Case law

Rosenwald v. Oregon City Transp. Co.

84 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1917

Carson & Brown and Messrs. Dolph, Mallory, Simon & Gearin, for appellant. Mr. Abraham Nelson and Messrs. Westbrook & West-brook, for respondents. Department 1. Mr. Justice Benson delivered the opinion of the court. … Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 42 Or. 606 ( 72 Pac. 586 , 73 Pac. 341 ); McGregor v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 50 Or. 527 ( 93 Pac. 465 , 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 668); Lacey v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 63 Or. 596 ( 128 Pac. 999 ).

Steeples v. Newton

7 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1879

It was held in the case of Fenton v. … (Fuller v. Brown, 11 Mass. 440 , and Olmstead v. Beal, 19 Pick. 529 , above cited.) The latter rule is as it was announced by this court at this term, in the case of Tuboa & McPhee v. J. M.

Gilman v. Olson

125 Or. 1 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1928

This case, upon the point mentioned, is disposed of by authority of the case of Castro v. Hansen (Or.), 261 Pac. 428 . … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Associated Oil Co. v. Edgerton

158 Or. 607 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1938

Tolman, 12 Or. 289 , 7 P. 103 ; Morrill v. Morrill, 20 Or. 96 , 25 P. 362 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 95 , 11 L. R. A. 155; Belle v. Brown, 37 Or. 588 , 61 P. 1024 ; White v. Ladd, 41 Or. 324 , 68 P. 739 , 93 Am. St. … See First National Bank of Burns v. Buckland, 130 Or. 364, 371, 372 ( 280 P. 331 ), and the authorities there cited. Again, as said in Abel v.

Lesser v. Great Lakes Casualty Co.

171 Or. 174 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 3, 1943

Doyle, was employed as a nnrse by the Wiswall Sanatorium at a wage of $40 a month and her maintenance, that is her board and room. … In Putnam v.

Bowles v. Gantenbein

83 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1917

Justice Brown remarks: “We think that the plaintiff’s claim to have the God-help rent paid to them is well founded. … Thus in Bredell v. Fair Grounds Real Estate Co., 95 Mo. App. 676 ( 69 S. W. 635 ), a receiver having been appointed a like conclusion was reached as in the preceding case. So too in Riggs v. Whitney, 15 Abb. Pr. (N.

Ashley v. Williams

17 Or. 441 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 9, 1889

(Maupin v. Daniel, 3 Tenn. Ch. 223; Nims v. Nims, 1 South. L. Rev. 527; Marvin v. Hampton, 18 Fla. 131 .) *443 Ill this case the only evidence submitted by the plaintiff on this point are the books kept by himself. … one half of this sum is due him on this accounting at all events; but a reference to the evidence as well as the ledger will show that the plaintiff withdrew from the business $1,364.75, which he applied in payment of his board

Ross v. County Court of Marion County

147 Or. 695 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1934

resulting from an office, trust, or station; but though the writ may require such court, corporation, board, officer, or person to exercise its or his judgment, or proceed to the discharge of any of its or his functions, … J. 575, § 49; State v. Plummer, 97 Or. 519 ( 189 P. 405 , 191 P. 883 ).

State v. Milo

126 Or. 238 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1928

*240 BROWN, J. The defendant was jointly indicted with one J ames Kelly and a third person whose name was to the grand jury unknown and who is designated as “John Doe.” … To the same effect is Lockland v. State, 45 Tex. Cr. 87 ( 73 S. W. 1054 ). See, also, Myers v. Clearman, 125 Iowa, 461 ( 101 N. W. 193 ); Beach v. Hancock, 27 N. H. 223 ( 59 Am. Dec. 373 ); State v.

State v. Walton

53 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1909

State v. Salge, 2 Nev. 321 ; Shubert v. State, 21 Tex. App. 551 ( 2 S. W. 883 ); Wortham v. Commonwealth, 5 Randolph, 569. 6. … Ev. § 255; 2 Wigmore, Ev. § 1397; State v. Nelson, 68 Kan. 566 ( 75 Pac. 505 ); People v. Dowdigan, 67 Mich. 95 ( 38 N. W. 920 ); State v. Byers, 16 Mont. 565 ( 41 Pac. 708 ); Territory v.

Wright v. Phillips

127 Or. 420 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1928

S.) 823, 826); Thayer v. McGee, 20 Mich. 195, 205 ; Woodsville Fire Dist. v. Stahl, 80 N. H. 502 ( 119 Atl. 123 , 27 A. L. R. 1144, 1145); Stevens v. Stevens, 304 Ill. 297 ( 136 N. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Bertin & Lepori v. Mattison

69 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1914

Cas. 219); Thompson v. Greenwood, 28 Ind. 327 ; Bond v. Wagner, 28 Ind. 462 ; Gardner v. Clark, 21 N. Y. 401 ; Little v. Harrington, 71 Mo. 390 ; Ware v. … Hamilton Brown Shoe Co., 92 Ala. 145 ( 9 South. 136 ); Rock Island Plow Co. v. Peterson, 93 Minn. 356 ( 101 N. W. 616 ); 19 Cyc. 1272; Havens etc. Co. v. Diamond, 93 Ill. App. 557 .

Todd v. Pacific Ry. & Navigation Co.

59 Or. 249 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1910

Town of East Windsor, 63 Conn. 150 ( 27 Atl. 237 ); Elster v. Springfield, 49 Ohio St. 82 ( 30 N. E. 274 ) ; O. & R. V. R. Co. v. Martin, 14 Neb. 295 ( 15 N. W. 696 ); Larmore v. Crown Point Iron Co., 101 N. … Browning v. Lewis, 39 Or. 11, 17 ( 64 Pac. 304 ); O. R. & N. Co. v. Hertzberg, 26 Or. 222 ( 37 Pac. 1019 ); Gallagher v. Kelliher, 58 Or. 557 ( 114 Pac. 943 ).

White v. Gordon

130 Or. 139 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1929

We are not concerned with any restrictions or limitations put upon her authority by the *143 principal, of which the plaintiff had no notice: Thomas v. Smith-Wagoner Co., 114 Or. 69 ( 234 Pac. 814 ). … Brown, J., absent.

Strandholm v. General Construction Co.

235 Or. 145 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1963

Browning et al, 1943, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599, 600 . … Neal v. Haight, 187 Or 13, 32 , 206 P2d 1197 ; Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or 350, 354 , 133 P2d 599 ; Timmins v. Hale, 122 Or 24, 32 , 256 P 770 ; Spokane County v.

State v. Edy

117 Or. 430 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1926

L., p. 1347, Form 7; State v. Knighten, 39 Or. 63 ( 64 Pac. 866 , 87 Am. St. Bep. 647); State v. Sullivan, 68 Vt. 540 ( 35 Atl. 479 ). 2. … This statement, however, is based upon the case of Young v.

Salem Improvement Co. v. McCourt

26 Or. 93 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1894

In Van Rensaelar v. … In Taggart v.

Barrett v. Schleich

37 Or. 613 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1900

Morin, 5 Or. 96 ; Whiteaker v. Vanschoiack, 5 Or. 113 ; Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Wagonblast v. Whitney, 12 Or. 83 ( 6 Pac. 399 ); Cooper v. Thomason, 30 Or. 161 ( 45 Pac. 296 ). … "While it is true that a contract for the sale of land of which a coux-t of equity is justified in decreeing a specific performance must be certain and defined (Odell v.

State Ex Rel. Carson v. Hoss

134 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1930

*139 BROWN, J. For the reason that the ease was tried upon a stipulation of facts entered into by counsel for the parties hereto, at the outset we shall set out these facts at length. … “The following is a copy of that part of said circulated petition so filed with the secretary of state which corresponds to the petition originally filed and quoted in paragraph V hereof: “ ‘REFERENDUM PETITION “ ‘To Hal

Meridianal Co. v. Moeck

121 Or. 133 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1927

J., § 569, p. 1099; Marshall v. Marshall, 98 Or. 500 ( 194 Pac. 425 ); Davis v. Davis, 20 Or. 84 ( 25 Pac. 140 ). … J., and McBride and Brown, JJ., concur.