Case law

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Germundson

301 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1986

We summarize the course of events, which is largely undisputed, from the findings of the trial panel appointed by the Disciplinary Board. … Langan, 301 Or 1 , 3 n 1, 718 P2d 719 (1986); Davis v. Tyee Industries, Inc., 58 Or App 292, 300 , 648 P2d 388 (1982). Quotation of statutory words relevant to an issue is not only a convenience for the court.

Montgomery v. Page

29 Or. 320 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1896

In Wade v. … Rep. 416 ); Mansfield v. Edwards, 136 Mass. 15 ( 49 Am. Rep. 1 ); Water Power Company v. Brown, 23 Kan. 676 ; Barry v. Ransom, 12 N. Y. 462 .

Gentry v. Pacific Livestock Co.

45 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1904

In the suit of Pacific Livestock Co. v. … Rep. 780 ); Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 .

Bennett v. State Industrial Accident Commission

203 Or. 275 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1955

Comm., 148 Or 661 , 38 P2d 696 ; Brown v. Underwood Lumber Co., 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 ; McLean v. State Ind. Acc. Comm., 189 Or 405 , 221 P2d 566 . … See Eichholz v. Shaft, 166 Minn 339, 208 NW 18 ; Craine v. Department of Labor and Industries, 19 Wash2d 75, 141 P2d 129 . 3.

Doolittle v. Pacific Coast Safe & Vault Works

79 Or. 498 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1916

Harris, 24 Mich. 115 ; Fisk v. Henarie, 13 Or. 156 ( 9 Pac. 322 ); Flegel v. Dowling, 54 Or. 40 ( 102 Pac. 178 , 135 Am. St. Rep. 812 , 19 Ann. Cas. 1159); 26 Cyc. 969; Nash v. Kreling, 6 Cal. … As to duration, we think it was competent for the jury to determine from the evidence that the hiring was annual, and not subject to revocation or change by the board of directors or the president.” 8.

Seton v. Hoyt

43 L.R.A. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1899

Board of Public Works, 36 Ohio St. 409 ; Carr v. State, 127 Ind. 204 (11 L. R. A. 370, 26 N. E. 778 ); Attorney-General v. Cape Fear Nav. Co., 37 N. C. (2 Ired. Eq.) 444 ; Bledsoe v. State, 64 N. C. 392 ; Town of Mt. … Stat. *280 § 271; Lesseps v. Wicks, 12 La. Ann. 739 ; People ex rel. v. Board of Supervisors, 70 N. Y. 228 ; Chew Heong v. United States, 112 U. S. 536 (5 Sup. Ct. 255); Bay v. Gage, 36 Barb. 447 ; Bauer Grocer Co. v.

Howard v. Merrick

145 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1933

The absence of any one of them is fatal to recovery;” Wheelwright v. Vanderbilt, 69 Or. 326 ( 138 P. 857 ); Brown v. Siemens, 117 Or. 583 ( 245 P. 510 ); Blair v. … Millar v. Semler, 137 Or. 610 ( 2 P. (2d) 233 , 3 P. (2d) 987 ); Hogan v. Mason Motor Company, 133 Or. 14 ( 288 P. 200 ). The judgment is affirmed. Rand, C. J., Bean and Bailey, JJ., concur.

McFadden v. Bain

162 Or. 250 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1939

the number upon the stub drawn is called from the stage of the theatre, and if the person holding the coupon with the corresponding number is present within the theatre such person is entitled to choose a number from a board … In City of Wink v.

City of Portland v. Thornton

174 Or. 508 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1944

Since the appeal was perfected in this court, the Supreme Court of the United States, on January 31, 1944, in Sarah Prince v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 321 U. S. 158 , 88 L. Ed. 645 , 64 S. … State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624 , 87 L. Ed. 1628 , 63 S. Ct. 1178 ; 147 A. L. R. 674.; Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U. S. 510 , 69 L. Ed. 1070 , 45 S. Ct. 571 , 39 A. L. R. 468.

McCracken v. Walnut Park Garage, Inc.

156 Or. 697 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1937

It was so held in the following cases: Security Savings & Trust Co. v. Mackenzie, 33 Or. 209 ( 52 P. 1046 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 P. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Wollenberg v. … R. 1315); Anderson v. Hurlburt, 109 Or. 284 ( 219 P. 1092 ); Anderson v. Morse, 110 Or. 39 ( 222 P. 1083 ); Turnbow v.

Thompson Estate Co. v. Kamm

107 Or. 61 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1923

Co. v. … Another case cited by the plaintiff is Brown v. Cooper, 98 Iowa, 444 ( 67 N. W. 378 , 60 Am. St. Rep. 190 , 33 L. R. A. 61.

Westervelt v. Risley

108 Or. 652 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1923

The description set forth in the complaint complies with the certainty of description required in a deed: Bogard v. Barham, 52 Or. 121, 124 ( 96 Pac. 673 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 676 , 678). … Bean, Brown and Rand, JJ., concur.

Keller v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.

214 Or. 654 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1958

A particularly careful analysis of the entire question is presented in Products Liability and the Food Consumer by Beed Dickerson, Little, Brown and Company, 1951. … Pepper Co. v. Brittain, 234 Ala 548, 176 So 286; Le Blanc v. Louisiana Coca Cola Bottling Co., 60 So2d 873, 221 La 919; Tafoya v. Las Cruces Coca Cola Bottling Co., 59 N Mex 43, 278 P2d 575 , and Rutherford v.

Richardson Et Ux. v. Murphy

198 Or. 640 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1953

An official of the State Board of Forestry saw in the pit material which he described as “a bunch of excelsior, hair matting, probably padding”. The quantity was large. … Wattier, 25 Or 7, 34 P 756 , and Phipps v. Rogue River Valley Canal Co., 80 Or 175 , 156 P 794 .

Union Pacific Railroad v. Hill

220 Or. 591 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1960

Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, 254 U.S. 394 , 41 S.Ct. 169 , 65 L.Ed. 322 ; Missouri Pacific Ry. Co. v. City of Omaha, 235 U.S. 121 , 35 S.Ct. 82 , 59 L.Ed. 157 ; Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Public U. … Co. v. Board of Public Utility Com’rs, supra.” (Emphasis supplied) 321 P2d at 227 . A later case, with the same parties but involving other grade crossings, summarily followed the eases just cited.

Trowbridge v. States Steamship Co.

242 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1965

Plaintiff, a merchant seaman, was injured when he fell on a gangplank while he was attempting to board defendant’s vessel on which he was employed. … Even so, the Pimto opinion, in its analysis of Mitchell v. Trawler Racer, Inc., 1960, 362 US 539 , 80 S Ct 926 , 4 L Ed2d 941, *232 does not read Mitchell as we did in Gentry v.

Cockerham v. First Nat. Bank of Redmond

136 Or. 176 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1931

v. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Alexander v. Gladden

205 Or. 375 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1955

Supporting the text, the following cases are cited in the notes: Kennison v. State, 83 Neb 391, 119 SW 768 ; Brown v. State, 219 Ind 251, 37 NE2d 73 , 137 ALR 679 ; Watts v. State, 229 Ind 80, 95 NE2d 570 ; Mahaffey v. … Lea v. Brown, 166 Tenn 669, 64 SW2d 841 . *391 In Atlantic Nat. Bank v.

State v. Hall

339 Or. 7 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2005

Lower federal courts also have presumed that the analysis from Wong Sun and its progeny concerning the admissibility of confessions under the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule, see, e.g., Brown v. … In Brown v.

Grisel v. Oregon State Penitentiary

290 Or. 719 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1981

Brown, Atty. Gen., Salem, and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem. TANZER, Justice. This is a prison disciplinary proceeding. The Court of Appeals affirmed the disciplinary order and we allowed review. … Grisel v. OSP, 47 Or. App. 673 , 614 P.2d 1231 (1980).