Case law

Eastern & Western Lumber Co. v. Henderson

129 Or. 102 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1929

.; Rockel, Mechanics’ Liens, 109 and 243, pages 285 and 583; Warrenton Lumber Co. v. Smith, 117 Or. 530, 533, 535 ( 245 Pac. 313 ); Dallas L. & M. Co. v. Wasio W. M. Co., 3 Or. 527 . … Bean, Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

Adams v. STATE COMPENSATION DEPARTMENT

249 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1968

This was appealed by the department to the review board which also allowed it. The department appealed to the circuit court which, on the record, affirmed the two previous decisions. … Philpott v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 234 Or 37 , 379 P2d 1010 (1963); Ramseth v. Maycock, 209 Or 66 , 304 P2d 415 (1956); Stuhr v. State Ind. Acc. Com’n., 186 Or 629 , 208 P2d 450 (1949); Kowcun v.

Jackson v. Franke

364 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 2019

In State v. … App. at 401 -05 , 974 P.2d 750 (concluding that diagnosis was not scientific evidence that required foundation set out in State v. Brown , 297 Or. 404 , 687 P.2d 751 (1984) ); Trager , 158 Or.

Prickett v. Cleek

13 Or. 415 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 10, 1886

In Jobson v. … (Shoemaker v. Board of Commissioners etc., 36 Ind. 181 ; Hayne on New Trial and Appeal, sec. 203, p. 613.) But there is nothing in this objection, as applied to the case here.

State ex rel. McCormick v. Appling

236 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1964

When the judge has reached “the age of retirement” it is the duty of the Public Employes’ Eetirement Board to so certify to the Governor, and to also certify whether a vacancy will be created by the judge’s retirement. … “Art V, § 16.

Olcott v. Hoff

92 Or. 462 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1919

When in Chadwick v. … A, board of three persons is the rule; a board of two persons is the exception. The office of governor as well as that of secretary of state is elective. An election is the rule; an appointment is the exception.

Umatilla County v. Dept. of Energy

Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 2024

Umatilla County had designated its county board as the special advisory group. … See Friends of Parrett Mountain v. Northwest Natural, 336 Or 93, 96, 79 P3d 869 (2003) (so stating); Save Our Rural Oregon v.

Savage v. Scroggin

83 Or. 51 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1917

C. 413 ; Shontz v. Brown, 27 Pac. 123 ; Stevens v. Hinckley, 43 Me. 440 ; Anderson v. Smith , 5 Blackf. (Ind.) 395; Seaman v. Hasbrouck, 35 Barb. (N. Y.) 151; Keen v. Kleckner, 42 Pa. 529 ; Bell v. … In Forbes v. Marsh, 15 Conn. 384 , and in Calkins v. Lockwood [16 Conn.] 276 [ 41 Am.

Brooks v. Bergholm

256 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1970

In State Highway Com’n v. … Our conclusion that evidence of the reputation of both parties is admissible finds support in Brown v.

Weinstein v. Wheeler

127 Or. 406 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1928

Justice McBride in Brown v. Oregon-Washington R. & N. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Duncan Lumber Co. v. Willapa Lumber Co.

93 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1919

Humphreys, 27 Or. 515 ( 41 Pac. 8 ); Maxwell v. Bolles, 28 Or. 1 ( 41 Pac. 661 ); Brown v. Feldwert, 46 Or. 363 ( 80 Pac. 414 ); Dutro v. Ladd, 50 Or. 120 ( 91 Pac. 459 ); Johnson v. … Sheridan Lumber Co., 51 Or. 35 ( 93 Pac. 470 ); Peters v. Queen City Ins. Co., 63 Or. 382 ( 126 Pac. 1005 ).

Miller v. Employment Division

290 Or. 285 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1980

We review the decision of the Court of Appeals reversing an administrative order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) in a contested case denying unemployment compensation to claimant. … Division v. N.W. Christian College, 31 Or *289 App 201, 570 P2d 100 (1977), rev den (1978); Emp. Div. v. Archdiocese, 42 Or App 421 , 600 P2d 926 (1979).

State v. Lhasawa

334 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2002

Selness, 334 Or at 535-36 ; Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 108 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … The Court of Appeals concluded that the Brown analysis was not relevant and that a historical investigation like that used in this court’s decision in State ex rel Juv. Dept. v.

Harris v. Southeast Portland Lumber Co.

123 Or. 549 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 25, 1927

Chief Justice Bean in McNear v. … MacRae v. Small, 48 Or. 139 ( 85 Pac. 503 ).

French v. Columbia Life & Trust Co.

80 Or. 412 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1916

Brown (Tex. Civ. App.), 166 S. … Co. v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.), 166 S. W. 658 . Having concluded that the notes are not prohibited by Section 4632, L. O.

Lynch v. Clark

183 Or. 431 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1948

You were under the impression that you hit a board, is that correct? “A. Well, some sort of an object. “Q. Well, you told the jury you were under the impression you hit a board or a box or something like that? “A. … Co. v.

Lafferty v. Newbry

200 Or. 685 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1954

It made provision for a board of three to be the official arbiters. The board does not include the Secretary of State. … In State v.

Mahana v. Miller

281 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1978

ORS 701.055 requires anyone in business as a builder to register with the Builders Board, an agency within the State Department of Commerce. … See, e.g., Hall v. Northwest Outward Bound School, Inc., 280 Or 655 , 572 P2d 1007 (1977); Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545 , 495 P2d 273 (1972). The opinion in Joseph v.

Jerman v. Jerman

129 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1929

See Billion v. Billion, 122 Or. 68 ( 256 Pac. 389, 769 ). 4, 5. … See, also, Schafer v.

Nelson v. Bartley

222 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1960

“This type of case has been up before our Supreme Court five or six times now, the Brown v. Underwood case, 172 Or 261 , 141 P2d 527 ; Inwall v. Transpacific Lumber Company, 165 Or 560 , 108 P2d 522 ; Atchison v. … Since Judge King expressed himself as above this court rendered two more decisions upon the subject matter of ORS 656.154: McGuire v. Brown, 217 Or 300 , 342 P2d 774 , and Claussen v. Ireland, 216 Or 289 , 338 P2d 676 .