Case law

State v. Ah Lee

18 Or. 540 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 4, 1890

State v. Dodson, 4 Or. 64 ; State v. Spencer, 6 Or. 152 ; State v. Brown, 7 Or. 186 ; State v. Lee Yan Yan, 10 Or. 365 , and it must not be overlooked that State v. Spencer, supra, was upon a charge of perjury. … S. v. Bowman, 2 Wash. cc. Rep. 328; U. S. v. McNeal, 1 Gallison, 387 ; Commonwealth v. Monahan, 9 Gray, 119 ; State v. Oppenheimer, 41 Tex. 82 ; People v. Parsons, 6 Cal. 487 ; McMurray v. State, 6 Ala. 324 .

Kershaw v. City of Willamina

119 Or. 543 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1926

City of Eugene, 95 Or. 597 ( 187 Pac. 841 , 188 Pac. 711 ); Dennis v. City of Willamina, 80 Or. 486 (157 Pac. *548 799); Portland v. … J., and Brown and Coshow, JJ., concur.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Clinton

267 Or. 653 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1974

Ford v. Gilbert, 44 Or 259, 262 , 75 P 138 (1904); Upham et al v. Bramwell, 105 Or 597, 615-16, 627 , 209 P 100 , 210 P 706 (1922); Kinney v. Uglow, 163 Or 539, 584 , 98 P2d 1006 (1940); and State Land Board v. … v.

Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Spokesman Publishing Co.

127 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1928

Dolan, 122 Or. 572 , and cases cited in 579 ( 260 Pac. 224 ); Browning v. Waycross, 233 U. S. 16 ( 58 L. Ed. 828 , 34 Sup. Ct. Rep. 578); General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia, 246 U. S. 500 ( 62 L. Ed. 854 , 38 Sup. … Co. v. Colley , above; Cooper Mfg. Co. v. Ferguson, 113 U. S. 727, 728, 734 ( 28 L. Ed. 1137 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 739); Crutcher v. Kentucky, 141 U. S. 47, 56, 57 ( 35 L. Ed. 649 , 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 851).

Engfors v. Nelson Steamship Co.

131 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1929

Co. v. Johnson, 289 Fed. 964 ; Reithley v. North Pac. S. S. Co., 232 Fed. 255 ; Roberts v. C., C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co., 202 Ill. App. 480 ; Harness v. Baltimore & O. R. Co., 86 W. Va. 284 ( 103 S. E., 866 ). … Brown, J., absent.

Portland v. Cook

48 Or. 550 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1906

Ed. 989 ) ; State ex. rel. v. Bonnell, 119 Ind. 494 ( 21 N. E. 1101 ); Fell v. State, 42 Md. 71 ( 20 Am. Rep. 83 ); State v. Cooke, 24 Minn. 247 ( 31 Am. Rep. 344 ); Wallace v. Mayor, 27 Nev. 71 ( 73 Pac. 528 , 63 L. R. … Commonwealth v. Wyatt, 6 Eand. (Ya.) 694; Commonwealth v. Pegram, 1 Leigh (Ya.) 569; Allen v. Commonwealth> 2 Leigh (Ya.) 727; Pitman v. Commonwealth, 2 Eob. (Ya.) 800; Miles v. State, 40 Ala. 39 ; Mongeon v.

Howco Leasing Corp. v. Oregon Lumber Export Co.

283 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1978

Albright v. Browne, 55 Or 599, 603 , 107 P 458 (1910). See also 66 Am Jur 2d 862, Replevin §§ 43-44 (1973). … See Shepherd v. Hub Lumber Co., 273 Or 331, 342-43 , 541 P2d 439 (1975); Williams v. International Co., 172 Or 270, 279, 284-85 , 141 P2d 837 (1943); and Coffin v. Taylor, 16 Or 375, 380 , 18 P 638 (1888).

Ruckman v. Union Railway Co.

69 L.R.A. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1904

Tolman, 12 Or. 289 , 7 Pac. 103 ; Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or. 96 , 25 Pac. 362 , 11 L. R. A. 155, 23 Am. St. Rep. 95 ; Belle v. Brown, 37 Or. 588 , 61 Pac. 1024 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 , 68 Pac. 739 , 93 Am. St. … In Patterson v. Wold (C.

Paulson v. City of Portland

16 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1888

Citizen’s Gaslight Co. of the City of Brooklyn v. Board of Assessors of the City of Brooklyn, 39 N. Y. 81 ; Kennedy v. City of Troy, 77 N. Y. 493 ; Le Roy v. Mayor etc. 20 Johns. 430 ; 11 Am. Dec. 289 ; Heywood v. … Co. v. Nolan et al. Board of Assessors of the City of Albany, 48 N. Y. 513 ; Rhea v. Umatilla Co. 2 Or. 298; Poppleton v. Yamhill Co. 8 Or. 338 ; Oregon & W. M. Savings Bank v. Jordan, 16 Or. 113 .)

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Martin

308 Or. 125 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989

He appeared at the hearing before the Trial Panel of the Disciplinary Board but presented no evidence. … State v. Martin, 95 Or App 170 , 769 P2d 203 (1989).

Skiff v. Riddle Lumber Co.

124 Or. 311 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1928

While this litigation was pending, a meeting of the stockholders and board of directors was held. … Ada V. Skiff was actually delivered to Frank S.

Marshall v. Marshall

98 Or. 500 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1921

The case of Long v. … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Shipman v. Gladden

253 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1969

. * * *" People v. Brown (Ill. 1968) 235 N.E.2d 562, 565 . … Brown, 372 U.S. 477 , 83 S.Ct. 768 , 9 L.Ed.2d 892 (1963), and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed. 493 (1967), relied upon by the majority, are not to the contrary.

Robinson v. Lewis

254 Or. 52 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1969

See Cierpisz v. Singleton, 247 Md 215, 230 A2d 629 (1967); Miller v. Miller, 273 NC 228, 160 SE2d 65 (1968); Bentzler v. Braun, 34 Wis 2d 362 , 149 NW2d 626, 639 (1967). … We agree with the wellreasoned opinion in Miller v. Miller, supra, in which the other leading cases are reviewed. See also, Cierpisz v. Singleton, supra; Lipscomb v. Diamiani (Del, 1967) 226 A2d 914 ; Brown v.

Miller v. City of Woodburn

126 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1928

BROWN, J. Plaintiff earnestly contends that the court should have directed a verdict in his favor. … A. 254); Niagara Oil Co. v. Ogle, 177 Ind. 292 ( 98 N. E. 60 , Ann. Cas. 1914D, 67, 42 L. R. A. (N. S.) 714); Holsman v. Boiling Spring Bleaching Co., 14 N. J. Eq. 335.” Theiler v.

St. Benedict's Abbey v. Marion County

50 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1908

Law (2 ed.), 1183; Lewis et al. v. Jjaylin et al. 46 0'hio St. 663 ( 23 N. E. 288 ); Williams v. Cammack, 27 Miss. 209 ( 61 Am. Dec. 508 ); Graham, etc., v. Conger, etc. 85 Ky. 582 ( 4 S. W. 327 ) ; Malchus v. … It is within the power of the legislature to fix the sum to be raised, and also to prescribe the benefited district, or they may delegate one or both of these questions to-a local board or bodyr: King v.

Colhouer v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

275 Or. 559 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1976

He relies on Buck v. … Belle v. Brown, 37 Or 588, 592-593 , 61 P 1024 (1900). Similar reasoning is applied in an analogous case, Call v. Jeremiah, 246 Or 568 , 425 P2d 502 (1967). The prior judgment and decree extinguished Colhouer’s claim.

Rowe v. Rowe

76 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1915

Rep. 682); Bleuer v. Bleuer, 27 Okl. 25 ( 110 Pac. 736 ); Mayer v. Mayer, 154 Mich. 386 ( 117 N. W. 890 , 129 Am. St. Rep. 477 , 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 245). In Sistare v. Sistare , Mr. … and credit clause, provided no modification of the decree has been made prior to the maturity of the installments, since, as declared in the Barber Case, ‘ alimony decreed to a wife in a divorce of separation from bed and board

Wiggins v. Wiggins

174 Or. 181 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1944

Neely v. Neely, 162 Or. 610 , 94 P. (2d) 300 ; Steele v. Steele, 96 Or. 630 , 190 P. 716 . The plaintiff not only told her husband that she does not love him, but demonstrated that fact by her actions. … Kaller v. Spady, 144 Or. 206 , 10 P. (2d) 1119 , 24 P. (2d) 351 .

Davis v. Emmons

32 Or. 389 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1898

Supp. 317 ; Consaul v. Sheldon, 35 Neb. 247 ( 52 N. W. 1104 ); Lumber Company v. Newkirk, 80 Cal. 275 ( 22 Pac. 231 ). … Law (1st Ed.), 612: Rowe v. Godfrey, 16 Me. 128 ; Brown v. Foss, 16 Me. 257 ; Walsh v. Agnew, 12 Mo. 343 ; Chambers v. Hunt, 22 N. J. Law, 552.