Case law

Dryden v. Daly

89 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1918

S.) 639); Morton v. Wessinger, 58 Or. 80 ( 113 *224 Pac. 7 ); Long v. Dufur, 58 Or. 162 ( 113 Pac. 59 ); Moore v. Fowler, 58 Or. 292 ( 114 Pac. 472 ); Proebstel v. Trout, 60 Or. 145 ( 118 Pac. 551 ); McDaniel v. … tapper are positions within the definition of said Class K and that plaintiff and petitioner was duly examined, classified and appointed as required by the charter provisions and rules and regulations of the Civil Service Board

In Re Shepherd's Estate

183 Or. 629 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1948

Erickson v. … Justice Andrews in Brown v. Clark, 77 N.

Vokoun v. City of Lake Oswego

335 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 2002

See Brown v. J. C. Penney Co., 297 Or 695, 705 , 688 P2d 811 (1984) (describing standard of review in determining whether trial court erred in denying motion for directed verdict). … See Yates v.

Caffey v. Lane County

298 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1984

See Carriker v. Lake County, 89 Or 240 , 171 P 407 (1918). … Brown, Legal Counsel to the House Judiciary Committee, to Senate Judiciary Committee, May 5,1961.

Fuller v. Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co.

93 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1919

Do you know where the S. board is there at North Fork, or was at that time? “A. I know about where it was, yes. “Q. … Well, the caboose was outside the S. board at that particular place. *172 “Q. Do you mean to tell this jury when you stopped to head in, and your hind end is outside the S. board, you don’t have your flagman go out ?

In re Waters of Umatilla River

88 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 27, 1917

Rep. 727 ); Hindman v. Rizor, 21 Or. 112 ( 27 Pac. 13 ); Hough v. Porter, 51 Or. 318 ( 95 Pac. 732 , 98 Pac. 1083 , 102 Pac. 728 ); Mann v. Parker, 48 Or. 321 ( 86 Pac. 598 ); Caviness v. La Grande Irr. … Leyde, 77 Or. 569 ( 143 Pac. 621 , 151 Pac. 733 ); Coopey v.

State Ex Rel. Innes v. Haner

123 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1927

In principle, this cause is in many respects similar to the case of Gosso v. … day: Gosso v.

Wilkens v. Western States Grocery Co.

167 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1941

The remainder of the office space shall be one large room, and the walls of the office rooms shall be insulated with one-half (%) inch insulation board. … S., Contracts, 1284, § 617; Way v. Greer, 196 Mass. 237, 246 , 81 N. E. 1002 ; Cutter v. Spens, 191 Mich. 603, 615 , 158 N. W. 224 ; O’Connell v. Ward, 130 Minn. 443, 446 , 153 N. W. 865 ; Sabin v.

State v. Myers

20 Or. 442 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1891

In State v. … In Bewley v.

Lyons v. Lich

145 Or. 606 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1933

Hesse v. Mittelman, ante page 421 ( 27 P. (2d) 1022 ); Hovedsgaard v. Grand Rapids Store & Equip. Corp., 138 Or. 39 ( 5 P. (2d) 86 ); Brown v. Holzwasser, Inc., 108 Cal. App. 483 ( 291 P. 661 ); Williamson v. … Hesse v. Mittelman, supra; Hovedsgaard v. Grand Rapids Store, etc., supra; DeMars v. Heathman, supra.

Sun Dial Ranch v. May Land Co.

61 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1912

Carpenter v. Board of Com’rs, 56 Minn. 513, 522 ( 58 N. W. 295, 297 ). Mr. Justice CURTIS in the case of Howard v. Ingersoll, 13 How. 426, 427 ( 14 L. … See, also, Bowlby v. Shively, 22 Or. 410 ( 30 Pac. 154 ), and Taylor *217 Sands Fishing Co. v. State Land Board, 56 Or. 157, 161 ( 108 Pac. 126 ), wherein Mr.

Delta Farms v. Scappoose Drainage District

206 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1955

Acting under the above law, the board of supervisors of said district, determining that the above acreage was used for growing crops, proceeded to levy assessments against the same. … In Weddle et al. v. Parrish, 135 Or 345 , 295 P 454 , we said: “* * * the word ‘crop’ usually does not apply to grass growing on depastured lands: Moore v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 76 W. Va. 649, 656 ( 86 S.

In Re Estate of Brizzolari

129 Or. 307 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

Co. v. Virginia Gold Hill Water Co. , 6 Fed. Cas. 72 , No. 2990; Appleton v. Smith , 1 Fed. Cas. 1075 , No. 498; Plattner Implement Co. v. International Harvester Co. , 133 Fed. 376 ( 66 C.C.A. 438 ); Hardy v. … McBRIDE, ROSSMAN, BELT and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Multnomah County v. Portland Cracker Co.

49 Or. 345 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 21, 1907

The entry made by Stimson on the delinquent tax roll consisted of these words, "Canceled Order Board Co. … Christian, 4 Or. 375 ; Ladd v. Mason, 10 Or. 308 ; People v. Greene, 74 Cal. 400 ( 16 Pac. 197 : 5 Am. St. Rep. *352 448 ); Lee v. O’Shaughnessy, 20 Minn. 173 ( Gil. 157 ); Hanson v. Wolcott, 19 Kan. 207 .”

Sig. C. Mayer & Co. v. Smith

112 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

Cardiff, 266 Fed. 753, 764 ; Reed v. Randall, 29 N. Y. 358 ( 86 Am. Dec. 305 , 308, and note, p. 314); Hills v. McDonald, 17 Wis. 100 ; Meyer v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co., 193 Fed. 857 ( 113 C. C. … Bean, Burnett and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Blake

292 Or. 486 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1982

Brown, Atty. Gen., John R. McCulloch, Jr., Sol. Gen. and William F. Gary, Deputy Sol. Gen., Salem. DENECKE, Chief Justice. … Tharalson v. State Dept. of Revenue, 281 Or. 9, 13 , 573 P.2d 298 (1978).

Ex parte Kerby

103 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1922

Eason v. … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

Stines v. Oregon State Employes Ass'n

287 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1979

v. … General Motors, 373 US 734 , 83 S Ct 1453 , 10 L Ed 2d 670 (1963), as applied by the Court of Appeals in OSEA v. Oregon State University, 30 Or App 757 , 567 P2d 1085 (1977).

Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Employment Division

302 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1986

An Employment Division referee determined that claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits, and the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) affirmed. … See Sager v. *143 McClenden, 296 Or 33, 37 , 672 P2d 697 (1983); Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Ed Dist, 286 Or 261, 267 , 593 P2d 1152 (1979). ORS 183.497 was enacted in 1981. Or Laws 1981, ch 871, § 1.

Myers v. Olds

121 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1927

BROWN, J. We will take up the questions in the order in which they are set out above. … Kelley v. Bourne, 15 Or. 476 ( 16 Pac. 40 ). See, also, Willis v. Crawford, 38 Or. 522 ( 63 Pac. 985 , 64 Pac. 866 , 53 L. R. A. 904); Hanthorn v. Quinn, 42 Or. 1 ( 69 Pac. 817 ).