Case law

Nielsen v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.

76 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1915

Shasta Water Co., 71 Or. 566 ( 143 Pac. 917 ); Schulte v. Pacific Paper Co., 67 Or. 334 ( 135 Pac. 527 , 136 Pac. 5 ); Dunn v. Orchard Land & Timber Co., 68 Or. 97 ( 136 Pac. 872, 874 ); Browning v. Smiley-Lampert Lbr. … Co., 68 Or. 502 ( 137 Pac. 777, 779 ); Schaller v. Pacific Brick Co., 70 Or. 557 ( 139 Pac. 913 ); Isaacson v. Beaver Logging Co., 73 Or. 28 ( 143 Pac. 938 ); Cam *516 eron v.

Dant & Russell, Inc. v. Ostlind

148 Or. 204 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1934

Scott, 20 Or. 421 ( 26 P. 276 ); Wilson v. Wilson, 26 Or. 251 ( 38 P. 185 ); Bank of Freewater v. Kyett, 137 Or. 193 ( 1 P. (2d) 1113 ); U. S. Rubber Company v. Kimsey, 145 Or. 73 ( 26 P. (2d) 565 ); Johnson v. … Curl, 147 Or. 530 ( 33 P. (2d) 237 ); Moore v. Prussing, 165 Ill. 319 ( 46 N. E. 184 ); Faris v. Beck, 74 Colo. 480 ( 222 P. 652 ); Security National Bank v.

State v. Brake

99 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 1921

As the car left Oregon City, Brake was behind the front seat, but “was leaning on the front seat,” and he wore “a soft brown hat.” … W. 362 ); Cole v. Andrews, 74 Minn. 93 ( 76 N. W. 962 ); Marks v. Beyfus, 25 Q. B. Div. 494.

George v. Oregon, California & Eastern Railway Co.

118 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1926

In Osborn v. … Coshow, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur. •

State Ex Rel. Security Savings & Trust Co. v. School District No. 9

148 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 12, 1934

W. 471 ); State v. Bailey, 19 Ind. 452 ; State v. Lathrop School District, 314 Mo. 315 ( 284 S. W. 135 ); State v. Missouri Utilities Co., 331 Mo. 337 ( 53 S. W. (2d) 394, 399 , 89 A. L. R. 607); State v. … In O’Leary v. Reiner, 9 N. J.

Kadderly v. Portland

44 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1903

It will also be observed that it provides for cases wherein the proceedings of a board of public works were irregular or defective. … There is no board of public works provided for in the charter of 1903, but there was a board of public works provided for in the charter of 1898—the charter in force at the time of *160 the adoption of the charter of 1903

State v. Mishler

81 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1916

Carr, 6 Or. 133 ; State v. Ah Sam, 14 Or. 347 ( 13 Pac. 303 ); State v. Lee, 17 Or. 488 ( 21 Pac. 455 ); State v. Light, 17 Or. 358 ( 21 Pac. 132 ); State v. Shaw, 22 Or. 287 ( 29 Pac. 1028 ); State v. … PI. & Pr., §§ 213-218; Brown v. People, 173 Ill. 34 [ 50 N. E. 106 ]; State v. *555 Stimson, 24 N. J. Law, 9; Bork v. People, 16 Hun [N. Y.], 476; Reside v. State, 10 Tex. App. 675; Grant v.

United States F. & G. Co. v. Bramwell

108 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

Fidelity Deposit Co., 101 Miss. 823 ( 58 South. 713 ); Keckley v. Keckley, 2 Hill’s Eq. (S. C.) Ch. 250; Commissioners etc. v. Greenwood, 1 Desaus. (S. C.) 450; Brown v. American Bonding Co., 210 Fed. 844 ( 127 C. C. … Our attention has also been directed by the defendant to the language of the court in Brown v.

Moen v. Peterson

312 Or. 503 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1991

In Lyons v. … Felons sentenced under this statute are not eligible for release on parole until they have served the minimum term, unless a majority of the Board of Parole votes for earlier release.

Hickerson v. Jossey

131 Or. 612 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1929

See Hanser v. Youngs, 212 Mich. 508 ( 180 N. W. 409 ); Mills v. Philadelphia, 187 Pa. 287 ; Wurl v. Watson, 67 Cal. … Brown and Belt, JJ., absent.

Parker v. Rogers

8 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1879

(Lamb v. Davenport, 1 Sawyer, 609.) The words in said bond, “with a full reservation of all and every privilege around said lot, ” were undoubtedly intended to operate as a reservation of the right to build a wharf. … At the time the application for purchase of the land in controversy was *191 made to tlie state board, Parker had the exclusive right to purchase the land from the state, and the deed from the state should have been given

McGarrah v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

296 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

The Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and allowed an award of benefits. We allowed review in this case and Leary v. … Pressures, dangers and general conditions of a fire fighter’s work are real stress, Baker v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 18 Cal App 3d 853, 96 Cal Rptr 279 (1971).

Beekman v. Hamlin

10 L.R.A. 454 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1890

Foulk v Brown, 2 Watts, 216 . So in Tilgman v. … Willingham, 47 Ga. 540 ; Whitney v. French, 25 Vt. 663 ; Anderson v. Settle, 37 Tenn. 202 ; Diamond v. Tobias, 12 Penn. St. 312; Reynolds v. Green, 10 Mich. 356 ; Howland v. Shirtliff, 2 Met. 26 ; Anderson v.

State v. Cloutier

286 Or. 579 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1979

See, e.g., Simpson v. United States, 435 US 6 , 11 and n. 5, 98 S Ct 909 , 55 L Ed 2d 70 (1978); Brown v. Ohio, 432 US 161, 165-166 , 97 S Ct 2221 , 53 L Ed 2d 187, 194 (1977). II In State v. … We also found that constitutional problems under State v. Brown, supra, and State v. Boyd, supra, had been obviated by the state’s willingness to consolidate the charges.

Ford v. Schall

110 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1924

BROWN, J. The defendant has petitioned this court for a rehearing and for a modification of the opinion filed January 14, 1924. … Anderson v. Stayton State Bank, 82 Or. 357, 373 ( 159 Pac. 1033, 1039 ). See 13 C. J. 576.

Adams v. Multnomah County

6 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1876

.: In this case the decision must turn upon the construction of the same section of the city charter of Portland that was under consideration in Multnomah County v. Adams, just decided. … Upon the question whether the remedy against the action of the county court sitting as a board of county commissioners in case of the rejection of a demand against the county is by writ of review we have not thought proper

Herron v. Rose City Transit Co.

247 Or. 616 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1967

She slipped and fell on a snow-covered, rutted and icy street while walking from the curb to board defendant’s bus. A more complete statement of the facts can be found in the opinion of this court on a previous appeal. … See Herron v. Rose City Transit Co., 243 Or 64 , 411 P2d 445 (1966). Plaintiff here appeals from an adverse judgment entered upon a jury verdict.

State v. Evans

98 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1920

State v. … In State v.

Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County

87 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

It provides that a taxpayer aggrieved by the assessment of his property and who is denied relief by the board of equalization,, may appeal to the Circuit Court. … Wichita Falls Co. v. Holloman, 28 Okl. 419 ( 114 Pac. 700 , 25 Ann.

Smith v. Clackamas County

252 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1969

Clary v. Polk County, 231 Or 148 , 372 P2d 524 (1962). The recovery under the strietliability statute was limited to $2,000. … The plaintiff relies upon Spicer v. Benefit Ass’n of Ry.