Case law

Eldred v. United Amusement Co.

137 Or. 452 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1931

This was a question for the jury to determine, taking into consideration all the other facts and circumstances of the case: Gillilan v. Portland Crematorium Ass’n, 120 Or. 286 ( 249 P. 627 ); Richardson v. … J., Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Metschan v. Grant County

36 Or. 117 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1899

of the common schools ; but we do not understand that it is claimed that money collected on a forfeited bail bond becomes a part of the irreducible school fund of the state, subject to the control and management of the board … In Grant County v. Lake County, 17 Or. 453 ( 21 Pac. 447 ), and in State v.

Lathrop v. Modern Woodmen of America

56 Or. 440 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1910

Holding to the same effect are Lorscher v. Knights of Honor, 72 Mich. 316, 328 ( 40 N. W. 545 : 2 L. R. A. 206); Pledger v. Woodmen of the World, 17 Tex. Civ. App. 18 ( 42 S. W. 653 ); Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. … W. v. Brown, 88 S. W. 372 ; O’Neal v. Sovereign , Camp W. O. W., 130 Ky. 68 ( 113 S. W. 52 ); Tracy v. Supreme Court of Honor, 4 Neb. (Unof.) 189 , ( 93 N.

Collins v. United Brokers Co.

99 Or. 556 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1921

BROWN, J. 1,2. At the conclusion of the evidence, the defendant moved the court for an order directing the jury to return a verdict in its favor. The refusal of the court to grant the motion is predicated as error. … E. 362 ); McGrew v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 177 Mo. 533 ( 76 S. W. 995 ). As aptly stated by Justice Moore in Hill v.

In Re Discipline of Devers

317 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 29, 1993

Pursuant to BR 3.5, the State Professional Responsibility Board has recommended that the accused be suspended from the practice of law in Oregon for his unethical conduct as a lawyer in Michigan. … Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 US 371, 378 , 91 S Ct 780 , 28 L Ed 2d 113 (1971); Windsor v. McVeigh, 93 US 274, 278 , 23 L Ed 914 (1876).

Miles v. Hemenway

59 Or. 318 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1910

Brown, 34 Or. 454 , 458: 56 Pac. 171 : 45 L. R. … Button v. Schroyer, 5 Wis. 598 ; Baker v. Beach, 15 Wis. 108 ; Nelson v. Jacobs, 99 Wis. 547 ( 75 N. W. 406 ). In Sievers v. Brown, 84 Or. 454, 458 ( 56 Pac. 171 : 45 L. R.

Barrell v. Title Guarantee Co.

27 Or. 77 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1895

See, also, Blanchard v. Brown, 70 U. S. (3 Wall.) 248 ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 ( 41 N. W. 238 ); Dawley v. Brown, 79 N. Y. 390 ; Hawley v. Simmons, 102 Ill. 115 . … In Marshall v.

Marsters v. Umpqua Oil Co.

49 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1907

It had a board of directors and other corporate officers, and was exercising the functions of a corporation. The legality of its organization cannot, therefore, be inquired into in this action. … Co. v. Coosa Furnace Co. 95 Ala. 614 ( 10 South. 290 : 36 Am. St. Rep. 251 ); Campbell v. Argenta Gold & S. Min. Co. (C. C.), 51 Fed. 1. 3.

Goodwin v. Kingsmen Plastering, Inc.

359 Or. 694 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2016

Shell v. … Still later in that hearing, Vice-Chair Walt Brown asked how, specifically, the proposed amendment would change existing law.

Mattison v. Mattison

53 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1909

Rep. 504 ); Steib v. Whitehead, 111 Ill. 247 ; Roberts v. Stevens, 84 Me. 325 ( 24 Atl. 873 : 17 L. R. A. 266); Leigh v. Harrison, 69 Miss. 923 ( 11 South. 604 : 18 L. R. A. 49); Smith v. … Seymour v. McAvoy, 121 Cal. 438 ( 53 Pac. 946 : 41 L. R. A. 544); Baker v. Brown, 146 Mass. 369 ( 15 N. E. 783 ); Smith v. Towers, 69 Md. 77 ( 14 Atl. 497 : 15 Atl. 92 : 9 Am. St. Rep. 398 ); Partridge v.

Johnson v. Prineville

100 Or. 119 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 1921

As stated in Gerhart v. Fout, 67 Mo. App. 423 : “The rule is not * * that a person cannot split his cause of action, but that he cannot split it without his debtor’s consent.” In Edmonston v. Jones, 96 Mo. … Bean, Benson and Brown, JJ., concur.

Mid-County Cemetery District v. Thomason

267 Or. 637 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1974

See City of Oakland v. Burns, 46 Cal 2d 401, 407, 296 P2d 333 (1956); City and County of Denver v. … See: McQuillin op. cit. 636," biting *644 Denver v. Publix Cab Co., supra; City of Elsa v. Weaver (Tex Civ App) 304 SW2d 212 (1957); Galewski v. Noe, 266 Wis 7, 62 NW2d 703 (1954); East Birmingham, Realty Co. v.

Geis v. Gallus

130 Or. 619 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1929

In the case of Hubner v. … Brown, J., took no part in the consideration of this case,

Sitton v. Peyree

117 Or. 107 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1925

BROWN, J. For the facts in this case and the issues made by the pleadings, see our original opinion rendered on November 24, 1925, and reported ante, p. 107 ( 241 Pac. 62 ). … State v. Steeves, 29 Or. 85, 103 ( 43 Pac. 947, 952 ). To like effect is Gowan-Lenning-Brown Co. v. Kingman (Or.), 242 Pac. 351 , decided by this court on January 12, 1926.

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2001

CONSUELO TRUJILLO, Petitioner on Review, v. PACIFIC SAFETY SUPPLY and SAIF CORPORATION, Respondents on Review. … The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Koskela v.

Teledyne Wah Chang Albany v. Employment Division

302 Or. 186 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1986

McKinney v. Employment Division, 21 Or App 730, 737 , 537 P2d 126 (1975).” Teledyne Wah Chan Albany v. Employment Div., supra, 77 Or App at 152-53 . … See Combustion Engineering, Inc. v. O’Connor, 395 SW2d 528 (Mo Ct App 1965).

Gildersleeve v. Lee

100 Or. 578 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1921

BROWN, J. The pivotal point in this case is the right of the plaintiff to convey a title in fee to the land devised to him by his wife, Pearl D. Gildersleeve. … L.; Moreland v. Brady, 8 Or. 303 ( 34 Am. Rep. 581 ); Shadden v. Hembree, 17 Or. 14 ( 18 Pac. 572 ); Jasper v. Jasper, 17 Or. 590 ( 22 Pac. 152 ); Portland Trust Co. v. Beatie, 32 Or. 305 ( 52 Pac. 89 ); Love v.

Riggs v. New Jersey Fidelity & Plate Glass Co.

126 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1928

J. 459, § 59; Doran v. Davis, 43 Iowa, 86 ; Fidelity & Dep. Co. of Maryland v. Hibbler, 177 Mich. 490 ( 143 N. W. 604 ). … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

State v. Welch

264 Or. 388 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1973

In State v. … The second related situation which must be distinguished from the present case is the one with which this court dealt in State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972).

Giesy v. Amer. Nat. Bank of Portland

152 Or. 516 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1935

In Wannamaker v. … See Wyman v. Wallace, 201 U. S. 230 , 26 S. Ct. 495 , 50 L. Ed. 738 ; Chase v. Hall (C. C. A.), 30 F. (2d) 195.”