Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

1.38s

  • Brower Lumber Co. v. Miller

    28 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1898

    Justice Brown, in Constable v. National Steamship Company, 154 U. S. 73, (14 Sup. Ct. 1062,) “It is by no means a universal rule that a person may sue upon a contract made for his benefit, to which he was not a party.” … Larkin, 36 Kan. 246 ( 13 Pac. 398 ); Anderson v. Fitzgerald, 21 Fed. 294 ; Weller v. Goble, 66 Iowa, 113 ( 23 N. W. 290 ); Durnherr v. Rau, 135 N. Y. 219 ( 32 N. E. 49 ); Parlin v. Hall, 2 N. D. 473 ( 52 N.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Kelsey v. Norblad, Governor

    136 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1930

    The contemporaneous construction of a statute by those charged with its execution is entitled to weight: Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co., 133 Or. 468 ( 286 P. 527 , 291 P. 375 ); Portland v. … Welch, 126 Or. 293 ( 269 P. 868 ); *79 Spencer v. City of Portland, 114 Or. 381 ( 235 P. 279 ); Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irrigation Dist., 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Eastern Oregon State College

    Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 2001

    BARBARA JOHNSON, Petitioner on Review, v. EASTERN OREGON STATE COLLEGE and SAIF CORPORATION, Respondents on Review. … *Judicial review from the Workers' Compensation Board, 159 Or App 663 , 978 P2d 451 (1999) .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

    320 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1995

    Plaintiff did not seek judicial review of the Board’s order. … Dethlefs v.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Pendleton Grain Growers v. Pedro

    271 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 7, 1975

    V. … Brown v. Jones, 137 Or 520, 523 , 3 P2d 768 (1931). See also 17A CJS Contracts § 549b. Plaintiff has the burden to establish the existence of a valid contract and the breach thereof.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Strandholm v. General Construction Co.

    235 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

    Browning et al, 1943, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599, 600 . … Neal v. Haight, 187 Or 13, 32 , 206 P2d 1197 ; Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599 ; Timmins v. Hale, 122 Or 24, 32 , 256 P 770 ; Spokane County v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Devlin v. Moore

    64 Or. 433 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1913

    In Deadrick v. Bank, 100 Tenn. 457, 463 ( 45 S. … Rankin v. Cooper (C. C.), 149 Fed. 1010, 1013 . See, also, Campbell v. Watson, 62 N. J. Eq. 396 ( 50 Atl. 120 ). 13.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Van Lom v. Schneiderman

    187 Or. 89 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1949

    Robertson v. Frey, 72 Or. 599 , 144 P. 128 , is an instance where this court affirmed the judgment notwithstanding error in the record. Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or. 350 , 133 P. (2d) 599 ; McDaniels v. … Browning we sustained the action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict in an action to recover for the lolling and injuring of a large number of turkeys.

    Overruled in part, on other grounds by Oberg v. Honda Motor Co., 320 Or. 544 (1995)Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Kingsley v. United Rys. Co.

    66 Or. 50 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1913

    Consequently actual occupation or possession of real property is in its essential nature of an estate or right therein: Wilson v. Fine (D. C.), 38 Fed. 789 . … Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 , 115 Pac. 596 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or. 173 ( 96 Pac. 124 ); O. R. & N. Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 216 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ).

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Williamson v. McKenna

    223 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1960

    Brown v. Roach, 67 So2d 201 (Fla 1953); De Wald v. Quarnstrom, 60 So2d 919 (Fla 1952); Bexter v. Green, 55 So2d 548 (Fla 1951). See, Note, 4 Fla L Rev 79 (1951). … Jackson v. Jackson, 234 S C 291, 108 SE2d 86 (1959); Benton v. Pellum, 232 S C 26, 100 SE2d 534 (1957); Brown v. Hill, 228 S C 34, 88 SE2d 838 (1955).

    Superseded by statute, as recognized in State v. HillCited 71 timesPublished
  • Croasman v. Kincaid

    31 Or. 445 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1897

    E. 702 ); State v. Oliver, 116 Mo. 188 ( 22 S. W. 637 ); Wailes v. Smith, 76 Md. 469 ( 25 Atl. 922 ); Burton v. Furman, 115 N. C. 166 ( 20 S. E. 443 ); State v. Doyle, 38 Wis. 92 ; People v. … Board of Supervisors, 26 Barb. 118 ; Dechert v. Commonwealth, 113 Pa. St. 229 ( 6 Atl. 229 ); People v. Auditor, 2 Colo. 97 ; Spelling on Extraordinary Relief, § 1459.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cook v. Van Buskirk Et Ux.

    127 Or. 206 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1928

    Further, the rules generally applicable to chattel mortgages as to description are less rigid than those applied to conveyances of realty: Hardaway v. Jones, 100 Va. 481, 483 ( 41 S. E. 957 ); 11 C. J. 456, § 78. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Todd v. Pacific Ry. & Navigation Co.

    59 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1910

    Town of East Windsor, 63 Conn. 150 ( 27 Atl. 237 ); Elster v. Springfield, 49 Ohio St. 82 ( 30 N. E. 274 ) ; O. & R. V. R. Co. v. Martin, 14 Neb. 295 ( 15 N. W. 696 ); Larmore v. Crown Point Iron Co., 101 N. … Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11, 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); O. R. & N. Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 222 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Gallagher v. Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 ).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Coffey v. Smith

    52 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1908

    The right to assert and perfect a mechanic’s lien is a statutory privilege (Brown v. … Rowe, 19 Or. 188 ( 23 Pac. 901 ) ; Curtis v. Sestanovich, 26 Or. 107 ( 37 Pac. 67 ) ; Gordon v. Deal, 23 *541 Or. 153 ( 31 Pac. 287 ) ; Nicolai v. Van Fridagh, 23 Or. 149 ( 31 Pac. 288 ). By Section 5644, B. & C.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Loomis v. MacFarlane

    50 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1907

    Chief Justice Dixon, in Brown v. Hebard, 20 Wis. 344 ( 91 Am. Dec. 408 ), says: “It is not easy, perhaps, to" determine the precise application of this word as used in the statute. … Newcomb, 9 Cush. 46 ; McFadden v. Friendly, 9 Or. 222. 4. Upon the face of the instrument, then, it seems to us, the parties intended net profits when using the word “earnings.”

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Jennings v. Kiernan

    35 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1898

    Rep. 360 ), an appropriation by forest commissioners to be held as a forest preserve under an act of the legislature (Brown v. Allen, 57 Hun, 219 , 10 N. Y. … Brown, 106 N. C. 362 ( 10 S. E. 868 ); Williams v. Kerr, 113 N. C. 306 ( 18 S. E. 501 ).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Bauer v. Northwest Blowpipe Co.

    75 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1915

    C. 222 ; La Grande National Bank v. Blum, 27 Or. 215 ( 41 Pac. 659 ); McLeod v. Despain, 49 Or. 536, 552 ( 90 Pac. 492 , 92 Pac. 1088 , 124 Am. St. Rep. 1066 , 19 L. R. A. (N. S.) 276); Wehrung v. … Brown & McCabe, 53 Or. 598 ( 101 Pac. 671 ); Harding v. Oregon-Idaho Co., 57 Or. 34 ( 110 Pac. 412 ); Harrison v. Birrell, 58 Or. 410 ( 115 Pac. 141 ).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Hutton

    132 Or. 252 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1929

    Justice Brown, on behalf of the court, wrote: “While section 103, Or. … From Huntington v. Crouter, 38 Or. 408 ( 54 P. 208 , 72 Am. St.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Coalition for Safe Power v. Oregon Public Utility Commission

    325 Or. 447 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 18, 1997

    Petitioners Forelaws on Board (FOB) and Utility Reform Project (URP) appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Coalition for Safe Power v. PUC, 139 Or App 358 , 911 P2d 1272 (1996). … Relying on its own opinion in Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Varney

    244 Or. 583 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 26, 1966

    As in State v. Layne, 244 Or 510 , 419 P2d 35 (decided October 19, 1966), we decline to consider the question. … Gladden v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.