Case law

Hanna v. Hope

86 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1917

Jonas Schwab Company, 138 Ala. 664 ( 35 South. 649 ); Cassell v. Lowry, 164 Ind. 1 ( 72 N. E. 640 ); Newaygo County Mfg. Co. v. Stevens, 79 Mich. 398, 406 ( 44 N. W. 852 ); Switz v. Black, 45 Iowa, 597 . … Ed. 515 ); Ayers v. Chicago, 101 U. S. 184, 187 ( 25 L. Ed. 838 ); Stonemetz Printers’ Mach. Co. v. Brown Folding Mach. Co., 46 Fed. 851 -853; Johnson Railroad Signal Co. v. Union Switch etc.

Town of La Fayette v. Clark

9 Or. 225 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1881

(Kerrigan v. Force, 68 N. Y., 383 ; The People v. Supervisors, 43 N. Y., 10 ; Wheeler v. Philadelphia, 77 Penn. St., 348; The People v. Cooper, 83 Ill., 589 .) … (The Schooner Constitution v. Woodworth, 1 Seam., 512.) In United States v. Wonson, 1 Gal., 5, Mr.

Schiffmann v. Youmans

95 Or. 511 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1920

Whatever may be the rule in other jurisdictions, the case of Roots v. Boring Junction Lbr. … As shown by Love v. Morrill, 19 Or. 545 ( 24 Pac. 916 ), and Andrews v.

Hall v. Pierce

210 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1957

Shely v. Votaw (Ky), 272 SW2d 462 ; MacNeill v. Maddox, 194 Gra 802, 22 SE2d 653 . Such a motion was denied, however, in Alamo Motor Lines v. … Lyon v.

Wuchter v. Fitzgerald

83 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1917

You are not to consider what the plaintiff had to pay for board or what he had to pay for powder, but whatever the work was reasonably worth without regard to the contract price.” … J. 1411; Cozad v. Elam, 115 Mo. App. 136 ( 91 S. W. 434 ); Reifschneider v. Beck, 148 Mo. App. 725 ( 129 S. W. 232 ); Edward Thompson Co. v. Kollmeyer, 46 Ind. App. 400 ( 92 N. E. 660 ); Massey v.

Booth's Will

40 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901

Loomis, 51 Barb. 257 ; Lathrop v. Dunlop, 4 Hun, 213 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; In re Kaufman, 131 N. Y. 620 ( 30 N. E. 242 , 15 *159 L. R. A. 292 * ); In re McLarney’s Will, 153 N. Y. 416 ( 47 N. E. 817 , 60 Am. … Rep. 664 ; Swan v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 45 ( 52 Am. Rep. 255 ); In re Fransen’s Will, 26 Pa. 202 ; In re Craft’s Estate, 164 Pa. 520 ( 30 Atl. 493 ); Appeal of Martin, 1 64 Pa. St. 520. In Brown v. Clark, 77 N.

Bryant v. Seagraves

270 Or. 16 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1974

Bryant’s expert testified that a cruise he conducted shortly before trial indicated that approximately 465,000 board feet were then standing on the property. … Jones, 258 Or 468 , 483 P2d 815 (1971); Hammons v. Schrunk, 209 Or 127 , 305 P2d 405 (1956); Milton v.

Weyerhaeuser Timber Co. v. State Tax Commission

223 Or. 280 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1960

Thus timber which might sell for $20 per thousand board feet, when reduced to “wholesale value” by the depletion factor of .30, becomes taxable on a basis of $6 per thousand board feet, not because it is worth only $6, but … Board etc., 85 Or 434, 443 , 165 P 1164 : “* * * To a large extent an assessment depends upon one’s judgment.

State v. Hancock

247 Or. 21 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1967

The hospital disposition board concluded that he was able to assist in his own defense and he was returned to the Multnomah County Jail to await trial. … United States, 249 F2d 32 (1957); People v. Falls, 150 Cal App2d 554, 310 P2d 484 (1957); State v. Cofer, 73 Ida 181, 249 P2d 197 (1952); State v.

Matter of Compensation of Bracke

293 Or. 239 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 22, 1982

The Court of Appeals reversed the Board’s order. … For examples, see, Cutright v. Amer. Ship *246 Dismantler, supra, and Smith v. Ed’s Pancake House, 27 Or App 361 , 556 P2d 158 (1976). In Davidson Baking v. Ind.

In Re Moynihan

166 Or. 200 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1941

Thereafter .exceptions were filed by the accused with the Board of Governors, accompanied by a brief. … One of the elements of the offense of perjury is that the statements made under oath were material to the inquiry: State v. Walton, 53 Or. 557 , 99 P. 431 , 101 P. 389 , 102 P. 173 .

Hogan v. Mason Motor Co.

133 Or. 14 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1930

BROWN, J. The history of the car forming the subject-matter of this litigation is an eventful one. … See Collins v. United Brokers Co., 99 Or. 556 ( 194 P. 458 ); Carty v. McMenamin & Ward, 108 Or. 489 ( 216 P. 228 ). See also Johnson v. Hoffman, 132 Or. 46 ( 284 P. 567 ).

State v. Edlund

81 Or. 614 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1916

This definition is approved in State v. Roberts, 15 Or. 187, 197 ( 13 Pac. 896 ), and cited as an authority in State v. Carr, 28 Or. 389, 396 ( 42 Pac. 215 ). In 1 R. C. … Gulley, 41 Or. 318 ( 70 Pac. 385 ); State v. Brown, 73 Or. 325 ( 144 Pac. 444 ). In State v. Gear, 72 Or. 501 ( 143 Pac. 890 ), Mr.

Casto v. Hansen

123 Or. 20 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1927

W. 999 ; Brown v. Chambers, 65 Pa. St. 373. Ordinarily, whether due care was exercised in this regard would be a question of fact for the jury. … The above instruction given verbatim, was approved by this court in Johnson v. Underwood et al., *27 102 Or. 680 ( 203 Pac. 879 ). It was also given and approved in Barnes v. Barnett, 184 Iowa, 936 ( 169 N.

Mitchell v. State Accident Insurance Fund

290 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1981

The Workers’ Compensation Board found to the contrary. … The Court of Appeals reversed in a Per Curiam opinion, citing James v. SAIF, 44 Or App 520 , 605 P2d 1391 (1980). We remand for the Court of Appeals to proceed in accordance with our opinion in James v.

Hays v. Pigg

267 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1973

Brown v. Farrell, 258 Or 348, 358 , 483 P2d 453 (1971); Mercer Steel Co. v. Park Construction Co., 242 Or 596, 599-600 , 411 P2d 262 (1966); Boyer v. … Smith v. Lichtenthaler, 206 Or 584, 586 , 294 P2d 334 (1956); Anderson v. Chambliss, 199 Or 400, 414 , 262 P2d 298 (1953). The reason for the rule is stated in Benj. Franklin S&L v.

Sherman v. Bellows

24 Or. 553 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1893

Co. 20 Minn. 48 ; Willard v. Comstock, 58 Wis. 565 ( 46 Am. Rep. 657 ; 17 N. W. 401 ); New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Dann, 51 Ala. 134 ; Springfield v. Edwards, 84 Ill. 627 . … of Liquidation v.

Ingalls v. Isensee

170 Or. 393 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1943

Brown & McCabe, 128 Or. 286, 291 , 274 P. 505 ; Blue v. City of Union, 159 Or. 5, 19 , 75 P. (2d) 977 . “The reason for this rule”, the court stated in Ferguson v. … The defendant relies on Wallace v.

Lampa v. Hakola

152 Or. 626 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1936

L. 1019; Patterson v. Howe, 102 Or. 275, 284 ( 202 P. 225 ); Cass v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co., (S. D.) 253 N. W. 626 ); Meyer v. Johnson, 224 Mo. App. 565 ( 30 S. W. (2d) 641 ); Willis v. City of Browning, 161 Mo. … W. 516 ); Butez v. Fonda, etc. R. Co., 45 N. Y. Supp. 808 ; Stewart v. Weiner, 108 Neb. 49 ( 187 N. W. 121 ); Vance v. Monroe Drug Co., 149 Ill. App. 499 ; Felsch v. Babb, 72 Neb. 736 ( 101 N.

Bean v. Hostettler

182 Or. 510 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1948

Lyons v. Browning, 170 Or. 350, 353 , 133 P. (2d) 599 ; Arthur v. Parish, 150 Or. 582, 588 , 47 P. (2d) 682 ; Cicrich v. State Industrial Accident Com., 143 Or. 627, 636 , 23 P. (2d) 534 ; Timmins v. … See the previously cited cases of Cicrich v. State Industrial Accident Com.; Timmins v. Hale; American National Bank v. Kerley; Spokane County v. Pacific Bridge Co.; Bottig v. Polsky.