Case law

State Highway Commission v. Assembly of God, Pentecostal

230 Or. 167 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1962

Highway Commission v. … Jay Six Cattle Co., 88 Ariz 97, 353 P2d 185 (1960); Iowa Development Co. v. Iowa State Highway Comm’n., 108 NW 2d 487 (Iowa 1961); Board of Park Commissioners v. Fitch, 184 Kan 508, 337 P2d 1034 (1959); Williams v.

McDaniel v. Insurance Co. of Oregon

243 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1966

The insurance company relies upon the case of Murray v. Life Ins. … The Georgia court, in Betts v.

Salem College & Academy, Inc. v. Employment Division

298 Or. 471 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1985

V. … Catholic Bishop of Chicago, 440 US 490 , 99 S Ct 1313 , 59 L Ed 2d 533 (1979), concerning the National Labor Relations Board’s jurisdiction over church schools, that reserved judgment on the board’s argument that it could

Hofer v. Gofner

134 Or. 46 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1930

BROWN, J. This opinion refers particularly to the validity of that certain order made by the circuit court for Multnomah county, Oregon, rejecting the final account of Robert G. … The learned jurist then quotes from Waring v.

Hanner v. Silver

2 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1868

Com., 489; 1 Edward, 551; Griffith v. Buchan, 10 Barb., 432 .) … (Bloom v. Burdick, 1 Hill, 130 ; Dakin v. Hudson, 6 Cow., 221 .)

Thomas v. Smith-Wagoner Co.

114 Or. 69 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1925

Rae v. Heilig Theatre Co., 94 Or. 408 ( 185 Pac. 909 ); Hillyard v. Hewitt, 61 Or. 58 ( 120 Pac. 750 ); Aerne v. Gostlow, 60 Or. 113 ( 118 Pac. 277 ). … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Federation of Oregon Parole & Probation Officers v. State, Department of Corrections

322 Or. 215 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1995

For the reasons stated by Judge Riggs in the Court of Appeals’ opinion in this case, Federation of Oregon Parole v. … See FOPPO v. Corrections Division, 7 PECBR 5649, 5654-55 (1983) (discussing rule in the context of subcontracting).

Roberts v. Bodley

84 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1917

The plaintiff cites in support of his attack upon the ruling of the court Sullivan v. Oregon B. & N. Co., 12 Or. 392 ( 7 Pac. 508 , 53 Am. Rep. 364 ), and Fredenthal v. Brown, 52 Or. 33 ( 95 Pac. 1114 ). … Justice Harris, a writer of one of the majority opinions in State v. Farnum, 82 Or. 211 ( 161 Pac. 417 ). The defendant there was accused of murdering Edna Morgan.

Daniels v. Foster & Kleiser

95 Or. 502 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1920

While, as ruled in Lee Tung v. … Brown, 39 Or. 285 ( 64 Pac. 451 ); Reynolds v. New York Trust Co., 188 Fed. 611 ( 110 C. C. A. 409 , 39 L. R. A. (N. S,) 391); 2 R. C. L. 775. See, also, 1 C. J. 1033.

Brownstone Homes Condo. Assn. v. Brownstone Forest Hts.

Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 8, 2015

Brown. Brian C. Hickman, Gordon & Polscer, LLC, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondent on review. With him on the briefs was Gregory A. Baird. … In Couey v.

Minsinger v. United States National Bank

228 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 6, 1961

As the court said in Board of National Missions, Etc. v. … Johnson, 21 Conn Sup 126, 145 A2d 759 ; Keferl v. Trimbach, Ohio App., 125 NE2d 753 , appd 160 Ohio St 187, 115 NE2d 3 ; Coghlin v. Coghlin, 79 Ohio St 71, 85 NE 1058 ; Board of National Missions, Etc. v.

Klamath Development Co. v. Lewis

136 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 17, 1931

Such a spring is not subject to appropriation by a person other than the owner of the land: § 47-1401, Oregon Code 1930; Morrison v. … et al. v.

Bob Godfrey Pontiac, Inc. v. Roloff

291 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1981

In Brown v. … Brown , therefore, is best characterized as an extension of an existing common law cause of action, rather than creation of a new cause of action.

Bohle v. Matson Navigation Co.

243 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1966

Defendant cites Nielsen v. … Justice Brand in Godvig v.

Niemela v. Collings

267 Or. 369 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1973

Opinion 142 of the Oregon State Bar Committee on Legal Ethics, approved by the Board of (Governors, states, in essence, the same. … . # * * » Ainsworth v. Dunham, 235 Or 225, 230 , 384 P2d 214 (1963); Bratt v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 114 Or 644, 647 , 236 P 478 (1925).

Borman v. Blackmon

60 Or. 304 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1911

Spencer, 51 Or. 262 ( 94 Pac. 39 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 ( 64 Pac. 304 ). The equitable title of the plaintiff Borman to the placers mentioned in the complaint is not seriously questioned by the defendants. … An intent is a necessary element in the matter of abandonment: Watts v. Spencer, 51 Or. 262 ( 94 Pac. 39 ) ;Hough v. Porter, 51 Or. 318 ( 95 Pac. 732 : 98 Pac. 1083 : 102 Pac. 728 ). 3.

Hart v. Oregon Laundry Co.

91 Or. 324 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1919

In speaking of trover and conversion in Cooper v. Chitty, 1 Burr. 31, quoted with approval by Mr. Justice Slater in Swank v. … In Manning v. Brown, 47 Md. 506 , the circumstances were somewhat similar to those of Lee Tung v.

Li v. State

338 Or. 376 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2005

See, e.g., State v. Conger, 319 Or 484, 490 , 878 P2d 1089 (1994); Zockert v. Fanning, 310 Or 514, 520 , 800 P2d 773 (1990) (so stating). … For example, in Heisler v.

Mazurek v. Rajnus

253 Or. 555 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1969

However, the wind blew some of the sheets off the stack “a couple of times” and to prevent this plaintiff placed boards and a skill-saw on the top of the stack. … The judgment is affirmed. ① Murray v. Lamb, 174 Or 239 , 148 P2d 797 (1944). ② See cases collected in 2 Words and Phrases, “Act of God” (1955).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Coe

302 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1987

Before the Disciplinary Board’s trial panel, the Bar moved for an order striking the document from the record for failure to verify and failure to serve properly. … Those charges are filed in this court, and the proceedings are conducted by the Disciplinary Board as an arm of this court. ORS 9.534.