Case law

Salem Improvement Co. v. McCourt

26 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1894

In Van Rensaelar v. … In Taggart v.

State v. Milo

126 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1928

*240 BROWN, J. The defendant was jointly indicted with one J ames Kelly and a third person whose name was to the grand jury unknown and who is designated as “John Doe.” … To the same effect is Lockland v. State, 45 Tex. Cr. 87 ( 73 S. W. 1054 ). See, also, Myers v. Clearman, 125 Iowa, 461 ( 101 N. W. 193 ); Beach v. Hancock, 27 N. H. 223 ( 59 Am. Dec. 373 ); State v.

Ross v. County Court of Marion County

147 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1934

resulting from an office, trust, or station; but though the writ may require such court, corporation, board, officer, or person to exercise its or his judgment, or proceed to the discharge of any of its or his functions, … J. 575, § 49; State v. Plummer, 97 Or. 519 ( 189 P. 405 , 191 P. 883 ).

State v. Walton

53 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1909

State v. Salge, 2 Nev. 321 ; Shubert v. State, 21 Tex. App. 551 ( 2 S. W. 883 ); Wortham v. Commonwealth, 5 Randolph, 569. 6. … Ev. § 255; 2 Wigmore, Ev. § 1397; State v. Nelson, 68 Kan. 566 ( 75 Pac. 505 ); People v. Dowdigan, 67 Mich. 95 ( 38 N. W. 920 ); State v. Byers, 16 Mont. 565 ( 41 Pac. 708 ); Territory v.

State Ex Rel. Carson v. Hoss

134 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1930

*139 BROWN, J. For the reason that the ease was tried upon a stipulation of facts entered into by counsel for the parties hereto, at the outset we shall set out these facts at length. … “The following is a copy of that part of said circulated petition so filed with the secretary of state which corresponds to the petition originally filed and quoted in paragraph V hereof: “ ‘REFERENDUM PETITION “ ‘To Hal

Morgan v. Shaw

47 Or. 333 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1906

Fork of Burnt River flowed, and his title to the premises secured from the United States related back to the date of his settlement, that stream was not flowing through public lands when the defendant made his diversion: Brown … v.

State v. Young

140 Or. 228 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1932

BROWN, J. … The weight of the evidentiary circumstances relied on to corroborate the testimony of the accomplice is for the jury: State v. Brown, 113 Or. 149 ( 231 P. 926 ).

Errand v. Cascade Steel Rolling Mills, Inc.

320 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1995

Plaintiff did not seek judicial review of the Board’s order. … Dethlefs v.

Kelsey v. Norblad, Governor

136 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1930

The contemporaneous construction of a statute by those charged with its execution is entitled to weight: Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co., 133 Or. 468 ( 286 P. 527 , 291 P. 375 ); Portland v. … Welch, 126 Or. 293 ( 269 P. 868 ); *79 Spencer v. City of Portland, 114 Or. 381 ( 235 P. 279 ); Twohy Bros. Co. v. Ochoco Irrigation Dist., 108 Or. 1 ( 210 P. 873 , 216 P. 189 ).

Newport Terminals, Inc. v. Sunset Terminals, Inc.

279 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1977

Chicago Board of Trade v. United States, 246 US 231,238 (1918). … Moore, 275 Or 359, 364 , 551 P2d 431 (1976); Butler Enterprises v. Vanland-ingham, 264 Or 414, 427 , 505 P2d 1149 (1973); Lavey/Moore/Brown v.

Strandholm v. General Construction Co.

235 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

Browning et al, 1943, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599, 600 . … Neal v. Haight, 187 Or 13, 32 , 206 P2d 1197 ; Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599 ; Timmins v. Hale, 122 Or 24, 32 , 256 P 770 ; Spokane County v.

Wash. Cty. Pol. Officers v. Wash. Cty.

321 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1995

900 P.2d 483 (1995) 321 Or. 430 WASHINGTON COUNTY POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, Respondent on Review, v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, Petitioner on Review, and Employment Relations Board, Intervenor/Petitioner on Review. … The order of the Employment Relations Board is affirmed.

Devlin v. Moore

64 Or. 433 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1913

In Deadrick v. Bank, 100 Tenn. 457, 463 ( 45 S. … Rankin v. Cooper (C. C.), 149 Fed. 1010, 1013 . See, also, Campbell v. Watson, 62 N. J. Eq. 396 ( 50 Atl. 120 ). 13.

Re Application of Matthews

109 Or. 88 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1923

BROWN, J., Dissenting. — I dissent from that part of the opinion by our learned Chief Justice wherein he holds that the judgment imposing a jail sentence upon the defendant Matthews is void for uncertainty. … Also see list of authorities to like effect in Fuller v. State, supra.

Oregon Physicians' Service v. State Tax Commission

220 Or. 487 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1960

Paul v. … The Board of Tax Appeals reasoned that the New York law intended to provide a profit incentive for investors as a means of increasing the supply of housing. It indicated its disapproval of Garden Homes Co. v.

Ashley v. Williams

17 Or. 441 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1889

(Maupin v. Daniel, 3 Tenn. Ch. 223; Nims v. Nims, 1 South. L. Rev. 527; Marvin v. Hampton, 18 Fla. 131 .) *443 Ill this case the only evidence submitted by the plaintiff on this point are the books kept by himself. … one half of this sum is due him on this accounting at all events; but a reference to the evidence as well as the ledger will show that the plaintiff withdrew from the business $1,364.75, which he applied in payment of his board

Williamson v. McKenna

223 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1960

Brown v. Roach, 67 So2d 201 (Fla 1953); De Wald v. Quarnstrom, 60 So2d 919 (Fla 1952); Bexter v. Green, 55 So2d 548 (Fla 1951). See, Note, 4 Fla L Rev 79 (1951). … Jackson v. Jackson, 234 S C 291, 108 SE2d 86 (1959); Benton v. Pellum, 232 S C 26, 100 SE2d 534 (1957); Brown v. Hill, 228 S C 34, 88 SE2d 838 (1955).

O'Neill v. Eberhard Co.

99 Or. 686 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1921

Sargent, 66 Or. 384 ( 134 Pac. 7 ); Fields v. Western Union Tel. Co., 68 Or. 209 ( 137 Pac. 200 ); Smith v. Badura, 70 Or. 58 ( 139 Pac. 107 ); Gorman v. McGowan, 44 Or. 597 ( 76 Pac. 769 ); Miles v. … J., and Johns and Brown, JJ., concur.

Kingsley v. United Rys. Co.

66 Or. 50 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1913

Consequently actual occupation or possession of real property is in its essential nature of an estate or right therein: Wilson v. Fine (D. C.), 38 Fed. 789 . … Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 , 115 Pac. 596 ); Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); Sommer v. Compton, 52 Or. 173 ( 96 Pac. 124 ); O. R. & N. Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 216 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ).

Todd v. Pacific Ry. & Navigation Co.

59 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1910

Town of East Windsor, 63 Conn. 150 ( 27 Atl. 237 ); Elster v. Springfield, 49 Ohio St. 82 ( 30 N. E. 274 ) ; O. & R. V. R. Co. v. Martin, 14 Neb. 295 ( 15 N. W. 696 ); Larmore v. Crown Point Iron Co., 101 N. … Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11, 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); O. R. & N. Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 222 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Gallagher v. Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 ).