Case law

Rosenwald v. Oregon City Transp. Co.

84 Or. 15 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1917

Carson & Brown and Messrs. Dolph, Mallory, Simon & Gearin, for appellant. Mr. Abraham Nelson and Messrs. Westbrook & West-brook, for respondents. Department 1. Mr. Justice Benson delivered the opinion of the court. … Co. v. First Nat. Bank, 42 Or. 606 ( 72 Pac. 586 , 73 Pac. 341 ); McGregor v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 50 Or. 527 ( 93 Pac. 465 , 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 668); Lacey v. Oregon R. & Nav. Co., 63 Or. 596 ( 128 Pac. 999 ).

Nicklas v. Rathburn

69 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1914

In the case of Darst v. People, 51 Ill. 286 ( 2 Am. … In Gear v.

Anthony v. Hillsboro Gold Mining Co.

58 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1911

court as its findings, and that a decree was rendered thereon, does not render the decree void, and as the suit is tried anew in this court, the ruling of the lower court in regard thereto is not reversible error: Sutherlin v. … The only circumstance testified to, tending to establish an estoppel, is to the effect that, at the board meeting on November 20, 1903, while a settlement was under consideration between plaintiff and defendant, plaintiff

Christianson v. Muller

193 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1952

Walker v. Penner, 190 Or. 542, 551 , 227 P. 2d 316 ; Lynn v. Stinnette, 147 Or. 105 , 31 P. 2d 764 . … As was said in Lyons v.

Rogers v. Donovan

268 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1974

In Goodman v. … Brown, 124 Colo 52, 234 P2d 618, 619 (1951); Aircraft Radio Industries, Inc. v. M. V. Palmer, Inc., 45 Wash 2d 737, 277 P2d 737, 740-41 (1954); Jeffords v. Albemarle Waterworks, 157 NC 10, 72 SE 624 (1911).

Noll v. Carlin

101 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1921

BROWN, J., Dissenting. — I dissent from the statement contained in the prevailing opinion that defendant’s exhibit I, being a letter from plaintiff’s wife to her relatives, bearing date October 17, 1917, was admissible. … To like effect see State v. Smith, 43 Or. 109, 110 ( 71 Pac. 973 ); Worth v. Richter, 63 Or. 114, 116 ( 126 Pac. 987 ); Service Lbr. Co. v. Sumpter Val. Ry. Co. 67 Or. 63, 80 ( 135 Pac. 539 ); Hillsboro Nat. Rank v.

Amacher v. Western Realty Corp.

148 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1934

This action of the board of directors was a nullity. … It occurred at a time when the corporation was insolvent and two of the three directors were personally and vitally interested in the action attempted to be taken by the board: Rugger v. Mt.

Patterson v. Babcock Peets

128 Or. 476 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1929

A motion to elect is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless an abuse of discretion appears: Harvey v. Southern Pac. Co., 46 Or. 505, 512 ( 80 Pac. 1061 ); Johnson v. … Brown and Belt, JJ., concur. Rossman, J., dissents.

Ruble v. Kirkwood

125 Or. 316 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1928

Morrison, 80 Or. 240 ( 156 Pac. 429 ); Davis v. Sladden, 17 Or. 259 ( 21 Pac. 140 ). … Bean and Brown, JJ., concur. Rand, C. J., concurs in the result.

Barrett v. Schleich

37 Or. 613 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1900

Morin, 5 Or. 96 ; Whiteaker v. Vanschoiack, 5 Or. 113 ; Brown v. Lord, 7 Or. 302 ; Wagonblast v. Whitney, 12 Or. 83 ( 6 Pac. 399 ); Cooper v. Thomason, 30 Or. 161 ( 45 Pac. 296 ). … "While it is true that a contract for the sale of land of which a coux-t of equity is justified in decreeing a specific performance must be certain and defined (Odell v.

Portland Mortgage Co. v. Creditors Protective Ass'n

199 Or. 432 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1953

Brown v. Crawford, 252 F 248; Coughanour v. Hutchinson, 41 Or 419 , 69 P 68 . … Renard v. Brown, 7 Neb 449; Smith v. Shay, 62 Iowa 119 , 17 NW 444 ; O’Brien v. Perkins, Tex Civ App, 276 SW *444 308; Shelton v. O’Brien, Tex, 285 SW 260 .

Wilk v. Georges

267 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1973

In Dawson v. Payless for Drugs, supra, and Bertrand v. … Smith v. Portland Traction Co., 220 Or 215 , 349 P2d 286 (1960); Robertson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 195 Or 668 , 247 P2d 217 (1952). Reversed and remanded.

Stowell v. Hall

56 Or. 256 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1910

Rep. 364 ), and Friedenthal v. Brown, 52 Or. 33 ( 95 Pac. 1114 .) … In Davis v.

State v. Plummer

97 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 20, 1920

The appeal to the board of appeals and finally to the council is admitted, with the result as stated in the alternative writ. Other admissions and denials were made, not necessary to be noticed here. … Moores, 36 Or. 261 ( 59 Pac. 327 ); State ex rel. v. Grand Jury, 37 Or. 542 ( 62 Pac. 208 ); State ex rel. v. Fields, 53 Or. 453 ( 101 Pac. 218 ); State ex rel. v. Webster, 58 Or. 376 ( 114 Pac. 932 ).

Schmalz v. Arnwine

118 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 4, 1926

BROWN, J. This is a civil action prosecuted by an attorney at law, who is seeking to recover compensation for professional services rendered to the defendant. … Such affidavits will not be received for that purpose: State v. Smith, 43 Or. 118 ( 71 Pac. 973 ). The record before us fails to disclose prejudicial error; therefore, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Broughton's Estate v. Central Oregon Irrigation District

165 Or. 435 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1940

The supreme court of Idaho, in Speer v. … In United States v.

Wiggins v. Wiggins

174 Or. 181 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1944

Neely v. Neely, 162 Or. 610 , 94 P. (2d) 300 ; Steele v. Steele, 96 Or. 630 , 190 P. 716 . The plaintiff not only told her husband that she does not love him, but demonstrated that fact by her actions. … Kaller v. Spady, 144 Or. 206 , 10 P. (2d) 1119 , 24 P. (2d) 351 .

State v. Mason

29 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1896

Forgery — Alexander v. Alexander, 9 Wend. 140 . Fornication — Pollard v. Lyon, 91 U. S. 225 . Keeping a Bawdy-house — Martin v. Stillwell, 13 Johns. 274 ( 7 Am. Dec. 374 ). Larceny — Redway v. … White, 1 Dev. and B. 471; Birch v. Benton, 26 Mo. 153 . In Parkersburg v. Brown, 106 U. S. 487 , (1 Sup. Ct. 442,) Mr.

Olson v. Heisen

90 Or. 176 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1918

Brown, 24 N. J. Law, 80; Van Horn v. State, 46 Neb. 62 ( 64 N. W. 365 ); Fayetteville Farmers’ Bank v. Hale, 59 N. Y. 53 ; Campbell v. Jackman Bros., 140 Iowa, 475 ( 118 N. W. 755 , 27 L. R. A. (N. … The judgment appealed from will be modified by eliminating the attorney’s fee mentioned in the judgment; but on the authority of Stabler v.

In Re Frank Victor Patterson for Admission to the Bar

210 Or. 495 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1957

In United States v. … Justice O’Halloran in Martin v.