Case law

Hoffman v. Habighorst

49 Or. 379 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1907

Stratton was president oE the board of directors of the University and was a director in the Company. P. L. Willis Avas secretary of both corporations. Messrs. … Co. v. Story, 13 Tex. Civ. App. 124 ( 35 S. W. 68 ); Darke v. Board of Com'rs, 15 Utah, 467 ( 49 Pac. 257 ).

State v. Richards

Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 14, 2017

Assn. v. Sch. Dist., 290 Or 217, 228, 621 P2d 547 (1980). … White v. Jubitz Corp., 347 Or 212, 223 P3d 566 (2009); see also State v.

Hanner v. Silver

2 Or. 336 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 15, 1868

Com., 489; 1 Edward, 551; Griffith v. Buchan, 10 Barb., 432 .) … (Bloom v. Burdick, 1 Hill, 130 ; Dakin v. Hudson, 6 Cow., 221 .)

Nesbitt v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 2004

FILED: March 25, 2004 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON TIM NESBITT, Petitioner, v. HARDY MYERS, Attorney General, Respondent. (SC S51107) En Banc Submitted on the record January 21, 2004. … "SUMMARY: Under current law, public employees represented by a union may petition Employment Relations Board for an election to change or terminate union representation.

In Re Constitutionality of ORS 456.720

272 Or. 398 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1975

In Gibson v. … The more recent case of Carruthers v.

Robertson v. Martin

93 Or. 326 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1919

Brown, 17 Wash. 570 ( 50 Pac. 483 ); Whitaker v. McBride, 197 U. S. 510 (25 Sup. Ct. Rep. 530, 49 L. Ed. 857 ); Kneeland v. Korter, 40 Wash. 359 ( 82 Pac. 608 , 1 L. R. A. (N. … The trade of the Oregon farm to defendant Martin was made in gross and not by the acre: Ogilvie v. Stackland, 92 Or. 352 ( 179 Pac. 669 ). 3.

North Pacific Lum. Co. v. Spore

44 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1904

v. … Quinn, 42 Or. 1 , 69 Pac. 817 ), were solely ques *474 tions for the jury, and not within the province of this court to review in an action at law: Brown v. Oregon Lum. Co. 24 Or. 315 , 33 Pac. 557 .

State v. Wacker

317 Or. 419 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1993

State v. Owens, 302 Or 196, 206 , 729 P2d 524 (1986); State v. Louis, 296 Or 57, 60-61 , 672 P2d 708 (1983). … Texas v. Brown, 460 US 730, 740 , 103 S Ct 1535 , 75 L Ed 2d 502 (1983).

Snodgrass v. Wallowa Milling & Grain Co.

111 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 24, 1924

The evidence disclosed that the execution of the mortgage was authorized at a meeting of the board of directors of the Inland Motor Company. … Rep. 151 ); White Mountain Bank v. West et al., Trustees, 46 Me. 15 ; Moore v. Jacobucci, 70 *411 Colo. 171 ( 197 Pac. 1015 ); 11 C. J. 633, 634, § 347, notes 24, 26 and 28.

Jolly v. Kyle

27 Or. 95 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1895

Brown, 100 Cal. 626 ( 35 Pac. 323 ). … H. 362; Slater v. Dudley, 18 Pick. 373 ; Farlin v. Sook, 30 Kan. 401 (46 Am. Kep. 100, 1 Pac. 123 ); Bump on Fraudulent Conveyances, 215.

Savage v. Salem Mills Co.

48 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1906

v. … E. 702 ); Nelson v. Brown, 44 Iowa, 455 ; Bucher v. Commonwealth, 103 Pa. 528 . Decided 12 April, 1906. The judgment of the court below will be affirmed. Affirmed.

Stiger v. Persyn

138 Or. 178 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1931

Under such circumstances, fraud can not be based upon representations as to value: Castleman v. Stryker et al., 107 Or. 48 ( 213 P. 436 ). … J., Brown and Rand, J.T., concur.

State v. Turner

104 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1922

Rep. 546; Commonwealth v. Priestly, 10 Pa. Dist. Rep. 217; Commonwealth v. Andruchek, 26 Pa. Dist. Rep. 923; Commonwealth v. Snyder, 13 Pa. Dist. Rep. 27; People v. Neidhart, 35 Misc. Rep. 191 ( 71 N. Y. Supp. 591 ). … Com. 305; State v. Brown, 81 N. C. 568 ; 2 Wharton’s Criminal Procedure (10 ed.), §1301.

Mitchell v. Southern Pacific Co.

105 Or. 310 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1922

BROWN, J. … To similar effect are Consor v. Andrew, 61 Or. 483 ( 123 Pac. 46 ); Forrest v. Portland Ry. L. & P. Co., 64 Or. 240 ( 129 Pac. 1048 ); Buchanan v. Hicks, 66 Or. 503 ( 133 Pac. 780 , 134 Pac. 1191 ); Saxton v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Coe

302 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1987

Before the Disciplinary Board’s trial panel, the Bar moved for an order striking the document from the record for failure to verify and failure to serve properly. … Those charges are filed in this court, and the proceedings are conducted by the Disciplinary Board as an arm of this court. ORS 9.534.

State v. Fraser

105 Or. 589 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1922

S.) 601); State v. Case, 61 Or. 265 ( 122 Pac. 304 ); Quillin v. State, 79 Tex. Or. Rep. 497 ( 187 S. W. 199 , 5 A. L. R. 73 and annotation, p. 782); State v. Elliott, 61 Kan. 518 ( 59 Pac. 1049 ); People v. … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

Eckles v. State of Oregon

306 Or. 380 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1988

See 6 Couch on Insurance 2d 971-74, §§ 34:121-22 (rev ed 1985); see also Gilmore v. … If the facts would warrant such a distribution, presumably SAIF’s board would order it, for the general rule is that directors of a mutual insurance company cannot withhold a dividend that should be declared. Rhine v.

Finn v. Erickson

127 Or. 107 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1928

L., §§ 73, 74; McCargar v. Wiley, 112 Or. 215 , 220 et seq. ( 229 Pac. 665 ); Freeman v. Trummer, 50 Or. 287 ( 91 Pac. 1077 ); Guille v. Wong Fook, 13 Or. 577 ( 11 Pac. 277 ); 23 R. C. L., p. 872, §22; 23 R. C. … Bank v. Canal Bank, 239 U. S. 520 ( 60 L. Ed. 417 , Ann. Cas. 1917E, 25, 36 Sup. Ct. Rep. 194); Interstate Banking & Trust Co. v. Brown, 235 Fed. 32 .

De Phillips v. State Highway Commission

203 Or. 561 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1955

Leesi v. Yamhill County, 136 Or 295 , 298 P 911 . However, we do not believe that the above section applies to unincorporated towns. … It might just as well be argued that a school board is the governing body of a town because the school district over which it exercises jurisdiction includes the territory of the town.

McDermid v. Bourhill

109 Or. 633 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1924

Brown v. Volkening, 64 N. Y. 76, 80 . In Illinois Steel Co. v. Jeka, 123 Wis. 419, 429 ( 101 N. W. 399 ), the court, citing Booth v. … J., in Weeks v.