Case law

McKinnon v. Union High School District No. 1

116 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1925

Section 5313, subdivision 3, prescribes: “When authorized by a majority vote of the legal voters present at any legally called meeting, in a union high school district, the board of such district may, in the name and behalf … This we cannot do: McLaughlin v. Hoover, 1 Or. 31 ; Stoppenbach v. Multnomah County, 71 Or. 493, 509 ( 142 Pac. 832 ); 25 R. C. L. 1062, 1063, §§ 286, 287.

State v. Logston

374 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2025

See State v. … Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536, 540, 175 P3d 408 (2007). Under the indeterminate sentencing system that existed when ORS 137.123 was enacted, there was no such thing as a “sentence” of probation.

In Re Estate of Purdin

128 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1929

In Emery v. Brown, 63 Or. 264 ( 127 Pac. 582 ), we held that notice of the motion to extend time to file the transcript was not necessary in the Circuit Court and this holding was repeated in Subbo v.

Mills v. Dunn Bros.

264 Or. 156 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 7, 1972

Brown v. Spokane, P. & S. Ry. Co., 248 Or 110, 117 , 431 P2d 817 (1967).

Douglas County Road Co. v. County of Douglas

6 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

The matter involved herein first came before this court in the suit of The Douglas County Road Co. v. Abraham et al., decided at the December term, 1874, and reported in 5 Or. 322 . … The recital of the contract is that it was made and concluded by the county court— composed of a county judge and two county commissioners, whose names are given, sitting as a board to do county business.

Smith v. HICKEY

188 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1950

Co. v. Robbins, 53 Neb. 44 ( 73 *545 N. … Co., 113 Or. 670 , 234 P. 296 , a proceeding to set aside a judgment, the court — Justice Brown speaking — said: “It is a well-established rule of law that relief from a judgment which is void for want of service of process

Davis v. Portland General Electric Co.

286 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1979

James v. Carnation Co., 278 Or 65, 69 , 562 P2d 1192 (1977). … Wald v.

Forrester v. Hauser Construction Co.

116 Or. 222 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1925

BROWN, J. … In Longfellow v.

Hoskins v. Scott

52 Or. 271 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 1908

Drake v. Sears, 8 Or. 209, 213 ; Blagen v. Thompson, 23 Or. 239, 248 ( 31 Pac. 647 : 18 L. R. A. 315), Hockersmith v. Hanley, 29 Or. 27, 36 ( 44 Pac. 497 ) ; Hunt v. Oregon Pac. Ry. Co. (C. … State v. Brown, 28 Or. 147, 167 ( 41 Pac. 1042 ), Davis v. Emmons, 32 Or. 389, 394 ( 51 Pac. 652 ). 9.

Goss v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

48 Or. 439 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1906

Co. v. Mallette, 92 Ala. 209 , 9 South. 363 ; Southern Kan. Ry. Co. v. Walsh, 45 Kan. 653 , 26 Pac. 45 ; Feital v. Middlesex Railroad Co. 109 Mass. 398 , 12 Am. Rep. 720 ; Spellman v. Lincoln Rapid Transit. … The car door which caused the injury to the plaintiff was not imdér the exclusive control of the defendant, but was being constantly used by passengers boarding and alight *443 ing from the train and in going from one car

Bernert v. Multnomah Lbr. & Box Co.

119 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1926

Thiele v. Cities Service Co., 31 Del. 514 ( 115 Atl. 773 , 22 A. L. R. 8); State ex rel. Costello v. Middlesex Banking Co., 87 Conn. 483 ( 88 Atl. 861 ); Wilson v. Mackinaw State Bank, 217 Ill. App. 494 ; Venner v. … J., and Bean-and Brown, JJ., concur.

Lindgren v. Berg

307 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1989

Lindgren v. Berg, 89 Or App 514 , 749 P2d 1212 (1988). We review the Court of Appeals decision for errors of law, Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984), and affirm. … Lindgren v.

Woodworth v. Vranizan

273 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1975

Based upon Killiam v. … Commonwealth, Inc., supra ( 256 Or 11 ), this issue was raised in Brown v. Grimm, 258 Or 55 , 481 P2d 63 (1971).

State v. Miller

119 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1926

S.) 403); State v. Campbell, 82 Conn. 671 ( 74 Atl. 927 , 135 Am. St. Rep. 293 , 18 Ann. Cas. 236); Madding v. State, 118 Ark. 506 ( 177 S. W. 410 ); State v. Welford, 29 R. I. 450 ( 72 Atl. 396 ); State v. … J., and Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Adams v. Albina Engine Works

97 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1920

The rule is stated in Geldard v. … See, also, Galvin v. Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598, 608 ( 101 Pac. 671 ); Rogers v. Portland Lumber Co., 54 Or. 387, 392 ( 102 Pac. 601 , 103 Pac. 514 ); Kopacin v.

Wadsworth v. Talmage

365 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 2019

Brown et al, 215 Or 714, 716, 335 P2d 847, decision clarified on denial of reh’g, 215 Or 723, 337 P2d 358 (1959) (same). … One possible objection, discussed 6 As part of its evidence of inconsistency, the Ninth Circuit highlighted two excerpts from the Court of Appeals decision in Brown v.

Oregon City v. Clackamas County

32 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1898

superintendent shall perform the duties of supervisor as re *493 quired by the general laws of this state relating to streets and highways; but he shall report to and be under the direction of the city council, and not to the board … The case of Oregon City v.

George v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Ry. Co.

124 Or. 598 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1928

Co. v. Esteve Brothers & Co., 256 U. S. 566 ( 65 L. Ed. 1094 , 41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 584). Judgment reversed. ’ ’ In the case of American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Pere Marquette R. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Fong

211 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1957

Commonwealth v. Webster, supra, 59 Mass at 316. See State v. Hansen, 195 Or 169, 201 , 244 P2d 990 ; State v. Clark, 99 Or 629, 645 , 196 P 360 ; State v. Zullig, 97 Or 427, 431 , 190 P 580 ; State v. … The case of State v.

Adamson v. Bonesteele

295 Or. 815 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1983

Clark v. McGee, supra, is a memorandum opinion, relying in part upon Sheridan v. … In Hauser v.