Case law

Brookshire v. Johnson

274 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1976

Draper v. Mullenex, 225 Or 267 , 357 P2d 519 (1960); Kern et al v. Gentner, 176 Or 479 , 159 P2d 190 (1945). … Hewitt v. Lane County, supra, was followed by the Court of Appeals in Boggs v. Multnomah County, 2 Or App 517 , 470 P2d 159 (1970).

Marks v. Wilson

72 Or. 5 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1914

This question is disposed of by the two cases in this court of Smith v. Whiting, 55 Or. 393 ( 106 Pac. 791 ), and Browne v. … Co. v. Northern Mining & Trading Co., 152 Fed. 145 ( 81 C. C. A. 363); Eadie v. Chambers, 172 Fed. 81 ( 96 C. C. A. 561 ,18 Ann. Cas. 1096, 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 879).

State v. Ross

55 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1909

In Baldwin v. … The Trust Company could only become an active depository of this fund by authority of its officers and board of directors.

YMCA v. Dept. of Rev.

308 Or. 644 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1989

See Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or. 217, 230 , 621 P.2d 547 (1980); *1089 Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or. 293 , 605 P.2d 273 (1980). … In Friendsview Manor v.

Martin v. Glenbrook Farms Corp.

110 Or. 87 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1924

Without such request ruling and exception, the trial court violated no duty to the defendant: State v. Pointer, 106 Or. 589, 602 ( 213 Pac. 621 ). … Bean, Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Fitzgerald v. Nelson

159 Or. 264 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 10, 1938

V That on or about the 26th day of December, 1933, the said Susan D. … Brown, 129 Wash. 196 ( 224 P. 930 ). The Washington case was an action at law and the mistake inducing the cancellation was one of law.

Forrester v. City of Hillsboro

156 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1937

unless the same is authorized by city ordinance or resolution, and made in writing by order of the common council, signed by the auditor and police judge on behalf of the city; except that this section shall not apply to the board … Citing Montague-O’Reilly v. Milwaukie, 101 Or. 478 ( 193 P. 824 , 199 P. 605 ); Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ). Also see the later case of Kernin v.

Warrenton Lumber Co. v. Smith

117 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1926

Co. v. … Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.), 156 S. W. 1102 , note; Greenlee v. Mosnat, 116 Iowa, 535 ( 90 N. W. 338 ); Johnson v. Simmons, 76 Minn. 34 . ( 78 N. W. 863 ).

Lambert v. Glover

108 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1923

BROWN, J. Plaintiff filed a bill in equity and averred her right to compensation as a disappointed beneficiary under the provisions of the will of her father, Philip Glover. … In the case of George Glover v. John P. Glover et al., 215 Pac. 990 , a companion case decided by this court June 12, 1923, we held that, the court did not commit error in sustaining a like demurrer.

Samuels v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.

128 Or. 600 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1929

Ordinarily a question of waiver is one of fact for the jury to determine: Endicott v. Digerness, 103 Or. 555 ( 205 Pac. 975 ); Mechem on Sales, § 612. … Bean, Brown and Band, JJ., concur./

Sun Dial Ranch v. May Land Co.

61 Or. 205 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1912

Carpenter v. Board of Com’rs, 56 Minn. 513, 522 ( 58 N. W. 295, 297 ). Mr. Justice CURTIS in the case of Howard v. Ingersoll, 13 How. 426, 427 ( 14 L. … See, also, Bowlby v. Shively, 22 Or. 410 ( 30 Pac. 154 ), and Taylor *217 Sands Fishing Co. v. State Land Board, 56 Or. 157, 161 ( 108 Pac. 126 ), wherein Mr.

McCall v. Inter Harbor Navigation Co.

154 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1936

Co. v. Industrial Comm., 192 Wis. 362 ( 212 N. W. 641 , 57 A. L. … In Hallum v. Omro, 122 Wis. 337 , 99 N.

State v. Mishler

81 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1916

Carr, 6 Or. 133 ; State v. Ah Sam, 14 Or. 347 ( 13 Pac. 303 ); State v. Lee, 17 Or. 488 ( 21 Pac. 455 ); State v. Light, 17 Or. 358 ( 21 Pac. 132 ); State v. Shaw, 22 Or. 287 ( 29 Pac. 1028 ); State v. … PI. & Pr., §§ 213-218; Brown v. People, 173 Ill. 34 [ 50 N. E. 106 ]; State v. *555 Stimson, 24 N. J. Law, 9; Bork v. People, 16 Hun [N. Y.], 476; Reside v. State, 10 Tex. App. 675; Grant v.

In Re Norton's Estate

175 Or. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1944

V. … Durkheimer Investment Co. v. Zell, et al , 161 Or. 434 , 90 P.2d 213 ; Abrahamson, et al v. Northwestern Pulp Paper Co., et al , 141 Or. 339 , 15 P.2d 472 , 17 P.2d 1117 ; Watkins v. Mason , 11 Or. 72 , 4 P. 524 .

Nielsen v. Portland Gas & Coke Co.

76 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1915

Shasta Water Co., 71 Or. 566 ( 143 Pac. 917 ); Schulte v. Pacific Paper Co., 67 Or. 334 ( 135 Pac. 527 , 136 Pac. 5 ); Dunn v. Orchard Land & Timber Co., 68 Or. 97 ( 136 Pac. 872, 874 ); Browning v. Smiley-Lampert Lbr. … Co., 68 Or. 502 ( 137 Pac. 777, 779 ); Schaller v. Pacific Brick Co., 70 Or. 557 ( 139 Pac. 913 ); Isaacson v. Beaver Logging Co., 73 Or. 28 ( 143 Pac. 938 ); Cam *516 eron v.

DeForce v. Welch

10 Or. 507 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1883

Justice Boise in Rodgers v. … Justice Boise, in Parker v.

Vogl v. Department of Revenue

327 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1998

See Taylor v. Mult. Dep. Sher. Ret. … The board shall then calculate a percentage that is equal to that fraction multiplied by the multiplier determined by the board under paragraph (a) of this subsection.

Southern Pacific Co. v. Oregon Growers Co-Operative Ass'n

127 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1928

The pears were loaded on board cars and delivered to the carrier as one of the steps consummating their sale to Alvarino & Alfonso, but Alvarino & Alfonso *375 were not named as consignors or consignees. … Bean, Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

George v. Oregon, California & Eastern Railway Co.

118 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1926

In Osborn v. … Coshow, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur. •

Pennzoil Co. v. Department of Revenue

332 Or. 542 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2001

In return, Getty agreed to place Pennzoil officers in key positions on the Getty board of directors. … See Hoechst Celanese Corporation v. Franchise Tax Board, 106 Cal Rptr 2d 548, 563, 22 P3d 324 (2001) (nature of transaction or activity that gave rise to income is critical factor); Western Natural Gas Co. v.