Case law

Russell v. Crook County Court

75 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1915

And the words have been so construed: 7 Words & Phrases, *176 title “Sit”; Allen v. State, 102 Ga. 619 ( 29 S. E. 470 ); Cock v. State, 8 Tex. App. 659. … Rep. 786 ); State ex rel. v. Rhodes, 48 Or. 133 ( 85 Pac. 332 ); State v. McElrath, 49 Or. 294 ( 89 Pac. 803 ); Pacific Bridge Co. v. Clackamas County (C. C.), 45 Fed. 217 . Section 941, L. O.

Rugenstein v. Ottenheimer

78 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1915

As is said in the case of State ex rel. v. Board of Education, 19 Wash. 8 ( 52 Pac. 317 , 67 Am. St. Rep. 706 , 40 L. R. … Upon the former appeal in this case, Rugenstein v. Ottenheimer, 70 Or. 600 ( 140 Pac. 747 ), this court, speaking through Mr.

City of Rogue River v. DeBoer

288 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1980

Brown v. Johnston, 258 Or 284, 285-286 , 482 P2d 712 (1971); Archer v. Rogers Construction, 252 Or 165,169 , 447 P2d 380 (1968); Young v. Crown Zellerbach, 244 Or 251, 259 , 417 P2d 394 (1966). … Copeland Sand v. Ins. Co. of N.

Bowman v. Bradley

127 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1928

Eq.), 256; Williams v. Nelson, 23 Pick. (Mass.) 141 ( 34 Am. Dec. 45 ); White v. Crawford, 10 Mass. 191 ; Corning v. Gould, 16 Wend. (N. Y.) 531; Cuthbert v. Lawton, 3 McCord (S. C.), 194. … App. 544 ( 102 Pac. 952 ); Schmidt v. Brown, 226 Ill. 590 ( 80 N. E. 1071 , 117 Am. St. Rep. 261 , 11 L. R. A. (N. S.) 457). Other cases are cited by counsel but these suffice. The principle is well established.

Britt v. Marks

20 Or. 223 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1891

(Rolfes v. Russell, 5 Or. 400 ; Dunning v. Cresson, 6 Or. 241 .) 2. But the plaintiff’s counsel argued that mistake is alleged in the complaint and that of itself is sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to relief. … Googins, 99 Mass. 231 ; Morris Canal Co. v. Emmett, 9 Paige, 167 , 37 Am. Dec. 388 ; *229 Board of Com. v. Younger, 29 Cal. 172 ; Cram v. Union Bank, 42 Barb. 426 ; 2 Warvell on Vendors, 925.)

State ex rel. Mahoney v. McKinnon

8 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1880

(Commonwealth v. Wallper, S. & R. 29, cited in American Law of Elections, secs. 401 and 402.) The correct principle is announced in tbe case of Kerr v. … (American Law of Elections, secs. 169 and 170; People v. Moliter, 23 Mich. 341 ; Hancock v. Barnes, 4 Bush. Ky. 390.) Whether A. C.

Helms Groover & Dubber Co. v. Copenhagen

93 Or. 410 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 21, 1919

L., § 95, p. 120; Pach v. Geoffroy, 65 Hun, 619 ( 19 N. Y. Supp. 583 ). … See, also, Day v. Holland, 15 Or. 464 ( 15 Pac. 855 ); Toy v. Gong, 87 Or. 454 ( 170 Pac. 936 ); 3 C. J., § 1392, p. 1272, et seq. 7, 8.

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Appling

223 Or. 576 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1960

Todd, 109 Colo 326, 124 P2d 932 (1942); Oliason v. Girard, 57 Ida 41, 61 P2d 288, 290 (1936); Cosgriff v. Board of Election Com’rs., 151 Cal 407, 91 P 98 (1907). … The defendant in his brief also argues that Watson v. City of Salem, 84 Or 666 , 164 P 567 , 164 P 1184 (1917), and In re Board of Directors of North Unit Irr.

Hollin v. Libby, McNeill & Libby

253 Or. 8 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1969

Brown v. … In Weaver et al v.

In Re Swank's Estate

163 Or. 367 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1939

See Franklin v. Northrup, 107 Or. 537, 551 , 215 P. 494 ; Bannon v. Thompson, 136 Or. 311, 313 , 298 P. 907 . … Even under the rule stated in Ingram v.

Olston v. Oregon Water Power & Ry. Co.

52 Or. 343 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1908

. *358 433; Brown v. Freeman & Bynum, 79 Ala. 406 ; Strayhorn v . Giles, 22 Ark. 517 ; Milliken v. Thorndike, 103 Mass. 382 ; Irving v. Thomas, 18 Me. 418 . 13. … But in Williams v V. Haines, 27 Iowa, 251 ( 1 Am.

Minter v. Minter

80 Or. 369 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 9, 1916

Other authorities applicable to the question are here set down: Brown v. Morrill, 45 Minn. 483 ( 48 N. W. 328 ); Riedeburg v. Schmitt, 71 Wis. 644 ( 38 N. W. 336 ); In re Farmer (Ex parte Griffin), 18 N. B. … No. 4650; Duryea v. Burt, 28 Cal. 569 ; Wiegand v. Copeland (C. C.), 14 Fed. 118 ; Sigourney v. Munn, 7 Conn. 11 ; Roberts v. McCarty, 9 Ind. 16 ( 68 Am. Dec. 604 ); Marsh v. Davis, 33 Kan. 326 ( 6 Pac. 612 ); Tenney v.

Bloech v. Hyland Homes Co.

119 Or. 297 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1926

Also in Knight v. … Coshow, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Fraser v. Portland

81 Or. 92 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1916

A. 484); Carson v. Hayes, 39 Or. 97, 107 ( 65 Pac. 814); Bolter *96 v. Garrett, 44 Or. 304, 307 ( 75 Pac. 142 ); Brown v. Gold Coin Min. Co., 48 Or. 277, 284 ( 86 Pac. 361 ); Shaw v. … Co. v. Watkins, 53 Or. 212 ( 99 Pac. 884 ); National Fire Alarm Co. v.

State Ex Rel. Quisor v. Ellis

181 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1947

Templar v. State Board of Examiners, 131 Mich. 254 , 90 N. W. 1058 , 100 Am. St. Rep. 610 . … Sashihara v. State Board of Pharmacy, supra. State v. Stevens, 78 N.

In Re Will of Robert Carr

121 Or. 574 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1927

Mere suspicion of undue influence is not sufficient: Rice v. … J., and Coshow and Brown, JJ., concur.

Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting Council

320 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1994

Lesser Increase v. … Instead, the Oregon Progress Board has adopted a state Benchmark of stabilizing carbon dioxide emissions at the 1990 level.

In Re Guardianship of Lyon

128 Or. 94 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1928

V. Miller, directing him to appear and show cause, and requiring him to file a final account. A final account was -filed by W. V. Miller on September 12, 1925. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Portland Iron Works v. Siemens

135 Or. 219 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1930

W. 897 ); Jones v. Wettlin, 39 Wyo. 331 ( 271 P. 217 , 69 A. L. R. 840); Nelson v. Hudson, 221 Mo. App. 211 ( 299 S. W. 1111 ); Hall v. Wichita State Bank (Tex. Civ. App.), 254 S. W. 1036 . … J., Brown and Kelly, JJ., concur.

Waymire v. Shipley

52 Or. 464 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1908

If I wanted to use a gauge to split a board, I could do it that way. If I wanted a caliper rule, I could get it as Mr. Wildhart showed you here. I can use that in place of a caliper (shows how). … Allen, 56 Tex. 133 ; Bridges v. Robinson, 2 Tenn. Ch. 720, 724; Collins v. Jackson, 54 Mich. 186 ( 19 N. W. 947 ) ; Bain v. Withey & Ottman, 107 Ala. 223 ( 18 South. 217 ) ; Bondurant v.