Case law

Bailey v. Hickey

99 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1921

BROWN, J. 1, 2. The defendants insist that their demurrer should have been sustained, first, on the *255 ground that “several causes of action have been improperly united.” This contention is without merit. … In Cox v.

Willamette Box & Lumber Co. v. Wheeler

102 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1921

In Miller v. Miller, 47 Minn. 546 ( 50 N. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur.

Smith v. Day

39 Or. 531 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1901

E. 431 ); Zaegel v. Kuster, 51 Wis. 31 ( 7 N. W. 781 ); Smith v. City of Janesville, 52 Wis. 680 ( 9 N. W. 789 ) ; Benedix v. German Ins. Co. 78 Wis. 77 ( 47 N. W. 176 ). … Sears, 13 Or. 47 ( 11 Pac. 891 ); Cooper v. Blair, 14 Or. 255 ( 12 Pac. 370 ); Bard v. Yohn, 26 Pa. St. 482 ; Klauder v. McGrath, 35 Pal St. 128 ( 72 Am. Dec. 329 ); Little S. Nav. Co. v. Richard’s Admrs, 57 Pa.

Billion v. Billion

124 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1928

Divorces are granted in this state solely upon statutory grounds: Wheeler v. Wheeler, 18 Or. 261 ( 24 Pac. 900 ); Jones v. Jones, 59 Or. 308 ( 117 Pac. 414 ); Leefield v. Leefield, 85 Or. 287 ( 166 Pac. 953 ); Cain v. … J., and McBride and Brown, J.J., concur.

In re Conry

368 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2021

.)); Cole v. … .]”); Little v.

United States National Bank v. State Tax Commission

233 Or. 478 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1963

The particular circumstances created by a decision of the Supreme Court,—Eisner v. … NYU Institute of Federal Taxation, 1946, 565 at page 570; Darrell, Corporate Liquidation and the Federal Income Tax, 1941, 89 Pa L Rev 907, 914; Rheinstrom v. Conner, 1942 6th Cir, 125 F2d 790; Earle v.

State v. Simpson

69 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1914

The canvassing board declared defendant elected to the office of captain of the Oregon Naval Militia, whereupon relator, conformable to the provisions of Section 368 et seq., L. O. … Corp. v. Portland Hospital, 40 Or. 524 ( 64 Pac. 644 , 67 Pac. 194 , 56 L. R. A. 627). 2.

Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego

365 Or. 691 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 2019

CITY OF LAKE OSWEGO; and the State of Oregon, by and through the State Land Board and the Department of State Lands, Respondents on Review, … Also on the petition for reconsideration was Paul Conable. 692 Kramer v. City of Lake Oswego Thane W.

Enright v. Meves

142 Or. 88 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1932

As was said in Bayne v. … Houck, 133 Or. 78 ( 283 P. 25 , 288 P. 213 ); Harris v. Southeast Portland Lumber Company, 123 Or. 549 ( 262 P. 243 ), and cases there cited. As said in McNear v.

Philomath College v. Wyatt

27 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1893

In Collier v. … The case from Mississippi (Hawkins v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Miss. 735 ) has been *485 reviewed by the United States supreme court — Carroll County v. Smith, 111 U. S. 556 , (4 Sup.

City of Newberg v. Warren Construction Co.

130 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1929

We see no need to reiterate the distinction between this case and Dennis v. City of McMinnville, 128 Or. 101 ( 269 Pac. 221 ). Petition for rehearing is denied. Rehearing Denied. Coshow, C. J., and Bean, J., concur. … Brown, J., absent.

State v. Willson

113 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1925

Robinson , 146 Mass. 571 ( 16 N.E. 452 ); People v. Foley , 64 Mich. 148 ( 31 N.W. 94 ); State v. Williamson , 106 Mo. 162 ( 17 S.W. 172 ); State v. Perry , 136 Mo. 126 ( 37 S.W. 804 ); Brown v. Commonwealth , 76 Pa. … State , 135 Ind. 38 ( 34 N.E. 817 ); Commonwealth v. Choate , 105 Mass. 451 ; Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Coast Holding Co. v. Ekwall

144 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1933

In McElvain v. … In State ex rel. v.

H. S. & D. Investment Co. v. McCool

139 Or. 266 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 15, 1932

Also see Cooper v. Aiello, 93 N. J. Law 336 ( 107 Atl. 473 ); Imperial Water Co. v. Cameron, 67 Cal. App. 591 ( 228 P. 678 ); Post v. Davis, 7 Kan. App. 217 (52 *272 P. 903); and 35 C. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

City of Marshfield Ex Rel. McGeorge Gravel Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

128 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1929

L. 111; Page on the Law of Contracts, §2845; Columbia Digger Co. v. Rector, 215 Fed. 618 . … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Port of Umatilla v. RICHMOND

212 Or. 596 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1958

“NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED by this Board of Commissioners, all members thereof being present and voting affirmatively, as follows: “1. … See, State v. Hawk; Bridal Veil Lumbering Co. v. Johnson, Coos Bay Logging Co. v. Barclay; Apex Transfer Co. v. Garbade; Sears v. City of Akron; all supra; and, City of Waukegan v.

Dayton v. Fenno

99 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1921

BROWN, J. The record shows that the plaintiff, F. E. … In Benson v.

Holst v. State Industrial Accident Commission

117 Or. 370 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1926

We decided in the Maroulas case that after an appeal had been taken from the final decision of the State Industrial Accident Commission, it was competent to submit the controversy to a board of arbitration by agreement with … In Dodd v. American Surety Co., 60 Or. 56 ( 118 Pac. 198 ,) this court speaking through Mr.

Cooper v. Sagert

111 Or. 27 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1924

They are regarded as merely cumulative: Cox v. Smith, 10 Or. 418 ; 2 Freeman on Judgments (4 ed.), § 467. In Cox v. … J., and Brown and McCoitrt, JJ., concur.

Adams v. Church

59 L.R.A. 782 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1902

Rep. 794 ); Miller v. Little, 47 Cal. 348 ; Russell v. Lowth, 21 Minn. 167 ( 18 Am. Rep. 389 ); Baldwin v. Boyd, 18 Neb. 444 ( 25 N. W. 580 ); Brandhofer v. Bain, 45 Neb. 781 ( 64 N. W. 213 ); Van Doren v. Miller, 14 S. … Rep. 232 ); Stewart v. Brown, 37 N. Y. 350 ( 93 Am. Dec. 578 ); Evans v. Bryan, 95 N. C. 174 ( 59 Am. Rep. 233 ); Ferguson v. Speith, 13 Mont. 487 ( 34 Pac. 1020 , 40 Am. St. Rep. 459 ); Moyer v. Drummond, 32 S.