Case law

Francisco v. Circle Tours Sightseeing Co.

125 Or. 80 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1928

The rule is tersely stated by former Chief Justice Bean in the case of Goss v. Southern Pac. Ry. Co., 48 Or. 439, 441 ( 87 Pac. 149 , 1 N. C. C. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Philbrick v. O'Connor

15 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1886

On the subject of notice in such case this court said, in Coolidge v. … John O’Connor, with whom appellant boarded, and with him; that the appellant paid eighteen hundred dollars for the property, which was worth nearly three times that sum; that the appellant was virtually without money or any

Eastern Oregon Mining Ass'n v. Department of Environmental Quality

360 Or. 10 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 14, 2016

Eachus, 320 Or 557, 888 P2d 562 (1988) (seven years); Hardy v. Land Board, 274 Or App 262, 360 P3d 647 (2015) (seven years); Bridgeview Vineyards, Inc. v. … State Land Board, 258 Or App 351, 309 P3d 1103 (2013) (14 years); G.A.S.P. v. Environmental Quality Commission, 198 Or App 182, 108 P3d 95 (2005) (eight years). 20 Eastern Oregon Mining Association v.

Patton v. J. C. Penney Co.

301 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 20, 1986

See also Brown v. … In Brewer v.

Philomath v. Ingle

41 Or. 289 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1902

Krimbel, 29 Or. 76 ( 43 Pac. 865 ); Booth v. Moody, 30 Or. 222 ( 46 Pac. 884 ); Hargett v. Beardsley, 33 Or. 301 ( 54 Pac. 203 ); Savage v. Savage, 36 Or. 268 ( 59 Pac. 461 ); Chan Sing v. … In Stackpole v.

General Electric Credit Corp. v. State Tax Commission

231 Or. 570 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1962

Davenport National Bank v. Board of Equalization, 123 U S 83, 8 S Ct 73 , 31 L Ed 94 (1887); Amoskeag Sav. Bank v. Purdy, 231 U S 373, 58 L Ed 274 , 34 S Ct 114 (1913); Annotation, 59 ALR 10 , 16. … Ankeny v. Blakeley, 44 Or 78 , 74 P 485 (1903); Citizen’s Nat. Bank v. Board of Equalization, 109 Or 669 , 222 P 341 (1924).

Calvert v. Idaho Stage Co.

25 Or. 412 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1894

Salisbury and the plaintiff, but, on objection thereto, it was excluded because no formal resolution of the board of directors was shown authorizing Salisbury to make such a contract on behalf of the company. … As a general rule this ’is true, but it may become a coowner with an individual in a business or enterprise within the scope of its corporate powers: Hackett v. Multnomah Ry. Co. 12 Or. 124 , 53 Am. Rep. 327 .

Nutbrown v. Munn

311 Or. 328 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1991

See Sanok v. … See Sanok v.

Pribble v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

249 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1968

The tile was “multiple color, dark brown and tan.” Plaintiff was wearing rubber soles and low heels. The entrance door was glass. Before she fell she did not see the condition of the floor. … Klein v.

Bauman v. Clark

203 Or. 193 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1955

Clark, the plaintiff, brought suit for divorce, and the defendant Lydia V. Clark, by way of cross-complaint, sought a decree of separation from bed and board. … In Mignot v. Mignot we said: “* * * Under the rule of Adamson v.

Cook v. Leona Mills Lumber Co.

106 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1923

BROWN, J. 1. The disposition of this case depends upon the averments of the complaint and the meaning of our statute. … In Biehn v.

Benton County v. Allen

170 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1943

J. 462 and cited with approval in Corporation of Sisters of Mercy v. … Porter, president of the board of trustees and one of the members of the board, who borrowed *496 $800 at the bank on his personal note “to keep the thing going” testified: “It has been the instruction of the Board of Trustees

Leary v. Pacific Northwest Bell

296 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

The Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and allowed an award of benefits. We allowed review in this case and McGarrah v. … The Court of Appeals based its conclusion that the work-related stress was the major contributing cause of the claimant’s disability on the subjective test we rejected in McGarrah v. SAIF, supra.

Garnsey v. County Court

33 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1898

Dayton v. Board of Equalization, 33 Or. 131 ( 50 Pac. 1009, 1012 ) ; Cal. & Oregon Land Co. v. Gowen, 48 Fed. 771 . … Pl. & Prac. 90, 98, 256; Ennis v. Ennis, 110 Ill. 78 ; Hamilton v. Harwood, 118 Ill. 154 ; People v. Dwinelle, 29 Cal. 632 ; Central Pac. R. Co. v. Board of Equalization, 46 Cal. 667 ; Alexander v.

Neal v. Haight

187 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1949

Weinstein v. Wheeler, 135 Or. 518 , 295 P. 196 , 296 P. 1079 ; Frederick & Nelson v, Bard, 74 Or. 457 , 145 P. 669 . In Timmins v. … “Q Did you have a running board? “A Yes, sir. “Q Did you see him step on the running board? “A I didn’t pay a bit of attention. He evidently must have stepped on it. “Q What are the physical facts about it?

Jones v. Adams

37 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1900

In Carr v. Thompson, 67 Mo. 472 , it was held that the word “due” was improperly used for “owing.” As illustrating this definition, see, also, Leggett v. Bank, 25 Barb. 326 ; Allen v. Patterson, 7 N. Y. 476 ( 57 Am. … Seabrook, 39 Ga. 14 ; Lamberton v. Stouffer, 55 Pa. St. 284; Long v. Seavers, 103 Pa. St. 517; Brown v. Adams, 35 Tex. 447 .

Lentz v. Oregon Growers Co-Operative Ass'n

116 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1925

Baker, 43 Or. 236, 241 ( 72 Pac. 744 ); Triphonoff v. Sweeney, 65 Or. 299 ( 130 Pac. 979 ); Blaser v. Fleck, 96 Or. 187 ( 189 Pac. 637 ); Simon v. Trummer, 57 Or. 153 ( 110 Pac. 786 ); Devlin v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Williams v. Dale

139 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1932

National Hospital Association , supra; Stires v. Sherwood , 75 Or. 108 ( 145 P. 645 ); Berkley v. Wilson , 87 Md. 219 ( 39 A. 502 ); Martin v. Cunningham , 93 Wn. 517 ( 161 P. 355 , L.R.A. 1918A, 225 ); Retelle v. … Justice RAND in McDonough v. National Hosital Ass'n , supra, we deem an extended discussion unnecessary. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. BROWN and BELT, JJ., concur. ROSSMAN, J., dissents.

Sadler v. Oregon State Bar

275 Or. 279 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1976

U’Ren v. … U’Ren v. Bagley, supra, 118 Or at 83 . In Nendel v.

State v. McMaster

259 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1971

State Board of Education, 1 Cal3d 214, 82 Cal Rptr 175, 461 P2d 375, 387 (1969). … In State v.