Case law

May v. MACK

225 Or. 278 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1960

The ruling in Ramp et al. v. … Whisnant v. Holland, 206 Or 392 , 292 P2d 1087 ; Sylvis v. Hays, 138 Or 418 , 6 P2d 1098 ; Brown v. Jones, 137 Or 520 , 3 P2d 768 ; Multnomah Co. v. Willamette T. Co., 49 Or 204 , 89 P 389 . The case of Whisnant v.

Johnson v. Prineville

100 Or. 105 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1921

Justice Bean in *116 Sweeney v. Jackson County, 93 Or. 96 ( 178 Pac. 365 , 182 Pac. 380 ). It is also taught in Oregon-Wash. R. & N. Co. v. Spokane, Portland & Seattle Ry. … Bean, Benson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Lemon v. Madden

216 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1959

Denham v. Cuddeback, 210 Or 485, 489 , 311 P2d 1014 ; Holladay-Klots Land Co. v. T. J. Moss Tie Co., 79 Mo App 543; 52 Am Jur 856, Trespass § 27. … Brown, Personal Property (2d ed), 19ff; ORS 41.360(12). This is an action for trespass to real property. The allegations as to the fence can he taken as identifying the damage inflicted by the trespass.

Bailey v. Hickey

99 Or. 251 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1921

BROWN, J. 1, 2. The defendants insist that their demurrer should have been sustained, first, on the *255 ground that “several causes of action have been improperly united.” This contention is without merit. … In Cox v.

Amort v. Tupper

204 Or. 279 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1955

Y. 300 ; Parmlee v. Adolph, 28 Ohio St. 10 ; Williamson v. New Jersey 8. R. R. Co., 29 N. J. Eq. 311; Wicks v. Smith, 21 Kan. 412 ( 30 Am. Rep. 433 ); Marston v. Simpson, 54 Cal. 189 .” Scott v. … Johnson et ux. v. Cofer, 204 Or 142 , 281 P2d 981 ; Schuler et ux. v. Humphrey et ux., 198 Or 458 , 257 P2d 865 ; Miller et ux. v. Protrka et ux., 193 Or 585 , 238 P2d 753 ; Weiss and Hamilton v.

Nehalem Packing Co. v. Tillamook County

55 Or. 226 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1909

This is a proceeding to review the action of the Tillamook County board of equalization in refusing to reduce the valuation of certain canning machinery assessed to plaintiff, and to cancel the assessment to plaintiff of … The questions involved here are identical with those in case of the Elmore Packing Co. v.

Oregon Real Est. Co. v. Multnomah County

35 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1899

Upon the authority of Dayton v. … Board of Equalization, 33 Or. 131 ( 50 Pac. 1009 , and 55 Pac. 23 ), the court below denied the relief first prayed for, but entered a decree perpetually enjoining the collection of the additional two per cent.

Philomath College v. Wyatt

27 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1893

In Collier v. … The case from Mississippi (Hawkins v. Board of Supervisors, 50 Miss. 735 ) has been *485 reviewed by the United States supreme court — Carroll County v. Smith, 111 U. S. 556 , (4 Sup.

In re Conry

368 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2021

.)); Cole v. … .]”); Little v.

McGirl v. Brewer

132 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1929

*425 BROWN, J. The Montana statute provides that, in a suit to foreclose a mortgage, it is lawful to obtain a personal judgment for any deficiency remaining after foreclosure. … The case of Farley v.

Herrick v. Wallace

114 Or. 520 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1925

BROWN, J. — The question here involved relates to the validity of the proceedings had by motion to satisfy plaintiff’s judgment. … Walker, 1 Or. 341 ; Harker v. Fahie, 2 Or. 89 ; White v. Northwest Stage Co., 5 Or. 99 ; Belknap v. Charlton, 25 Or. 41 (34 Pac. 758); Mayer v. Mayer, 27 Or. 133 ( 39 Pac. 1002 ); *529 Waymire v.

Savage v. Munn

317 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1993

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citing Oregon Cty. Mfgs. Ass’n v. White, 159 Or 99, 109 , 78 P2d 572 (1938)). … Bowers, supra note 4, 358 US at 529 (holding that state legislatures need not state an explicit purpose due to presumption that purposes of tax assessment are valid); Brown-Foreman Co. v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Rochat

295 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1983

From the record made before the Trial Board, we find the following to be the facts. The accused was admitted to practice in Oregon in 1973. He is also admitted to practice in Florida. … The accused advanced the proposition that a violation of DR 1-102(A) (5) is neither more nor less than a charge of “unethical” or *537 “unprofessional” conduct, citing Board of Medical Examiners v.

Ginter v. Handy

244 Or. 449 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1966

. • ■ The law is as we stated it to be in Britton v. Jackson, 226 Or 136 , 359 P2d 429 (1961); and Phillips, Gdn. v. Creighton, Adm., 211 Or 645, 652 , 316 P2d 302 (1957). … Through December, 1964, we paid out $14,008 for labor and room and board.” The above testimony is evidence to support plaintiff’s claim and requires submission of the issue to the *454 jury. Fields v.

Holder v. Petty

267 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1973

In Conachan v. Williams, supra, although involving different facts, we said (at 517): “In Brown v. O.-W.R. & N. … Williams, 266 Or 45 , 511 P2d 392 (1973): “This includes Martin v. Hahn, 252 Or 585, 589 , 451 P2d 465 (1969); Fields v. Fields, 213 Or 522, 537 , 307 P2d 528 , 326 P2d 451 (1958); Shaw v.

Kelly v. Galloway

156 Or. 301 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1936

But, as was said in Vawter v. Rogue River Valley Can. Co., 124 Or. 94 , ( 257 P. 23 , 262 P. 851 ), “as a general rule, a corporation can act only through its board of directors at a regularly called meeting. … In Lynch v. Turrish, supra, and Tootle v.

Barnes v. Esch

87 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1917

Brown, 37 Or. 185 ( 61 Pac. 428 ). A suit in equity *6 will lie to restrain, waste: Sheridan v. McMullen, 12 Or. 150 ( 6 Pac. 497 ); Elliott v. Bloyd, 40 Or. 326 ( 67 Pac. 202); Roots v. … Trust Co. v. Leck, 57 Minn. 87 . ( 58 N. W. 826 , 47 Am. St. Rep. 576 ). In Mitchell v.

Whitney v. Whitney

114 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1925

BROWN, J. The pleading in the case at bar was challenged by demurrer. … To the same effect, see Wells v. Applegate, 12 Or. 208 ( 6 Pac. 770 ); Drake v. Sworts, 24 Or. 198 ( 33 Pac. 563 ); Savage v. Savage, 36 Or. 268 ( 59 Pac. 461 ); Byers v.

Douglas County Road Co. v. Abraham

5 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

(Washburn on Easements and Servitudes, ch. 1, § 5, and cases there cited; Oustott v. Murray, 22 Iowa, 457 ; Ewell v. Greenwood, 26 Id. 377; Daniels V. The People, 21 Ill. 442 ; Lewiston v. Proctor, 27 Ill. 417 .) … The County Court or Board of County Commissioners can speak only through the journal. ( 8 Ind. 504 ; 6 Cal. 541 ; 7 Ind. 6 .)

City of Marshfield Ex Rel. McGeorge Gravel Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

128 Or. 547 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1929

L. 111; Page on the Law of Contracts, §2845; Columbia Digger Co. v. Rector, 215 Fed. 618 . … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.