Case law

McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

296 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

The Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and allowed an award of benefits. We allowed review in this case and Leary v. … Pressures, dangers and general conditions of a fire fighter’s work are real stress, Baker v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 18 Cal App 3d 853, 96 Cal Rptr 279 (1971).

Adams v. Multnomah County

6 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

.: In this case the decision must turn upon the construction of the same section of the city charter of Portland that was under consideration in Multnomah County v. Adams, just decided. … Upon the question whether the remedy against the action of the county court sitting as a board of county commissioners in case of the rejection of a demand against the county is by writ of review we have not thought proper

Wilson v. Gilliam

110 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

the time of the sale the statute provided that: *167 “No bid or proposal for tbe sale of corrugated culverts to any county, city, town, municipal or other public corporation, or to the state of Oregon, or any department, board … See People v. Smith, 108 Mich. 527 ( 66 N. W. 382, 383 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 715 , 32 L. R. A. 853). It is to be observed that the statute has no application to sales between private persons.

State v. Hibberd

123 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1927

BROWN, J. … This proposition is sustained by State v. Barker, 64 Mo. 282 ; State v. Beatty, 90 Mo. 143 ( 2 S. W. 215 ); Snowden v. State, 62 Miss. 100 ; People v. Fagan, 66 Cal. 534 ( 6 Pac. 394 ); People v.

Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County

87 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

It provides that a taxpayer aggrieved by the assessment of his property and who is denied relief by the board of equalization,, may appeal to the Circuit Court. … Wichita Falls Co. v. Holloman, 28 Okl. 419 ( 114 Pac. 700 , 25 Ann.

Scott v. Bothwell

243 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1966

See Brown v. Gamble, 60 Wash2d 376, 374 P2d 151 (1962); McUne v. Fuqua, 42 Wash2d 65, 253 P2d 632 (1953); Scholz v. Leuer, 7 Wash2d 76, 109 P2d 294 (1941). … Erickson v. Rossi, — Wash2d —, 396 P2d 170 (1964), and cases cited therein. In practice, however, as will be seen from McUne v. Fuqua, supra, and Parrish v.

Higgs v. McDuffie

81 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1916

For illustration, suppose Brown, without giving any personal obligation on his part, mortgages his land to secure the promissory note of Smith. … Assn. v.

Jackman v. Short

165 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1940

and tuition in a boarding school “is excessive in so far as it represents expenses for education in a boarding school rather than in a public high school, in view of the fact that the father believes, with some showing of … To the above decisions there should be added: Hilliard v. Anderson, 197 Ill. 549 , 64 N. E. 326 ; Morris v. Morris, 92 Ind. App. 65 , 171 N. E. 386 ; Luques v. Luques, 127 Me. 356 , 143 Atl. 263 ; Underwood v.

State ex rel. Rudd v. Ringold

102 Or. 401 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1921

(Parrish v. Stephens, 1 Or. 73 ; Esson v. Wattier, 25 Or. 7 , 34 Pac. 756 ; Blagen v. Smith, 34 Or. 394 , 56 Pac. 292 , 44 L. R. A. 522).” … Lappius, 3 Or. 56; Mackin *407 v. Portland Gas. Co., 38 Or. 120 ( 61 Pac. 134 , 62 Pac. 20 , 49 L. R. A. 596); McGee v. Beckley, 54 Or. 250 ( 102 Pac. 303 , 103 Pac. 61 ); State ex rel. v.

Brennen v. Derby

124 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1928

BROWN, J. In support of her complaint, plaintiff testified that she was twenty-one years of age and had resided in the Steiger family since her infancy. … Under the doctrine announced by the case of Cooper v.

Ganoe v. Ohmart

118 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1926

Appellant claims 50 per cent of a fee of $50 earned by the firm in Spence v. Hull. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

State of Oregon v. CERRUTI

188 Or. 103 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1950

R. 1120; Creighton v. Board of Water Commissioners, 143 N. C. 171 , 55 S. E. 511 (value of annual hay crop); Brainerd v. State, supra; Stolze v. Manitowoc Terminal Co., 100 Wis. 208 , 75 N. W. 987 ; City of Cushing v. … Board of County Commissioners, 105 Colo. 366 , 98 P. (2d) 283 ; Wassenich v. Denver, 67 Colo. 456 , 186 P. 533 .

Marsters v. Isensee

97 Or. 567 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1920

On the evening of November 28, 1917, the plaintiff, who was then a teacher in a night school, boarded the Mississippi Avenue car at a point north of Broadway, at 9:15 p. m. to return to her home. … Co., 40 Or. 6 ( 66 Pac. 270 ); Donohoe v. Portland Ry. Co., 56 Or. 58 ( 107 Pac. 964 .)

Bailey v. Stevens Auto Sales, Inc.

266 Or. 294 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1973

See Vendrell v. Sch. Dist. 26C, Malheur Co., 233 Or 1 , 376 P2d 406 (1962). Also, Franks v. Smith, 251 Or 98 , 444 P2d 954 (1968). … See Ritter v. Beals, supra at 520. Defendants point to our opinion in Studer v.

Re Assignment of Pendleton Hardware Co.

24 Or. 330 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1893

In such case it has been adjudged that a recovery can be had on the money counts, by the actual creditor, where money passed between the parties in the action ”: Foster v. Shattuck, 2 N. H. 446. … J., in Mitchell v. Powers, 17 Or. 491 ( 21 Pac. 451 ), in which he says: “The presentment of a claim in such a case requires more than a mere demand of a sum of money.

Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Assn.

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2025

See Lowe v. … But that case, Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No C 11-03082 LB, 2014 WL 6483216 (ND Cal Nov 18, 2014), again highlights the challenges I think plain- tiffs will face in the next stage of this litigation.

Atkeson v. Holly

258 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1971

Toomey v. Moore et ux, 213 Or 422, 431-432 , 325 P2d 805 (1958); In re Lobb’s Will, 177 Or 162, 188 , 160 P2d *282 295 (1945); but see In re Brown’s Estate, 165 Or 575, 586 , 108 P2d 775 (1941). … See, e.g., Ramstead v. Bridges, 175 Or 182, 190 , 152 P2d 306 (1944); In re Rupert’s Estate, 152 Or 649 , 54 P2d 274 (1936). There is language in Gilliam v.

Mozorosky v. Hurlburt

106 Or. 274 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1921

BROWN, J. 6. … A. 187); Bohn v. Brown, 33 Mich. 257 ; Cable v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371 ( 72 Am. Dec. 214 ); Cable v. Gaty, 34 Mo. 573 ( 86 Am. Dec. 126 ); Doolittle v. Marsh, 11 Neb. 243 , 9 N.

Holladay v. Holladay

13 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1886

Subsequently the bank foreclosed the pledge, and sold the stocks, which were bid in by one Thomas Brown, and held in trust for said bank. … (Van Husen v. Kanouse, 13 Mich. 303 .)

Stevenson v. State Ex Rel. Department of Transportation

290 Or. 3 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

Lane, of Brown, Hughes, Bird & Lane, Grants Pass, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner Dale Stevenson. William E. … Emmanuel Lutheran Charity Board ( State Bd. of Higher Ed. ), 35 Or. App. 465 at 468-69 , 582 P.2d 443 (1978), the Court of Appeals observed: "The issue of immunity may properly be raised by demurrer, Smith v.