Case law

Dockery v. Gardner

141 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 5, 1932

State v. Bartmess, 33 Or. 110 ( 54 P. 167 ); Farmers Bank v. Woodell, 38 Or. 294 ( 61 P. 837 ); State v. Megorden, 49 Or. 269 ( 88 P. 306 , 14 Ann. Cas. 130), and many others. … Band, Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Holden v. Gulstrom

89 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 11, 1918

There was a like holding in Lunn v. Gage, 37 Ill. 20 ( 87 Am. Dec. 233 ). … *140 Seabrook, Admr., 39 Ga. 14 ; Brown v.

Whisnant v. Holland

206 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1956

Denton v. Arnstein, 197 Or 28 , 250 P2d 407 ; Whitehead v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc., 194 Or 186 , 239 P2d 226 . … The court in the Smith case must have overlooked its previous holdings upon this issue of law, and the clear reasons therefor as set out in Sylvis v. Hays, 138 Or 418 , 6 P2d 1098 , Brown v.

State v. Glasburn

116 Or. 451 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1925

Russel, 64 Or. 247, 250 ( 129 Pac. 1051 ); State v. Hill, 63 Or. 457 , 459 ( 128 Pac. 444 ); State v. Chase, 106 Or. 263, 274 , par. 10 ( 211 Pac. 920 ); State v. … J., and Brown and Band, JJ., concur.

Collins v. Creason

55 Or. 524 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1910

Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 : 45 L. R. A. 642). Conner v. Banks, 18 Ala. 42 ( 52 Am. Dec. 209 ). 2.

Kroft v. Grimm

225 Or. 247 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 21, 1960

As I opened the door, right under me, I seen some little fanny sitting there on the running board, so I run them off. … Ritchie v. Thomas et al., 190 Or 95 , 224 P2d 543 ; Clemens v. Smith, 170 Or 400 , 134 P2d 424 ; Graham v. Corvallis & E. R.

Mahana v. Miller

281 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1978

ORS 701.055 requires anyone in business as a builder to register with the Builders Board, an agency within the State Department of Commerce. … See, e.g., Hall v. Northwest Outward Bound School, Inc., 280 Or 655 , 572 P2d 1007 (1977); Joseph v. Lowery, 261 Or 545 , 495 P2d 273 (1972). The opinion in Joseph v.

Malcow v. Malcow

243 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 25, 1966

Defendant wife answered, requesting permanent separation from bed and board. At the time of their marriage husband and wife were approximately 42 and 44 years of age respectively. … Evans v. Evans, 176 Or 403, 417 , 157 P2d 495 (1945). Though the trial judge did make the verbal statement attributed to him by defendant, after reflection he entered findings of fact that plaintiff was not at fault.

Lowe v. City of Eugene

463 P.2d 360 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1969

McCollum v. Board of Education, 333 U.S. 203 , 68 S.Ct. 461 , 92 L.Ed. 649 , 2 A.L.R.2d 1338 (1948). … Torcaso v. Watkins, 367 U.S. 488 , 81 S.Ct. 1680 , 6 L.Ed.2d 982 (1961). As it was expressed by Mr. Justice Jackson in West Virginia State Board of Education v.

Wolfer v. Hurst

47 Or. 156 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 28, 1905

. § 547; State v. Brown, 5 Or. 119 ; Basche v. Pringle, 21 Or. 24 ( 26 Pac. 863 ). … Scott, 10 Or. 483 ; Harrington v. Watson, 11 Or. 143 ( 3 Pac. 173 50 Am. Rep. 465 ); Aiken v. Aiken, 12 Or. 203 ( 6 Pac. 682 ); Danvers v. Durkin, 14 Or. 37 ( 12 Pac. 60 ); Belfils v.

McFarland v. Carlsbad Sanatorium Co.

68 Or. 530 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1913

In Bailey v. … S.) 716, Bacon, V. C., says: “It is no part of the duties of a director to take part in every transaction which is conducted at a board meeting.

D. M. Osborne & Co. v. Hubbard

11 L.R.A. 833 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 12, 1891

(In Brown v. Jordhal, 32 Minn. 137 , 50 Am. Rep. 560 , the identical question raised here was thus disposed of by C-illeillan, C. … In Whittington v.

State v. Kellar

349 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 2011

See Brown v. … Stevens v. Czerniak, 336 Or 392, 401 , 84 P3d 140 (2004); see State v. Barrett, 331 Or 27, 32 , 10 P3d 901 (2000) (same). In this case, the statutory context cuts against defendant’s interpretation in three respects.

Toon v. Wapinitia Irrigation Co.

117 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1926

BROWN, J. Our Code provides that, in cases tried to the court without a jury, “the finding of the court upon the facts shall be deemed a verdict.* * ” Section 159, Or. L. … Rep. 974); Nesbit v. Independent District of Riverside, 144 U. S. 610 ( 36 L. Ed. 562 , 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 746); Benwell v. City of Newark, 55 N. J.

Fratt v. Wilson

30 Or. 542 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1897

In Brown v. Deschuttes Bridge Co., 23 Or. 7 ( 35 Pac. 177 ); and in Dunham v. … Caspari, 80 Me. 234 ( 14 Atl. 12 ); Murphy v. Winter, 18 Ga. 690 ; Thompson v. Cowell, 148 Mass. 552 ( 20 N. E. 170 ).

McKiney v. Cardinal Services

Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 2001

The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Rash v. McKinstry Co. , 331 Or 665 , 20 P3d 197 (2001). … *Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board, 166 Or App 170 , 998 P2d 742 (2000) .

Manley Auto Co. v. Jackson

115 Or. 396 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1925

Smith, 43 Or. 315, 321 ( 70 Pac. 704 , 73 Pac. 340 ); McDaniel v. Chiaramonte, supra; International Harv. Co. v. Bauer, supra; First Nat. Bank of Sheridan v. Yocom, 96 Or. 438 ( 189 Pac. 220 ); Endicott v. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Parker v. Parker

241 Or. 623 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1965

Plaintiff filed an amended complaint asking a separation from bed and board only. The case was reassigned and tried on its merits. … Justice Lusk in Barone v. Barone, 207 Or 26, 29 , 294 P2d 609 (1956) that “a statement from the bench does not constitute a judgment until reduced to an order, decree or judgment.” Also, see Rowe v.

Oregon v. Carlson

40 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1902

A. 252 ); Billings v. Aspen Min. & Smelt. Co. 52 Fed. 250 ( 3 C. C. A. 69 ); *568 Bogan v. Edenburgh Am. L. Mtg. Co. 63 Fed. 192 ( 11 C. C. A. 128 ); In re Krogstad, 4 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 564; Lyman v. … Int. 474; Rougeot v. Weir, 13 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 242; Phillips v. Sero, 14 Land Dec. Dep. Int. 568.

Shaw v. Northwest Truck Repair, Inc.

273 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 6, 1975

of Trustees may waive the payment of any liquidated damages in any particular case upon the establishment of good cause satisfactory to the Board of Trustees. … In Harty v.