Case law

Cooper v. Sagert

111 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924

They are regarded as merely cumulative: Cox v. Smith, 10 Or. 418 ; 2 Freeman on Judgments (4 ed.), § 467. In Cox v. … J., and Brown and McCoitrt, JJ., concur.

Monnet v. Ullman

129 Or. 44 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1929

Peters v. Johnson, 124 Or. 237 ( 264 Pac. 450 ), is a case similar to Book v. Schultz, supra. … H. 335 ( 109 Atl. 45 ); Driscoll v. Scanlon, 165 Mass. 348 ( 43 N. E. 100 , 52 Am. St. Rep. 523 ); Barker v. Dairymen’s Milk P. Co., 205 Ala. 470 (88 South. 588); Zampella v. Fitzhenry, 97 N. J.

Rushing v. Saboe

130 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1929

Case v. McKinnis, 107 Or. 223, 236 ( 213 Pac. 422 , 32 A. L. R. 167); Frazey v. Casey, 96 Wash. 422 ( 165 Pac. 104 ); Security State Bank v. Adkins, 134 Wash. 94 ( 235 Pac. 18 ). … Brown, J., absent.

Parker v. Jeffery

26 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1894

Y. 219 ; Second National Bank v. Grand Lodge, 98 U. S. 123 ; Shamp v. Meyer, 20 Neb. 223 , 29 N. W. 379 , 24 Cent. Law Jour. 111, and note; Austin v. Seligman, 18 Fed. 519 ; Wright v. … All the liability incurred by either was upon the bond, and this was to the obligee only. ” And in Simson v. Brown, 68 N.

Stryker v. Hastie

131 Or. 282 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1929

To apply the doctrine announced in Ramp v. … Belt and Brown, JJ., absent.

Cope v. West American Insurance

309 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1990

However, no one suggested to the trial court in this case that the matter should be referred to the Workers’ Compensation Board. … See, e.g., Ehredt v. DeHavilland Aircraft Co. of Canada, 705 P2d 446 (Alas 1985); Yavitch v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., 142 Cal App 3d 64, 190 Cal Rptr 793 (1983); Ward v.

In Re Idleman's Commitment

146 Or. 13 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1933

In State v. … Withycombe, 81 Or. 210 ( 159 P. 78 ); Warren v.

State v. Langley

314 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1992

As State v. … State v.

Wagner V. Wallowa County

76 Or. 453 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1915

Such precedents are these: Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Buck, 79 N. J. … Indeed, the text-writers are in unison on this point: Berenbroick v. St. Luke’s Hospital, 23 App. Div. 339 ( 48 *468 N. Y. Supp. 363 ); Board of Education v. Baker, 124 Tenn. 39 ( 134 S. W. 863 ); Hooper v.

Weatherly v. Hochfeld

133 Or. 136 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1930

As stated in Mahon v. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Pio v. Kelly

275 Or. 585 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1976

strike or picketing would have been unlawful as an unfair labor practice in this case, defendants’ exclusive remedy in such an event was by the filing of an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board … Wagner et al, 216 Or 386, 390 , 337 P2d 326 (1959); Brown v.

Shirley v. Freunscht

303 Or. 234 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1987

McCormick, Evidence section 187 (2d ed 1972); Guedon v. Rooney, 160 Or [621,] 87 P2d 209 (1939). … See, e.g., Lowe v. Brown, 114 Or 426, 433-34 , 233 P 272 , 235 P 395 (1925); State v. Mason, 26 Or *239 273, 277-78, 38 P 130 (1894); see also Prosser & Keeton, The Law of Torts 771, § 111 (5th ed 1984).

Walton Et Ux v. Denhart Et Ux

226 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1961

Passow & Sons v. Harris, 29 Cal App 559, 156 P 997 ; United States F. & G. Co. v. Robert Grace C. Co., 263 F 283; Brown & Bigelow v. Bard, 118 NYS 371 , 64 M 249; Fenner, Beane & Ungerleider v. … Vaughan et ux. v. Wilson et al., 203 Or 243 , 273 P2d 991 , 279 P2d 521 ; Krebs Hop Co. v. Livesley, 51 Or 527 , 92 P 1084 ; Lewis v. New York Life Ins. Co., 181 F 433; American Surety Co. v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Eads

303 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1987

, and the board of governors as requested, subject only to the exercise of any applicable right or privilege.” … Tarpley, 122 Or 479 , 259 P 783 (1927); State ex rel McCourt v. Garland, 11 Or 92, 150 P 289 (1915); State ex rel McCourt v. Smith, 73 Or 96 , 144 P 424 (1914); Ex parte Kindt, 32 Or 474 , 52 P 187 (1898).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Brown

255 Or. 628 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1970

The Board of Governors, however, could not agree upon an unanimous recommendation, with one member voting for permanent disbarment, four voting for a suspension of one year and six voting for a public reprimand. … See Heise v. Pilot Book Lumber Co., 222 Or 78, 90 , 352 P2d 1072 (1960) and numerous cases and authorities cited therein.

Yamhill Electric Co. v. City of McMinnville

130 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1928

In Churchill v. … “System” has a like connotation: Brown v. Gerald, 100 Me. 351, 354 ( 61 Atl. 785 , 109 Am. St. Rep. 526 , 70 L. R. A. 472); Cleveland, etc., v. Scott, 29 Ind. App. 519, 530 ( 64 N. E. 896 ); Roebling & Sons v.

SCHMIDT v. City of Cornelius

211 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1957

In Foeller v. … Jackson v.

Salo v. Northern Savings & Loan Ass'n

140 Or. 351 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1932

The sale of stock under such circumstances would be fraudulent and illegal: Pennicard v. Coe, 124 Or. 423 ( 263 Pac. 920 ); Moe v. Coe, 124 Or. 436 ( 263 Pac. 925 ). … J., Brown and Bossman, JJ., concur.

Nibler v. Oregon Department of Transportation

338 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 2005

In Ben Rybke Co. v. … See Newport Church of the Nazarene v.

Brooks v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

58 Or. 387 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1911

Co. v. Vancil, 2 Tex. Civ. App. 427 ( 21 S. W. 303 ); Texas R. Co. v. Douglas, [Tex. Civ. App.] ( 30 S. W. 487 ). … The complaint alleges as special damages the expenses incurred by plaintiff on account of board and lodging for three days.