Case law

Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.

196 Or. 608 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1952

Cottrell v. Prier, 191 Or 571, 575 , 231 P2d 788 ; Barnes v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 112 Or 41, 43 , 228 P 684 ; Graves v. … State v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 64 Or 421, 425 , 126 P 611 , 130 P 983 ; Inverarity v. Stowell, 10 Or 261, 265 . And see Bush v. Mitchell, supra.

Philbrick v. O'Connor

15 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1886

On the subject of notice in such case this court said, in Coolidge v. … John O’Connor, with whom appellant boarded, and with him; that the appellant paid eighteen hundred dollars for the property, which was worth nearly three times that sum; that the appellant was virtually without money or any

Liggett v. Ladd

17 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1888

that the Corvallis College was an educational institution located at Corvallis, Oregon, and duly incorporated under the laws of the.state, and the other defendants were persons claiming to be and assuming to act as the' board … The old case of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 , settled that question; besides, private corporations, by our constitution, can only be formed under general laws.

Shafford v. Reed

119 Or. 90 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1926

McLeod v. Griffs, 45 Ark. 505 .” … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Cook v. Leona Mills Lumber Co.

106 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1923

BROWN, J. 1. The disposition of this case depends upon the averments of the complaint and the meaning of our statute. … In Biehn v.

In Re Wakefield's Estate

161 Or. 330 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1939

The State Land Board, in the probate proceeding, asserted that there were no heirs. … The amendment (Ch. 191, § 1, Laws of Oregon 1915) was made subsequent to the decision in State v. McDonald, 55 Or. 419 , 103 P. 512 , 104 P. 967 , 972, 106 P. 444 . Hence such decision is not in point.

Southeast Portland Lumber Co. v. Corey

150 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1935

Co. v. Maher, 48 Ark. 522 ( 3 S. … There were approximately 440,000 board feet of saw logs located on the premises, at the time of the suit, and approximately 480,000 board feet of down timber which were foreclosed with the real estate.

Williams v. Dale

139 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1932

National Hospital Association , supra; Stires v. Sherwood , 75 Or. 108 ( 145 P. 645 ); Berkley v. Wilson , 87 Md. 219 ( 39 A. 502 ); Martin v. Cunningham , 93 Wn. 517 ( 161 P. 355 , L.R.A. 1918A, 225 ); Retelle v. … Justice RAND in McDonough v. National Hosital Ass'n , supra, we deem an extended discussion unnecessary. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. BROWN and BELT, JJ., concur. ROSSMAN, J., dissents.

Forrester v. City of Hillsboro

156 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1937

unless the same is authorized by city ordinance or resolution, and made in writing by order of the common council, signed by the auditor and police judge on behalf of the city; except that this section shall not apply to the board … Citing Montague-O’Reilly v. Milwaukie, 101 Or. 478 ( 193 P. 824 , 199 P. 605 ); Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irr. Dist., 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ). Also see the later case of Kernin v.

Schweiger v. Solbeck

191 Or. 454 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1951

V. … The *472 ¡soil was a loose, dark brown top soil, not clay soil. “That type of soil takes np water regulariy and in the time of heavy rain becomes more or less fluid.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eads

303 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1987

, and the board of governors as requested, subject only to the exercise of any applicable right or privilege.” … Tarpley, 122 Or 479 , 259 P 783 (1927); State ex rel McCourt v. Garland, 11 Or 92, 150 P 289 (1915); State ex rel McCourt v. Smith, 73 Or 96 , 144 P 424 (1914); Ex parte Kindt, 32 Or 474 , 52 P 187 (1898).

Smith v. Rubel

140 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 9, 1932

Powder Valley State Bank v. Hudelson, supra; Kern v. Feller, supra; Edwards v. Mt. Hood Construction Co., supra; Peterson v. Foss, 12 Or. 81 ( 6 P. 397 ); Hoxter v. Poppleton, supra. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Ex parte Tanner

49 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1907

In common parlance and for many purposes the word “conviction," *36 when used in a statute, means the judicial ascertainment of guilt by plea or verdict: Ex parte Brown, 68 Cal. 176 ( 8 Pac. 829 ); Commonwealth v. … People, 51 Ill. 311 ; Commonwealth v. Gorham, 99 Mass. 420 ; State v. Townley, 147 Mo. 205 ( 48 S. W. 833 ) ; Blaufus v. People, 69 N. Y. 107 ( 25 Am. Rep. 148 ) ; Smiths. Commonwealth, 14 Serg. & R. 69; Commonwealth v.

Kiernan v. City of Portland

61 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1912

In Sherlock v. … In Daviess County v.

Neal v. Haight

187 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1949

Weinstein v. Wheeler, 135 Or. 518 , 295 P. 196 , 296 P. 1079 ; Frederick & Nelson v, Bard, 74 Or. 457 , 145 P. 669 . In Timmins v. … “Q Did you have a running board? “A Yes, sir. “Q Did you see him step on the running board? “A I didn’t pay a bit of attention. He evidently must have stepped on it. “Q What are the physical facts about it?

Provolt v. Bailey

62 Or. 58 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1912

Stone, 9 Cal. 600 ; Coffman v. Robbins, 8 Or. 278 ; Edwards v. Allouez Mining Co., 38 Mich 46 ( 31 Am. Rep. 303 ). … Hayes, 39 Or. 97, 104 ( 65 Pac. 814 ) ; York v. Davidson, 39 Or. 81 ( 65 Pac. 819 ); Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co., 48 Or. 277 ( 86 Pac. 361 ).

Kadderly v. Portland

44 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1903

It will also be observed that it provides for cases wherein the proceedings of a board of public works were irregular or defective. … There is no board of public works provided for in the charter of 1903, but there was a board of public works provided for in the charter of 1898—the charter in force at the time of *160 the adoption of the charter of 1903

Collins v. Troy Laundry Co.

135 Or. 580 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1931

L.R. 812); Larsen v. State Ind. Acc. … J., Brown and Band, JJ., concur. Bossman, Belt and Kelly, JJ., dissent.

Garnsey v. County Court

33 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1898

Dayton v. Board of Equalization, 33 Or. 131 ( 50 Pac. 1009, 1012 ) ; Cal. & Oregon Land Co. v. Gowen, 48 Fed. 771 . … Pl. & Prac. 90, 98, 256; Ennis v. Ennis, 110 Ill. 78 ; Hamilton v. Harwood, 118 Ill. 154 ; People v. Dwinelle, 29 Cal. 632 ; Central Pac. R. Co. v. Board of Equalization, 46 Cal. 667 ; Alexander v.

Wasiljeff v. Hawley Paper Co.

68 Or. 487 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1914

The boards on the platform were loose. He had to watch, so that he would not fall down. The belt caught him by the hand and threw him in, and he did not remember any more. … In Perkins v.