Case law

Wilk v. Georges

267 Or. 19 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 4, 1973

In Dawson v. Payless for Drugs, supra, and Bertrand v. … Smith v. Portland Traction Co., 220 Or 215 , 349 P2d 286 (1960); Robertson v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 195 Or 668 , 247 P2d 217 (1952). Reversed and remanded.

Anthony v. Hillsboro Gold Mining Co.

58 Or. 258 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 1911

court as its findings, and that a decree was rendered thereon, does not render the decree void, and as the suit is tried anew in this court, the ruling of the lower court in regard thereto is not reversible error: Sutherlin v. … The only circumstance testified to, tending to establish an estoppel, is to the effect that, at the board meeting on November 20, 1903, while a settlement was under consideration between plaintiff and defendant, plaintiff

Pacific Westbound Conference v. Leval & Co.

201 Or. 390 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1954

The memorandum of agreement which bound the various carriers together into the Pacific Westbound Conference was made and entered into on the 8th day of January, 1923, and duly approved by the Maritime Board (now existing … "We are impressed with the reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in the case of Isbrandtsen Company, Inc. v. *396 United States of America and Federal Maritime Board, et al.,

WARNER v. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines

221 Or. 544 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 11, 1960

Cox v. Sanitarium Co., 181 Or 572, 582 , 184 P2d 386 . No evidence whatever was offered thereon. … Lewis v. Nichols, 164 Or 555 , 103 P2d 284 . The affidavit of the juror, if proper, is of no help here.

Kliks v. Dalles City

216 Or. 160 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1959

Mitchell v. City of Mobile, 244 Ala 442, 13 So2d 664 (1943); Chicopee Mfg. Co. v. Manchester Board of Water Commissioners, 97 NH 109, 81 A2d 837 (1951); Re City of Bozeman, 18 PUR3d 180 (1957). … Gardner v.

Wadhams & Co. v. San Francisco & PortLand S. S. Co.

80 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 4, 1916

L., reads thus: *66 “It may be issued to any inferior court, corporation, board, officer, or person, to compel the performance of an act which the law specially enjoins, as a duty resulting from an office, trust, or station … Although mandamus was held to be a suitable remedy in Haugen v. Albina Light & Water Co., 21 Or. 411 ( 28 Pac. 244 , 14 L. R. A. 424), and Mackin v. Portland Gas Co., 38 Or. 120 ( 61 Pac. 134 , 62 Pac. 20 , 49 L. R.

Christianson v. Muller

193 Or. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1952

Walker v. Penner, 190 Or. 542, 551 , 227 P. 2d 316 ; Lynn v. Stinnette, 147 Or. 105 , 31 P. 2d 764 . … As was said in Lyons v.

Rogers v. Donovan

268 Or. 24 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1974

In Goodman v. … Brown, 124 Colo 52, 234 P2d 618, 619 (1951); Aircraft Radio Industries, Inc. v. M. V. Palmer, Inc., 45 Wash 2d 737, 277 P2d 737, 740-41 (1954); Jeffords v. Albemarle Waterworks, 157 NC 10, 72 SE 624 (1911).

Ramp v. McDaniel

12 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1885

In McGowan v. … Thus, in Brown v.

Dentel v. Fidelity Savings and Loan Association

273 Or. 31 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1975

The bylaws provide the members, shall elect the Board of Directors. … The board had previously secured the approval of the corporation commissioner to the amendment.

Noll v. Carlin

101 Or. 203 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1921

BROWN, J., Dissenting. — I dissent from the statement contained in the prevailing opinion that defendant’s exhibit I, being a letter from plaintiff’s wife to her relatives, bearing date October 17, 1917, was admissible. … To like effect see State v. Smith, 43 Or. 109, 110 ( 71 Pac. 973 ); Worth v. Richter, 63 Or. 114, 116 ( 126 Pac. 987 ); Service Lbr. Co. v. Sumpter Val. Ry. Co. 67 Or. 63, 80 ( 135 Pac. 539 ); Hillsboro Nat. Rank v.

Chamberlain v. Hibbard

26 Or. 428 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1894

It is not necessary that the claim filed with the county clerk should contain an itemized account of the demand: Ainslie v. Kohn, 16 Or. 363 , 19 Pac. 97 ; Curtis v. Sestanovich, 26 Or. 107 , 37 Pac. 67 . … The defendant’s right to have the alterations valued by arbitrators was one which he could waive, and by pleading to the merits he waived the matter in abatement: Winter v. Norton, 1 Or. 43 ; Hopwood v.

In Re Frank Victor Patterson for Admission to the Bar

210 Or. 495 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 17, 1957

In United States v. … Justice O’Halloran in Martin v.

State v. Olmstead

310 Or. 455 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1990

It reasoned: “[State v.] … State v. *462 Miller, 309 Or 362, 371 , 788 P2d 974 (1990) (DUII); State v. Buttrey, 293 Or 575, 586 , 651 P2d 1075 (1982) (DWS). State v.

Omdahl v. Omark Industries, Inc.

259 Or. 496 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1971

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OP OPTIONS “Stock options granted pursuant to the Plan shall be authorized by the Board of Directors and shall be evidenced by agreements in such form as the Committee shall from time to time recommend … The judgment is affirmed. ① Fields v. Western Equipment Co., 255 Or 615 , 469 P2d 779 (1970).

Watkins v. Ackley

370 Or. 604 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2022

Petitioner’s appeal was certified to the Supreme Court under ORS 19.405, along with two other similar cases, Huggett v. Kelly, (A174444)(S068823), and Jones v. Brown, (A175780)(S068824). … And she points to the Court’s decision in Brown v. Louisiana, 447 US 323, 100 S Ct 2214, 65 L Ed 2d 159 (1980), regarding the retroactivity of the rule announced in Burch v.

Town of La Fayette v. Clark

9 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

(Kerrigan v. Force, 68 N. Y., 383 ; The People v. Supervisors, 43 N. Y., 10 ; Wheeler v. Philadelphia, 77 Penn. St., 348; The People v. Cooper, 83 Ill., 589 .) … (The Schooner Constitution v. Woodworth, 1 Seam., 512.) In United States v. Wonson, 1 Gal., 5, Mr.

DeLong v. Yu Enterprises, Inc.

334 Or. 166 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 2002

See Grubb v. … of Funeral Directors and Embalmers, when that board was sitting in its quasi-judicial function as licensing body, was subject to absolute privilege); Ramstead v.

Massor v. Yates

137 Or. 569 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1931

E. 126 ); Nash v. Webber, 204 Mass. 419 ( 90 N. E. 872 ). … Kelly, Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur.

Crawford v. O'Connell

39 Or. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

v. … Hogle, 30 Ill. 119 ; Page v. Webster, 8 Mich. 263 ( 77 Am. Dec. 446 ); Butler v. Porter, 13 Mich. 292 ; Cooley v. Waterman, 16 Mich. 366 ; Maul v. Rider, 51 Pa. 377 ; State ex rel. v.