Case law

United States F. & G. Co. v. Bramwell

108 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

Fidelity Deposit Co., 101 Miss. 823 ( 58 South. 713 ); Keckley v. Keckley, 2 Hill’s Eq. (S. C.) Ch. 250; Commissioners etc. v. Greenwood, 1 Desaus. (S. C.) 450; Brown v. American Bonding Co., 210 Fed. 844 ( 127 C. C. … Our attention has also been directed by the defendant to the language of the court in Brown v.

Moen v. Peterson

312 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

In Lyons v. … Felons sentenced under this statute are not eligible for release on parole until they have served the minimum term, unless a majority of the Board of Parole votes for earlier release.

Meader v. Farmers' Mutual Fire Relief Ass'n

137 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 4, 1931

Justice Brown, construed the standard mortgage clause reading: “If, with the consent of this company, an interest under this policy shall exist in favor of a mortgagee or of any person or corporation having an interest in … Co. of Hartford, Conn., v. Baker, 71 Ind. 102 ; Excelsior Fire Ins. Co. v. Royal Ins. Co., 55 N. Y. 343 , 14 Am. Rep. 271 ; DeWolf v. Capital City Ins. Co., 16 Hun (N. Y.) 116; Kent v. Aetna Ins. Co., 82 N. Y.

Hickerson v. Jossey

131 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1929

See Hanser v. Youngs, 212 Mich. 508 ( 180 N. W. 409 ); Mills v. Philadelphia, 187 Pa. 287 ; Wurl v. Watson, 67 Cal. … Brown and Belt, JJ., absent.

McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

296 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

The Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and allowed an award of benefits. We allowed review in this case and Leary v. … Pressures, dangers and general conditions of a fire fighter’s work are real stress, Baker v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 18 Cal App 3d 853, 96 Cal Rptr 279 (1971).

State v. Evans

98 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1920

State v. … In State v.

Beekman v. Hamlin

10 L.R.A. 454 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1890

Foulk v Brown, 2 Watts, 216 . So in Tilgman v. … Willingham, 47 Ga. 540 ; Whitney v. French, 25 Vt. 663 ; Anderson v. Settle, 37 Tenn. 202 ; Diamond v. Tobias, 12 Penn. St. 312; Reynolds v. Green, 10 Mich. 356 ; Howland v. Shirtliff, 2 Met. 26 ; Anderson v.

Ford v. Schall

110 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1924

BROWN, J. The defendant has petitioned this court for a rehearing and for a modification of the opinion filed January 14, 1924. … Anderson v. Stayton State Bank, 82 Or. 357, 373 ( 159 Pac. 1033, 1039 ). See 13 C. J. 576.

Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2016

Shell v. … Still later in that hearing, Vice-Chair Walt Brown asked how, specifically, the proposed amendment would change existing law.

Adams v. Multnomah County

6 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

.: In this case the decision must turn upon the construction of the same section of the city charter of Portland that was under consideration in Multnomah County v. Adams, just decided. … Upon the question whether the remedy against the action of the county court sitting as a board of county commissioners in case of the rejection of a demand against the county is by writ of review we have not thought proper

Bohr v. Tillamook County Creamery Assn.

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 3, 2025

See Lowe v. … But that case, Brown v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc., No C 11-03082 LB, 2014 WL 6483216 (ND Cal Nov 18, 2014), again highlights the challenges I think plain- tiffs will face in the next stage of this litigation.

Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.

139 Or. 198 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1932

Rep. 364 ); Bingham v. Lipman, 40 Or. 363 ( 67 P. 98 ); and such seems to be the rule whether corporations or individuals are involved: Gill v. Selling, 125 Or. 597 ( 267 P. 812 , 58 A. L. R. 1556). … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur. Petition for rehearing denied March 22, 1932

Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County

87 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

It provides that a taxpayer aggrieved by the assessment of his property and who is denied relief by the board of equalization,, may appeal to the Circuit Court. … Wichita Falls Co. v. Holloman, 28 Okl. 419 ( 114 Pac. 700 , 25 Ann.

State v. Cloutier

286 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1979

See, e.g., Simpson v. United States, 435 US 6 , 11 and n. 5, 98 S Ct 909 , 55 L Ed 2d 70 (1978); Brown v. Ohio, 432 US 161, 165-166 , 97 S Ct 2221 , 53 L Ed 2d 187, 194 (1977). II In State v. … We also found that constitutional problems under State v. Brown, supra, and State v. Boyd, supra, had been obviated by the state’s willingness to consolidate the charges.

Wilson v. Gilliam

110 Or. 165 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

the time of the sale the statute provided that: *167 “No bid or proposal for tbe sale of corrugated culverts to any county, city, town, municipal or other public corporation, or to the state of Oregon, or any department, board … See People v. Smith, 108 Mich. 527 ( 66 N. W. 382, 383 , 62 Am. St. Rep. 715 , 32 L. R. A. 853). It is to be observed that the statute has no application to sales between private persons.

Douglas County Road Co. v. County of Douglas

6 Or. 299 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

The matter involved herein first came before this court in the suit of The Douglas County Road Co. v. Abraham et al., decided at the December term, 1874, and reported in 5 Or. 322 . … The recital of the contract is that it was made and concluded by the county court— composed of a county judge and two county commissioners, whose names are given, sitting as a board to do county business.

McVaigh v. Sandberg

266 Or. 409 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1973

Defendants rely on Delacroix v. Sanders, 219 Or 494 , 347 P2d 966 (1959); Anderson v. Oregon City Hospital Co., 214 Or 212 , 328 P2d 769 , 71 ALR2d 431 (1958); and Vinson v. Brown, 193 Or 113 , 237 P2d 501 (1951). … See Utley v. City of Independence, *417 240 Or 384, 392-93 , 402 P2d 91 (1965); Hryciuk v. Robinson, 213 Or 542, 566 , 326 P2d 424 (1958).

Jackman v. Short

165 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1940

and tuition in a boarding school “is excessive in so far as it represents expenses for education in a boarding school rather than in a public high school, in view of the fact that the father believes, with some showing of … To the above decisions there should be added: Hilliard v. Anderson, 197 Ill. 549 , 64 N. E. 326 ; Morris v. Morris, 92 Ind. App. 65 , 171 N. E. 386 ; Luques v. Luques, 127 Me. 356 , 143 Atl. 263 ; Underwood v.

Carruthers v. Port of Astoria

249 Or. 329 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1968

They were placed in constitutions *335 in order that pressures of the moment could not overwhelm legislatures, municipal governing boards and councils, and even local elections. … Newberry v. City of Andalusia et al, 257 Ala 49, 57 So2d 629 (1952); DeArmond v. Alaska State Development Corporation, 376 P2d 717, 721 (Alaska 1962); Roan v.

State v. Hibberd

123 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1927

BROWN, J. … This proposition is sustained by State v. Barker, 64 Mo. 282 ; State v. Beatty, 90 Mo. 143 ( 2 S. W. 215 ); Snowden v. State, 62 Miss. 100 ; People v. Fagan, 66 Cal. 534 ( 6 Pac. 394 ); People v.