Case law

Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Public Utility Commission

325 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1997

Petitioners Forelaws on Board (FOB) and Utility Reform Project (URP) appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Coalition for Safe Power v. PUC, 139 Or App 358 , 911 P2d 1272 (1996). … Relying on its own opinion in Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Bettis

342 Or. 232 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 29, 2006

The caption on the waiver form stated “State of Oregon v. Benjamin Pinto-Roman.” … In 1994, the State Professional Responsibility Board (board) admonished the accused for violation of DR 5-101(A) (lawyer self-interest conflict).

Turner v. Jackson

139 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1931

Harrington, 90 Or. 295 ( 176 P. 430 ); Kinney v. Scheussel, 116 Or. 376 ( 239 P. 818 ); Hattrem v. Salmon River Improvement District, 132 Or. 297 ( 285 P. 231 ). … J., Rand and Brown, JJ., concur. Former opinion adhered to on rehearing May 31,1932.

Mount v. DCBS

Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 2001

The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc. , 331 Or 362 , 15 P3d 548 (2000). … *Judicial Review from the Workers' Compensation Board. 161 Or App 664 , 986 P2d 28 (1999). **Balmer, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Stearns v. Commission of Public Docks

240 Or. 255 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1965

In Stanley, Adm. v. Mueller, 211 Or 198 , 315 P2d 125 , 71 ALR2d 715 (1957), we interpreted this section. … Plaintiffs fear that if other parties must be joined, jurisdiction of the controversy will be pre-empted by federal law to the National Labor Relations Board.

Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.

141 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1932

BROWN, J. … In the earlier case of Bowman v.

Fendall v. Miller

99 Or. 610 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1921

J. 923, 924; Brown v. Kemp, 46 Or. 517 ( 81 Pac. 236 ). *620 The defendants were not satisfied with the character of the right of way which they had by virtue of law. … J. 983, 987, and notes; De Vore v. Ellis, 62 Iowa, 505 ( 17 N. W. 740 ); Welch v. Wilcox, 101 Mass. 162 ( 100 Am. Dec. 113 ); Goodale v. Goodale, 107 Me. 301 ( 78 Atl. 567 ); Ledford v. Cummins, 20 Ky. Law Rep. 393 .

Kuhnhausen v. Stadelman

174 Or. 290 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1944

Brown, 28 *301 Iowa 37, 4 Am. Rep. 151 ; Stancliff v. Palmeter, 18 Ind. 321 ; Stone v. Stevens, 12 Conn. 219 , 30 Am. Dec. 611 ; Strehlow v. Pettit, 96 Wis. 22, 26 , 71 N. W. 102 ; Sutor v. Wood, 76 Tex. 403 , 13 S. … The same is true of the membership of the State Board of Medical Examiners: State v. Lee Chue, 130 Or. 99 , 279 P. 285 .

Jackson v. State Industrial Accident Commission

114 Or. 373 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 10, 1925

To attempt to decide any question otherwise than as authorized by law would be an idle waste of time: 17 Stand.Proc. 657; Evans v. Christian, 4 Or. 375, 377 ; Dippold v. … R. 682); Degidio v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 105 Or. 642 ( 207 Pac. 176 ); Rohde v. State Industrial Acc. Com., 108 Or. 426 ( 217 Pac. 627 ).

Oregon Republican Party v. State of Oregon

301 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1986

It is both ‘capable of repetition, yet evading review,’ Whipple v. … Perry v. Oregon Liquor Commission, 180 Or 495, 498-499 , 177 P2d 406 (1947); Harris v. Board of Parole, 47 Or App 289 , 291-292 n 2, 614 P2d 602 , rev den 290 Or 157 (1980); see also Int’l Electrical Workers v.

Oregon v. Pacific States Tel. & Tel. Co.

53 Or. 162 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1909

What is said on the subject in Kadderly v . … New England Slate & Tile Co., 13 Allen (Mass.) 391; Commonwealth v. Railroad Co., 150 Pa. 234 ( 24 Atl. 609 ); Wil. Col. & Augusta R. Co. v. Board of Commissioners of Brunswick County, 72 N.

Smyth v. George W. Bates & Co.

112 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1924

Neither has Wehrung v. Denham, 42 Or. 386 ( 71 Pac. 133 ), any legal application to this case. … J., p. 757, §1871, and cases there cited; Waterman on Set-Off (2 ed.), p. 23, §21; Fishburne v. Merchants Bank, 42 Wash. 473 ( 85 Pac. 38 , 7 Ann. Cas. 848); Ainsworth v.

State v. Hightower

361 Or. 412 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 2017

Brown, 342 Md 404, 415, 676 A2d 513, 518 (1996) (abuse of discretion standard); Com v. Chapman, 8 Mass App Ct 260, 265, 392 NE2d 1213, 1217 (1979) (request is timely if made before jury is empanelled); State v. … Bean, 171 Vt 290, 297, 762 A2d 1259, 1264 (2000) (same); Thomas v. Com, 260 Va 553, 559, 539 SE2d 79, 82 (2000) (same); State v. Brown, 177 W Va 633, 638, 355 SE2d 614, 619 (1987) (same); Hamiel v.

Shields v. W. R. Grace & Co.

91 Or. 187 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1919

We do not see how this was material, in view of the testimony which shows conclusively that the nets, if they were on board the ship, were not placed in position, and that the hatch covers, or other devices, were not placed … Co., 36 Iowa, 31, 38 ; Austin v. Chicago etc. R. Co., 93 Iowa, 236 ( 61 N. W. 849 ); Douglas v. Chicago etc. R. R. Co., 100 Wis. 405 ( 76 N. W. 356 , 69 Am. St. Rep. 930 ). *200 2-4.

Richards v. Smith

260 Or. 586 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1971

See Herrera v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 71 Cal2d 254, 78 Cal Rptr 497, 455 P2d 425, 428 (1969) (Payment of full wages during period of total disability constitutes payment of workmen’s compensation.). … Wynn v. Sundquist, 259 Or 125, 131 , 485 P2d 1085 (1971). McAllister, J., dissents.

Zilesch v. Polk County

107 Or. 659 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 29, 1923

State, 11 Or. 512 ( 6 Pac. 70 ); Crawford v. Linn County, *667 11 Or. 482 ( 5 Pac. 738 ); State v. Cochran, 55 Or. 157, 180 ( 104 Pac. 419 , 105 Pac. 884 ). … Brown and McCourt, JJ., took no part in the consideration of this case.

Hurst v. Larson

94 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1919

In Holmes v. … Or, as said in Sawtelle v.

Lytle v. Payette-Oregon Slope Irrigation District

175 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1944

Bradley v. Brown, 86 Iowa 359 , 53 N. W. 268 . … Bradley v. Brown, supra.

Michelin Tire Co. of Calif. v. Williams

125 Or. 689 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1928

at first impression was inclined to the opinion that the delivery to plaintiff of the guaranty might be construed as an “earnest” to take the contract out of the statute, but the authorities are to the contrary: Walker v. … partial performance of an oral contract in regard to the conveyance of lands has been sometimes held in equity to take a contract out of the statute, such has never been the rule in regard to a contract for the sale of goods: Browne

Mathews v. Tobias

101 Or. 605 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1921

BROWN, J. This case, like many others, illustrates the ambulatory character of wills. The devising of property by will is a right conferred by law. So far as the statute is concerned, Anna E. … Schleich, 37 Or. 613 ( 62 Pac. 792 ); Zeuske v. Zeuske, 62 Or. 46 ( 124 Pac. 203 ); Thayer v. Thayer, 69 Or. 138 ( 138 Pac. 478 ).” Skinner v. Furnas, 82 Or. 414, 421 ( 161 Pac. 962 ). To like effect is Riggs v.