Case law

Carroll v. McLaren

60 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1911

This is the holding in O’Hara v. Parker, 27 Or. 156 ( 39 Pac. 1004 ), and in State v. Blize, 37 Or. 404 ( 61 Pac. 735 ), and it is fully discussed in Maxwell v. Frazier, 52 Or. 183, 187 ( 96 Pac, 548 : 18 L. R. A. [N. … Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 216 : 222 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 : 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or. 173 ( 96 Pac. 124 : 1065); Gallagher v. Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 ); Wilson v.

Supove v. Densmoor Et Ux

225 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1961

Weatherford v. Weatherford et al., 199 Or 290 , 257 P2d 263 , 260 P2d 1097 . See also Cohn v. Duntley, 147 Or 176 , 31 P2d 170 ; Brown v. Briggs, 134 Or 184 , 292 P 1034 . … Contrs. v. Slate Const.

Martin v. Glenbrook Farms Corp.

110 Or. 87 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1924

Without such request ruling and exception, the trial court violated no duty to the defendant: State v. Pointer, 106 Or. 589, 602 ( 213 Pac. 621 ). … Bean, Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Parker v. Rogers

8 Or. 183 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1879

(Lamb v. Davenport, 1 Sawyer, 609.) The words in said bond, “with a full reservation of all and every privilege around said lot, ” were undoubtedly intended to operate as a reservation of the right to build a wharf. … At the time the application for purchase of the land in controversy was *191 made to tlie state board, Parker had the exclusive right to purchase the land from the state, and the deed from the state should have been given

White v. Multnomah County

74 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1914

Such rules adopted by the board of aldermen of Boston were held to be legal by publication once in several Boston papers: Commonwealth v. Matthews, 122 Mass. 60 . … In Brewer v.

Smith v. Clackamas County

252 Or. 230 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1969

Clary v. Polk County, 231 Or 148 , 372 P2d 524 (1962). The recovery under the strietliability statute was limited to $2,000. … The plaintiff relies upon Spicer v. Benefit Ass’n of Ry.

State v. Seize

37 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1900

Jur. § 76 ; Frink v. Thomas, 20 Or. 265 (12 L. R. A. 239, 25 Pac. 717 ); Scott v. Walton, 32 Or. 460 ( 52 Pac. 180 ); Vaughn v. Smith, 34 Or. 54 ( 55 Pac. 99 ); Och v. Mo. K. & T. Ry. Co. 130 Mo. 27 ( 31 S. … But, as said in O'Hara v.

Klorfine v. Cole

121 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1927

BROWN, J. In some jurisdictions in this country, estates by entirety have never been recognized, while in others such estates have been abolished by statute. … Horton, 46 Or. 597 ( 81 Pac. 386 ); Oliver v. Wright, 47 Or. 322 ( 83 Pac. 870 ); Chase v. McKenzie, 81 Or. 429 ( 159 Pac. 1025 ); Heacock v. Loder, 106 Or. 323 ( 211 Pac. 950 ); Stout v.

Duby v. Hicks

105 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1922

Patterson v. Patterson, supra. *34 In McCall v. … Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Harris concur.

First Nat. Bank of Burns v. Frazier

143 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1933

Moreover, it is not necessary that the actions of a board of directors be evidenced by written resolutions: Markham v. Loveland, 69 Or. 451 ( 138 P. 483 ); Mann v. W. A. Gordon Co., 77 Or. 457 ( 151 P. 704 ). … In Doolittle v.

Estate of Kukas

120 Or. 542 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1927

labored for Banzer in the manner stated, and Brunk goes further and gives in detail the number of days each of the indi *545 vidual claimants worked, and the rate per day and the number of days chargeable against them for board … There was practically the same holding in the case of Bull v.

Lane v. Beveridge

135 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1930

Lane and Elisabeth Lane v. J. E. Shears *560 and Mary Shears and Josephine Evans and H. C. Keck. … Brown, Belt and Campbell, JJ., concur.

State v. Parkins

346 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 2009

— long enough to pull it into a pony tail — big bones that stuck out — cheek bones and chin, and had brown eyes.” … As noted, for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion in State v.

Ahonen v. Hryszko

90 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1918

Brown: I object to this as to what might possibly be underneath. I object to the witness testifying to anything he does not know. “The Court: Objection overruled. Exception allowed. “To which the witness answered: “A. … The doctrine of substitution of parties was examined in Service & Wright Co. v. Sumpter Valley Ry.

State v. Richardson

48 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1906

. & Pr. 753; State v. Gibbs, 13 Fla. 55 ( 7 Am. Rep. 233 ); State v. Bailey, 7 Iowa, 390 ; Union Pacific Ry. Co. v. Hall, 91 U. S. 343 ( 23 L. Ed. 428 ). 1. … Morris, 5 Or. 24 ; Baldock v. Atwood, 21 Or. 73 ( 26 Pac. 1058 ); Talbot v. Garretson, 31 Or. 256 ( 49 Pac. 978 ); Lieuallen v. Mosgrove, 37 Or. 446 ( 61 Pac. 1022 ); York v. Nash, 42 Or. 321 ( 71 Pac. 59 ). 5.

State Highway Commission v. Deal

191 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1951

Board of Railroad Commissioners, 162 Mass. 81 , 38 N.E. 27 ; Heaton v. New York C. & H. R. R. Co., 149 N.Y.S. 71 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rowland, 70 Tex. 298 , 7 S.W. 718 ; Miller v. Seaboard *678 Air Line Ry. … United States, 261 U.S. 299, 306 , 43 S.Ct. 354 , 67 L.ed. 664; United States v. Benedict, 261 U.S. 294, 298 , 43 S.Ct. 357 , 67 L.ed. 662; Brown v.

Hubbard v. Town of Medford

20 Or. 315 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1891

The provisions of the charter of Medford, so far as they are applicable to the case in hand, are as follows. “ The board of trustees shall have power: 1. … The case of Mayor v.

Bash v. Fir Grove Cemeteries, Co.

282 Or. 677 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1978

See, Hovis v. City of Burns, supra. … State v. Pearson, 250 Or 54 , 440 P2d 229 (1968); Colby v. Larson, 208 Or 121 , 297 P2d 1073 , 299 P2d 1076 (1956).

Cook v. Kane

13 Or. 482 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1886

Upon this state of facts, we are to inquire whether the piano is chargeable with an innkeeper’s lien for board and lodging furnished his guest. … In Broadwood v.

Horn v. Elgin Warehouse Co.

96 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1920

In Herrlin v. … Mulkey, 14 Or. 59 ( 12 Pac. 76 ); Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line R. Co., 21 Or. 136 ( 27 Pac. 91 ); Wild v. Oregon Short Line R. Co., 21 Or. 159 ( 27 Pac. 954 ); White v.