Case law

Lavigne v. Portland Traction Co.

179 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1946

See Weinstein v. … Fredenthal v. Brown, 52 Or. 33, 41, 42 , 95 P. 1114 . In our opinion there is no evidence in this case of negligence on the part of the defendant, and the judgment of involuntary nonsuit is, therefore, affirmed.

Hernandez v. Thrasher

374 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 2025

According to a “State of Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision Order of Supervision Conditions” attached to plaintiff’s petition, she was released onto post-prison supervision (PPS). 646 … Hernandez v.

Supove v. Densmoor Et Ux

225 Or. 365 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1961

Weatherford v. Weatherford et al., 199 Or 290 , 257 P2d 263 , 260 P2d 1097 . See also Cohn v. Duntley, 147 Or 176 , 31 P2d 170 ; Brown v. Briggs, 134 Or 184 , 292 P 1034 . … Contrs. v. Slate Const.

State v. Broom

135 Or. 641 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1931

*643 BROWN, J. The charging part of the indictment reads: “The said Mark Broom and Mrs. Mark Broom acting together on the 3d day of September, A. … PI. & Pr., 364; 25 Cyc. 86; Chesnut v. People, 21 Colo. 512 ( 42 P. 656 ); Territory v. Pendry, 9 Mont. 67 ( 22 P. 760 ); Houston v. State, 13 Ark. 66 ; Lopez v. State, 20 Texas 780 ; Flannagan v.

Kosik v. George

253 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1969

Denison v. Dawes, 121 Me 402, 117 A 314 (1922); Levy v. Sherman, 185 Md 63, 43 A2d 25 (1945); In re *23 Estate of Mosier: Mosier v. … Simpson v. Simpson’s Ex’rs., 94 Ky 586, 23 SW 361 (1893); Spurlock v. Brown, 91 Tenn 241, 18 SW 868 (1892).

In re Nisley

365 Or. 793 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 2019

A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board determined that respondent had made one such false state- ment, in violation of BR 8.1(a)(1), and suspended him for 30 days. … misrepresented his CLE activities in an MCLE report and then lied to the Bar about it); In re Yacob, 318 Or 10, 860 P2d 811 (1993) (disbarment; lawyer had presented fabricated documents to Bar in response to inquiry); In re Brown

Atkochunas v. Gustafson

156 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1937

It was so held in the following cases: Security Savings Co. v. Mackenzie, 33 Or. 209 ( 52 P. 1046 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or, 454 ( 56 P. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642); Wollenberg v. … In Olson v.

White v. Multnomah County

74 Or. 96 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1914

Such rules adopted by the board of aldermen of Boston were held to be legal by publication once in several Boston papers: Commonwealth v. Matthews, 122 Mass. 60 . … In Brewer v.

Johnson v. Clark Equipment Company

274 Or. 403 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1976

.”); Brown v. … See Williams v. Brown Mfg. Co., 45 Ill 2d 418, 261 NE2d 305 , 46 ALR3d 226 (1970); Restatement of Torts 2d, § 496D and comments thereto; W. Prosser, The Law of Torts 447, § 68 (4th ed 1971).

Doran v. State

270 Or. 758 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1974

OBS 157.070; State v. Etling, supra. In State v. … Silva v. State, 243 Or 187 , 412 P2d 375 (1966). ② See State v.

Carroll v. McLaren

60 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1911

This is the holding in O’Hara v. Parker, 27 Or. 156 ( 39 Pac. 1004 ), and in State v. Blize, 37 Or. 404 ( 61 Pac. 735 ), and it is fully discussed in Maxwell v. Frazier, 52 Or. 183, 187 ( 96 Pac, 548 : 18 L. R. A. [N. … Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 216 : 222 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 : 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or. 173 ( 96 Pac. 124 : 1065); Gallagher v. Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 ); Wilson v.

Stewart v. Altstock

22 Or. 182 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1892

Co. v. United States, 92 U. S. 733 . And this court in Brown v. … Foss v.

Duby v. Hicks

105 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1922

Patterson v. Patterson, supra. *34 In McCall v. … Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Harris concur.

Willamette Real Estate Co. v. Hendrix

28 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1895

Brown, 24 Or. 548 ( 34 Pac. 475 ). 5. … McEwan, 7 Or. 87 ; Hicklin v. McClear, 18 Or. 126 ( 22 Pac. 1057 ); Stewart *498 v. Harris, 9 Humph. 714 ; Bailey v. Carleton, 12 N. H. 9 ( 37 Am. Dec. 190 ); Denham v. Holeman, 26 Ga. 182 ( 71 Am. Dec. 198 ); Carson v.

Estate of Kukas

120 Or. 542 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1927

labored for Banzer in the manner stated, and Brunk goes further and gives in detail the number of days each of the indi *545 vidual claimants worked, and the rate per day and the number of days chargeable against them for board … There was practically the same holding in the case of Bull v.

Lane v. Beveridge

135 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1930

Lane and Elisabeth Lane v. J. E. Shears *560 and Mary Shears and Josephine Evans and H. C. Keck. … Brown, Belt and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Parker v. Kelsey

82 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1916

Thompson, 99 Ala 95 (11 South. 672)New Haven Trust Co. v. Camp, 83 Conn. 360 ( 76 Atl. 1100 ); Studstill v. Wilcox, 94 Ga. 690 ( 20 S. E. 120 ); Stewart v. Duffy, 116 Ill. 47 ( 6 N. E. 424 ); Wilson v. … W. 655 ); Davis v. Davis, 68 Miss. 478 ( 10 South. 70 ); Allen v. Mansfield, 108 Mo. 343 ( 18 S. W. 901 ); Tippenhauer v. Tippenhauer, 158 Ky. 639 ( 166 S. W. 225 ).

Bauman v. Clark

203 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1955

Clark, the plaintiff, brought suit for divorce, and the defendant Lydia V. Clark, by way of cross-complaint, sought a decree of separation from bed and board. … In Mignot v. Mignot we said: “* * * Under the rule of Adamson v.

Sizemore v. Myers

342 Or. 578 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2007

Marquez v. Screen Actors, 525 US 33, 46 , 119 S Ct 292 , 142 L Ed 2d 242 (1998); Pattern Makers v. NLRB, 473 US 95, 105-06 , 105 S Ct 3064 , 87 L Ed 2d 68 (1985); Labor Board v. … See Abood v.

State Highway Commission v. Deal

191 Or. 661 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1951

Board of Railroad Commissioners, 162 Mass. 81 , 38 N.E. 27 ; Heaton v. New York C. & H. R. R. Co., 149 N.Y.S. 71 ; Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Rowland, 70 Tex. 298 , 7 S.W. 718 ; Miller v. Seaboard *678 Air Line Ry. … United States, 261 U.S. 299, 306 , 43 S.Ct. 354 , 67 L.ed. 664; United States v. Benedict, 261 U.S. 294, 298 , 43 S.Ct. 357 , 67 L.ed. 662; Brown v.