Case law

Kalich v. Knapp

73 Or. 558 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1914

or boards, other than the council. … While there may be certain statements contained in Straw v.

State v. Willson

113 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1925

Robinson , 146 Mass. 571 ( 16 N.E. 452 ); People v. Foley , 64 Mich. 148 ( 31 N.W. 94 ); State v. Williamson , 106 Mo. 162 ( 17 S.W. 172 ); State v. Perry , 136 Mo. 126 ( 37 S.W. 804 ); Brown v. Commonwealth , 76 Pa. … State , 135 Ind. 38 ( 34 N.E. 817 ); Commonwealth v. Choate , 105 Mass. 451 ; Brown v.

Davis v. Sladden

17 Or. 259 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1889

(Fowler v. Chichester, 26 Ohio St. 9 ; Kennedy v. McLaughlin, 5 Gray, 3 ; Stevens v. Hartwell, 11 Met. 542 ; Inmann v. Foster, 8 Wend. 602 ; Treat v. Browning, 4 Conn. 408 ; Sans v. Joerries, 14 Wis. 722 ; State v. … Ann. 166 ; Evans v. Smith, 5 T. B. Mon. 364; Fitzgerald v. Stewart, 53 Pa. St. 343; Wolcott v. Hall, 6 Mass. 513 ; Alderman v. French, 1 Pick. 1 ; Bodwell v. Swan, 3 Pick. 376 ; Watson v. Buck, 5 Cow. 499 ; Root v.

City of Newberg v. Warren Construction Co.

130 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1929

We see no need to reiterate the distinction between this case and Dennis v. City of McMinnville, 128 Or. 101 ( 269 Pac. 221 ). Petition for rehearing is denied. Rehearing Denied. Coshow, C. J., and Bean, J., concur. … Brown, J., absent.

O'Sullivan v. Blakely

54 Or. 551 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1909

Casto v. Murray, 47 Or. 57, 63 ( 81 Pac. 388, 883 ) ; Freeman v. Trummer, 50 Or. 287, 292 ( 91 Pac. 1077 ). … assessor, unless such fact is to be inferred from the averment “that on said tax roll [referring to a transcript of the original assessment roll] the plaintiff’s personal property assessment, as equalized by the county board

Lenrich Associates v. Heyda

264 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1972

Those courts relied on the reasoning of the Supreme Court in Marsh v. Alabama, 326 US 501 , 66 S Ct 276 , 90 L Ed 265 (1946) and Amalgamated Food Employees Union Local 590 v. … That power was recently exercised in Steven *127 son v. Holzman, 254 Or 94, 103-104 , 458 P2d 414, 419 (1969) and in State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). In State v.

Jewell v. Triple B. Enterprises, Inc.

290 Or. 885 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 28, 1981

McMillan v. Golden, 262 Or 317, 320 , 497 P2d 1166 (1972). … North Pacific Lumber Co. v. Oliver, 286 Or 639, 665 , 596 P2d 931 (1979).

Minielly v. State

242 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966

In Garner v. … In Adler v. Board of Education, 342 US 485 , 72 S Ct 380 , 96 L Ed. 517 (1952), the court upheld the New York Feinberg Law which established elaborate procedures for investigating the fitness of public employees.

Hoffman v. Broadway Hazelwood

139 Or. 519 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1932

On page 41 of appellant’s brief, it is stated: “Assignment of Error III, IV, V and VI submitted to tbe jury tbe question of the applicability of the Employers’ Liability Act. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Clemmensen v. Peterson

35 Or. 47 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1899

The first decision upon the subject was in Ryan v. … This *51 case was specially approved and followed in Multnomah County v. Adams, 6 Or. 114 . See, also, Craig v. Mosier, 2 Or. 323 ; State v. Wiley, 4 Or. 184 ; Portland v. Denny, 5 Or. 160 .

State v. Purvis

249 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1968

See United States v. Minker, 312 F2d 632 (3d Cir 1962). … Compare Work v. United States, 243 F2d 660 (D.C. Cir 1957).

Kenner v. Schmidt

252 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1968

Because there was no bunkhouse or other convenient quarters Leedom lived in the ranch house with defendant and his family and was charged board and room, which was deducted from his pay. In Mutzig v. … In Lane v.

Alaska Plumbing Co. v. Bingham

58 Or. 506 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1911

He had no interest in a single foot of the soil or a single board in the building, but a right to demand a conveyance of these upon compliance with his contract. … In Kerrick v. Ruggles, 78 Wis. 274 ( 47 N.

Mosley v. Portland School District No. 1J

315 Or. 85 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1992

In Dizick v. … Stevenson v.

Jones v. Adams

37 Or. 473 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1900

In Carr v. Thompson, 67 Mo. 472 , it was held that the word “due” was improperly used for “owing.” As illustrating this definition, see, also, Leggett v. Bank, 25 Barb. 326 ; Allen v. Patterson, 7 N. Y. 476 ( 57 Am. … Seabrook, 39 Ga. 14 ; Lamberton v. Stouffer, 55 Pa. St. 284; Long v. Seavers, 103 Pa. St. 517; Brown v. Adams, 35 Tex. 447 .

Pribble v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

249 Or. 184 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1968

The tile was “multiple color, dark brown and tan.” Plaintiff was wearing rubber soles and low heels. The entrance door was glass. Before she fell she did not see the condition of the floor. … Klein v.

Adams v. Church

59 L.R.A. 782 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1902

Rep. 794 ); Miller v. Little, 47 Cal. 348 ; Russell v. Lowth, 21 Minn. 167 ( 18 Am. Rep. 389 ); Baldwin v. Boyd, 18 Neb. 444 ( 25 N. W. 580 ); Brandhofer v. Bain, 45 Neb. 781 ( 64 N. W. 213 ); Van Doren v. Miller, 14 S. … Rep. 232 ); Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 ( 93 Am. Dec. 578 ); Evans v. Bryan, 95 N. C. 174 ( 59 Am. Rep. 233 ); Ferguson v. Speith, 13 Mont. 487 ( 34 Pac. 1020 , 40 Am. St. Rep. 459 ); Moyer v. Drummond, 32 S.

Campbell v. Southern Pacific Co.

120 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1926

Co. v. Harris, 246 U. S. 367 ( 62 L. Ed. 1167 , 38 Sup. Ct. *125 Rep. 535, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes Supp.); Looney v. Metropolitan R. R. Co., 200 U. S. 480, 486 ( 50 L. Ed. 564 , 26 Sup. Ct. Rep. 303); Finn v. … Co. v. Murray, 85 Ark. 600 ( 109 S. W. 549 , 16 L. R. A. (N.

Sargent v. Oregon Savings & Loan Co.

73 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 10, 1914

“In witness whereof, the Oregon Savings & Loan Company has caused this bond to be executed by its president and secretary, under express authority of its board of directors, and its corporate seal affixed this - day of -, … State, 10 Wyo. 10 ( 65 Pac. 849 , 69 Pac. 2 ); People v. Smith, 112 Mich. 192 ( 70 N. W. 466 , 67 Am. St. Rep. 392 ); State v. Nevins, 23 Vt. 519 ; 29 Cyc. 1509.

Fisher v. Kirk & Son, Inc.

219 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1959

Turnidge v. Thompson, 89 Or 637 , 175 P 281 ; Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co., 99 Or 58 , 190 P 331 , 195 P 163 ; Drefs v. Holman Transfer Co., 130 Or 452 , 280 P 505 ; Myers v. Staub, 201 Or 663 , 272 P2d 203 .” … Byers et al. v. Hardy et al., supra; Warner v. Synnes et al., 114 Or 451, 462 ; 230 P 362 , 235 P 305 ; McCauley v. Steamship “Willamette” et al., 109 Or 131, 145 , 215 P 892 ; Tamm v.