Case law

State v. Ogden

39 Or. 195 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1901

Alice Brown, the contusion on her shoulder and the abrasioxx on her knee. The district attorney, referring to Mrs. Brown, asked the following question: “Do you know her condition physically?” … State, 8 Ohio St. 643 ; Pefferling v. State, 40 Tex. 486 ; Dorsey v. State, 1 Tex. App. 33 ; Rogers v. State, 1 Tex. App. 187 ; Jenkins v. State, 1 Tex. App. 346 ; Mayo v. State, 7 Tex. App. 342; Lawson v.

Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.

196 Or. 608 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1952

Cottrell v. Prier, 191 Or 571, 575 , 231 P2d 788 ; Barnes v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 112 Or 41, 43 , 228 P 684 ; Graves v. … State v. Wells, Fargo & Co., 64 Or 421, 425 , 126 P 611 , 130 P 983 ; Inverarity v. Stowell, 10 Or 261, 265 . And see Bush v. Mitchell, supra.

Herbert v. Dufur

23 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1893

In Swift v. … Y. 338 ; Carl v. Ayres, 53 N. Y. 14 ; Bickell v. Taylor, 55 How. Pr. 126 . But, as the court said in Mateer v.

Philbrick v. O'Connor

15 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1886

On the subject of notice in such case this court said, in Coolidge v. … John O’Connor, with whom appellant boarded, and with him; that the appellant paid eighteen hundred dollars for the property, which was worth nearly three times that sum; that the appellant was virtually without money or any

Carmichael v. Carmichael

101 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1921

BROWN, J. … . *176 818); Hanthorn v. Oliver, 32 Or. 57, 62 ( 51 Pac. 440 , 67 Am. St. Rep. 518 ); Coos Bay Nav. Co. v. Endicott, 34 Or. 573 ( 57 Pac. 61 ); Nye v. Bill Nye Milling Co., 46 Or. 302, 305 ( 80 Pac. 94 ); McCoy v.

Hughes v. Lansing

34 Or. 118 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1898

The right to assert and perfect the lien given by statute is a privilege (Brown v. Harper, 4 Or. 89 ) which he may exercise or not, at his pleasure. 2. The statute (Hill’s Ann. … The identical question has been so decided in Burns v. Carlson, 53 Minn. 70 ( 54 N. W. 1055 ). 6. Mr.

Morgan's Estate

46 Or. 233 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1904

Pl. & Pr. 10; Hopwood v. Patterson, 2 Or. 49 ; Derkeny v. Belfils, 4 Or. 258 ; Chamberlain v. Hibbard, 26 Or. 428 ( 38 Pac. 437 ). 8. … Co. 21 Or. 281 ( 28 Pac. 5 ); Herbert v. Dufur, 23 Or. 462 ( 32 Pac. 302 ); Brown v. Oregon Lumber Co. 24 Or. 315 ( 33 Pac. 557 ); Barr v. Rader, 33 Or. 375 ( 54 Pac. 210 ); Feldman v.

Leary v. Pacific Northwest Bell

296 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1983

The Court of Appeals reversed the Workers’ Compensation Board and allowed an award of benefits. We allowed review in this case and McGarrah v. … The Court of Appeals based its conclusion that the work-related stress was the major contributing cause of the claimant’s disability on the subjective test we rejected in McGarrah v. SAIF, supra.

Christenson v. Behrens

231 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1962

or mop board. … See Stark-Davis Co. v. Wilson, 119 Or 308 , 248 P 1095 ; Fox & Co. v. Roman Catholic Bishop, 107 Or 557 , 215 P 178 ; Sarchet v. Legg, 60 Or 213 , 118 P 203 ; and Crane Co. v. Ellis, 58 Or 299 , 114 P 475 .

Cook v. Leona Mills Lumber Co.

106 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1923

BROWN, J. 1. The disposition of this case depends upon the averments of the complaint and the meaning of our statute. … In Biehn v.

Baker v. Multnomah County

118 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1926

In Sweeney v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Garnsey v. County Court

33 Or. 201 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1898

Dayton v. Board of Equalization, 33 Or. 131 ( 50 Pac. 1009, 1012 ) ; Cal. & Oregon Land Co. v. Gowen, 48 Fed. 771 . … Pl. & Prac. 90, 98, 256; Ennis v. Ennis, 110 Ill. 78 ; Hamilton v. Harwood, 118 Ill. 154 ; People v. Dwinelle, 29 Cal. 632 ; Central Pac. R. Co. v. Board of Equalization, 46 Cal. 667 ; Alexander v.

Sloan Ex Rel. City of Portland v. Baker

139 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1932

Defendant construes the term 1 ‘ absence from the city” as meaning absence from duty; and, as illustrative of the distinction between absence from duty and absence on duty, cites the case of United States v. … Campbell, Brown and Band, JJ., concur. Bean, C. J., Belt and Bossman, JJ., did not participate in this decision.

Neal v. Haight

187 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1949

Weinstein v. Wheeler, 135 Or. 518 , 295 P. 196 , 296 P. 1079 ; Frederick & Nelson v, Bard, 74 Or. 457 , 145 P. 669 . In Timmins v. … “Q Did you have a running board? “A Yes, sir. “Q Did you see him step on the running board? “A I didn’t pay a bit of attention. He evidently must have stepped on it. “Q What are the physical facts about it?

Williams v. Dale

139 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1932

National Hospital Association , supra; Stires v. Sherwood , 75 Or. 108 ( 145 P. 645 ); Berkley v. Wilson , 87 Md. 219 ( 39 A. 502 ); Martin v. Cunningham , 93 Wn. 517 ( 161 P. 355 , L.R.A. 1918A, 225 ); Retelle v. … Justice RAND in McDonough v. National Hosital Ass'n , supra, we deem an extended discussion unnecessary. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. BROWN and BELT, JJ., concur. ROSSMAN, J., dissents.

State of Oregon v. Watts

208 Or. 407 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1956

In State v. … In State v.

Phillips v. Creighton

211 Or. 645 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1957

See: Watt v. Associated Oil Co., 123 Or. 50 , 260 P. 1012 ; Bernasconi v. Bassi, 261 Mass. 26, 28 , 158 N. E. 341 ; Grogan v. Dooley, 211 N. Y. 30 , 105 N. E. 135 ; Sias v. … We have reviewed the authorities eited in plaintiff’s brief which include Brown v. Wood, 201 NC 309, 160 SE 281 , and insofar as they are in conflict with the rule adopted by this court, we decline to follow them.

In Re Water Rights of Deschutes River

134 Or. 623 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1929

In Hough v. … Justice Burnett in Caviness v.

Lentz v. Oregon Growers Co-Operative Ass'n

116 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 8, 1925

Baker, 43 Or. 236, 241 ( 72 Pac. 744 ); Triphonoff v. Sweeney, 65 Or. 299 ( 130 Pac. 979 ); Blaser v. Fleck, 96 Or. 187 ( 189 Pac. 637 ); Simon v. Trummer, 57 Or. 153 ( 110 Pac. 786 ); Devlin v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. McMaster

259 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1971

State Board of Education, 1 Cal3d 214, 82 Cal Rptr 175, 461 P2d 375, 387 (1969). … In State v.