 780 (3rd Cir,1949); United States v. Marrin, 227 F 314 (DC Pa 1915); Davis v. Rhyne, 181 Kan 443, 312 P2d 626 (1957); Rawls v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMcCracken v. Walnut Park Garage, Inc.
156 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1937
It was so held in the following cases: Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Mackenzie, 33 Or. 209 ( 52 P. 1046 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 P. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Wollenberg v. … R. 1315); Anderson v. Hurlburt, 109 Or. 284 ( 219 P. 1092 ); Anderson v. Morse, 110 Or. 39 ( 222 P. 1083 ); Turnbow v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedGrisel v. Oregon State Penitentiary
290 Or. 719 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1981
Brown, Atty. Gen., Salem, and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem. TANZER, Justice. This is a prison disciplinary proceeding. The Court of Appeals affirmed the disciplinary order and we allowed review. … Grisel v. OSP, 47 Or. App. 673 , 614 P.2d 1231 (1980).
Cited 2 timesPublished99 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1921
Hammond v. Chicago etc. Ry. … Johns, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 14 timesPublishedBennett Trust Co. v. Sengstacken
58 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 7, 1911
In Marsden v. … In Biggs v.
Cited 27 timesPublished21 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1891
(Jacquins v. Com. 9 Cush. 279 .) … So in Mayne v.
Cited 16 timesPublishedEnterprise Irrigation District v. Enterprise Land & Investment Co.
137 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1931
This is the doctrine announced in Welch v. Clatsop County, 24 Or. 452 ( 33 P. 934 ), and has become the settled law of this state. … Brew, 44 Vt. 175 ; White v. People, 94 Ill. 604; City of Bloomington v. Chicago, etc., Co., 134 Ill. 451 ( 26 N. E. 366 ); City of Allegheny v. Western Pennsylvania R. Co., 138 Pa. 375 ( 21 Atl. 763 ); Hanscom v.
Cited 7 timesPublished40 Or. 207 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901
Dec. 189 ); Turpen v. Commissioners, 7 Ind. 172 ; Board v. Blake, 21 Ind. 32 ; People v. Devlin, 33 N. Y. 269 ( 88 Am. Dec. 377 ); Palmer v. City of New York, 2 Sandf. 318. … In People ex rel. v. Board of Sup’rs, 147 N. Y. 1 ( 41 N. E. 563 , 30 L. R.
Cited 14 timesPublished235 Or. 70 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963
This is an appeal from a decree of separation from bed and board for three years entered under the provisions of OES 107.320. ① The defendant-husband in the divorce case challenges the right of the trial court to grant a … See Godfrey v. Godfrey, 228 Or 228 , 364 P2d 620 (1961); LaFollett v. LaFollett, 138 Or 411 , 2 P2d 1109 , 6 P2d 1085 (1932).
Cited 0 timesPublished52 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1908
Law (2 ed.), 199; 22 Cyc. 903; Delaware Surety Co. v. Layton (Del. Ch. 50 Atl. 378 , 380; Nelson v. State Board of Health, 108 Ky. 769, 782 ( 57 S. W. 501 : 50 L. R. A. 383) ; Gile v. Stegner, 92 Minn. 429, 431 ( 100 N. … Co. v. Boyle (Fed.) 82 Fed. 705, 710 ; Board of Liquidation v. McComb, 92 U. S. 531, 541 ( 23 L. Ed. 623 ) ; Noble v. Union River Log. Ry. Co. 147 U. S. 165, 172 (13 Sup. Ct. 271: 37 L. Ed. 123 ); Smyth v. Ames, 169 U.
Cited 42 timesPublished
Ask Donna