Case law

Sargent v. Pendleton Auto Co.

121 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 2, 1927

Justice Brown said in Bridewell v. Henderson, 99 Or. 506, 511 ( 195 Pac. 575 ): “ * * The vehicle was not cast out from the protection of the law by reason of the plaintiffs’ failure to observe the statute.

McKinnon v. Union High School District No. 1

116 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1925

Section 5313, subdivision 3, prescribes: “When authorized by a majority vote of the legal voters present at any legally called meeting, in a union high school district, the board of such district may, in the name and behalf … This we cannot do: McLaughlin v. Hoover, 1 Or. 31 ; Stoppenbach v. Multnomah County, 71 Or. 493, 509 ( 142 Pac. 832 ); 25 R. C. L. 1062, 1063, §§ 286, 287.

Davis v. Portland General Electric Co.

286 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1979

James v. Carnation Co., 278 Or 65, 69 , 562 P2d 1192 (1977). … Wald v.

State v. Maney

297 Or. 620 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1984

ORS 161.025(2) State v. … United States v. Jackson, 513 F2d 456, 459 (DC Cir 1975); Hunt v.

McVicker v. Cone

21 Or. 353 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1891

Co. v. Ruble, 8 Or. 284 .) In the case last cited, Kelly, C. … Nor does the case of Paxton Cattle Co. v. First National Bank, 21 Neb. 621 ; 59 Am. Rep. 852 ; relied upon, support the contention for the appellant.

Coates v. Slusher

109 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1924

Coates and the officer was competent (Pugsley v. … J. 1148, 1149; Nevins v. Nevins, 68 Kan. 410 ( 75 Pac. 492 ); Hart *631 pence v. Rogers, 143 Mo. 623 ( 45 S. W. 650 ). In 13 R. C.

Entler v. Hamilton

258 Or. 65 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1971

Shelton v. Paris, 199 Or 365, 372 , 261 P2d 856 (1953); Snyder v. Prairie Logging Co., Inc., 207 Or 572, 581-583 , 298 P2d 180 (1956). … The Code was promulgated by the Workmen’s Compensation Board and has the force of law. ORS 654.025.

Adamson v. Bonesteele

295 Or. 815 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1983

Clark v. McGee, supra, is a memorandum opinion, relying in part upon Sheridan v. … In Hauser v.

Mignot v. Mignot

187 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1949

In Day v. … Shirley v. Burch, 16 Or. 1, 5 , 18 P. 344, 346 . A similar rule is stated in Kelley v. Pike, 17 Or. 330 , 20 P. 685 , Brown v.

Arstill v. Hare

89 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1918

The record shows affirmatively the filing of field-notes, plats and profiles, and the question of their sufficiency cannot be investigated in a proceeding of this nature: Garnsey v. … The third point raised by appellants is that the County Court, having rejected the first report of the board of viewers, and without making an order discharging them, reappointed the same parties, making a new order for viewing

Heltzel v. Baird

90 Or. 156 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1918

It also appears from the record that the only lien upon the property was a mortgage in favor of the State Land Board and that a release from such mort *162 gage was executed and tendered as to the tract in question. … The legal questions here involved are very similar to those in the case of McCourt v.

Glickman v. Weston

140 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1932

Klopot v. Metropolitan Stock Exchange, 188 Mass. 335 ( 74 N. E. 596 ); Kirchner v. New Home Co., 135 N. Y. 182 ( 31 N. E. 1104 ); Taggart v. Merchants etc., 38 Fed. (2d) 205. In Wood v. … J., Brown and Kelly, JJ., concur. Petition for rehearing denied July 12,1932

Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River Railroad

146 Or. 461 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1934

Co., 14 Or. 22 ( 12 P. 83 ); William Hanley Co. v. *464 Combs, 60 Or. 609 ( 119 P. 333 ); Douglas v. Rumelin, 130 Or. 375 ( 280 P. 329 ). … Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River R. R., supra; McCulsky v. Klosterman, 20 Or. 108 ( 25 P. 366 , 10 L. R. A. 785); Coast Fir Lumber Co. v. Parker, 106 Or. 641 ( 213 P. 617 ).

STATE, BY & THROUGH HALEY v. City of Troutdale

281 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1978

Taylor v. … Heinig v.

Fehl v. Jackson County

177 Or. 200 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1945

September 15 the board of supervisors appointed the relator, T. J. Fleming, county treasurer. … Such being our view, it is unnecessary for us to review herein People v. Craig, (Cal.) 61 P. (2d) 934 ; State ex rel. Jones v. Tugwell, 199 La. 12 , 5 So. (2d) 368 ; State v. Dearth, 201, Ind. 1, 164 N.

State v. Blake

292 Or. 486 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1982

Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen. and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem. DENECKE, Chief Justice. … Tharalson v. State Dept. of Revenue, 281 Or. 9, 13 , 573 P.2d 298 (1978).

Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Assn.

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2025

See Lowe v. … But that case, Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No C 11-03082 LB, 2014 WL 6483216 (ND Cal Nov 18, 2014), again highlights the challenges I think plain- tiffs will face in the next stage of this litigation.

Steiwer v. Steiwer

112 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1924

BROWN, J. The plaintiff in this cause was divorced in a former suit. She now makes a collateral attack upon the court’s decree dissolving the marriage contract. In the case of Leland L. Steiwer v. … In De Vall v.

Powell v. Sheets

196 Or. 682 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1952

“V. … “V.

Myers v. Olds

121 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1927

BROWN, J. We will take up the questions in the order in which they are set out above. … Kelley v. Bourne, 15 Or. 476 ( 16 Pac. 40 ). See, also, Willis v. Crawford, 38 Or. 522 ( 63 Pac. 985 , 64 Pac. 866 , 53 L. R. A. 904); Hanthorn v. Quinn, 42 Or. 1 ( 69 Pac. 817 ).