Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersor

8,515 results

0.70s

  • Klovdahl v. Springfield

    81 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1916

    Co., 64 Or. 1 ( 128 Pac. 989); Equi v. Olcott, 66 Or. 213 ( 133 Pac. 775 ); Purdin v. Hancock, 67 Or. 164 ( 135 Pac. 515 ); Barnard v. Houser, 68 Or. 240 ( 137 Pac. 227 ); Templeton v. … Gordon, 6 Or. 175 ; House v. Jackson, 24 Or. 89 ( 32 Pac. 1027 ); Hayden v. Brown, 33 Or. 221 ( 53 Pac. 490 ); Bogard v. Barhan, 52 Or. 121 ( 96 Pac. 673 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 676 ); St. Dennis v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Fisk v. Leith

    137 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1931

    No. 7 v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur. *466 Former opinion modified on rehearing October 6, 1931

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Larkins v. Richardson

    263 Or. 444 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972

    In Brown v. Grimm, 258 Or 55, 59-60 , 481 P2d 63 (1971), and Setser v. … The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. (1) Bliss v. Carter, 26 Mich App 177 , 182 NW2d 54 (1970); Funke v. Paist, 356 Pa 594, 52 A2d 655 (1947); Richardson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Williamson

    307 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

    See State v. Wolfe, 295 Or 567, 571 , 669 P2d 320 (1983); State v. Kennedy, supra, 290 Or at 502 . … See State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 278 n 6, 721 P2d 1357 (1986).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Savage Adm'x v. Palmer

    204 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1955

    Seotchlight signs were described as signs which have a metal on the face of the board which reflects light through the paint so that an approaching car can see the sign. … . *273 Defendant relies upon Hall v. Brown, 102 Or 389 , 202 P 719 ; Ragan v. MacGill, 134 Or 408 , 292 P 1094 ; Barnes v. Davidson, 190 Or 508 , 266 P2d 289 ; Adkins v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Myers v. Hatler

    121 Or. 332 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1927

    M. 403 ( 94 Pac. 1014 ); Johnson v. Williams, 51 N. Y. St. 805 ( 22 N. Y. Supp. 247 ); Ray v. Pease, 95 Ga. 153 ( 22 S. E. 190 ); Thompson on Real Property, § 3081. As stated in Cornett v. Creech et al., 30 Ky. … J., and Brown and Coshow, JJ., concur.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Bramwell

    146 Or. 611 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1934

    E. 452 ); Curtiss *616 et al. v. Wilmarth et al., 254 Mich. 242 ( 236 N. W. 773 ); Niles v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., 176 N. Y. 119 ( 68 N. E. 142 ); Lukach v. Blair, 108 Misc. 20 (178 N. Y. … Brock v. Poor, 216 N. Y. 387 ( 111 N.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Livesley v. Krebs Hop Co.

    57 Or. 352 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1910

    In Cooper v. … To the same effect is People v. Cook Circuit Court, 169 Ill. 201 ( 48 N. E. 717 ) ; Kent v. Mahaffy, 2 Ohio St. 498 ; Yeoman v. Lasley, 86 Ohio St. 416 ; Wagner v. Railway Co., 38 Ohio St. 32 ; Leech v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • State v. Portland

    65 Or. 273 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 28, 1913

    , and the other boards, officers and commissions theretofore existing. … It is true that in McKeon v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Spencer v. City of Portland

    114 Or. 381 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1925

    A. 115) ; McQuaid v. Portland & V. Ry. Co., 18 Or. 237 ( 22 Pac. 899 ); Kelly v. Multnomah County, 18 Or. 356 ( 22 Pac. 1110 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid, 31 Or. 379 ( 49 Pac. 758 ). … And,.in a case of doubt, it ought to turn the scale: Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 571 ( 28 L. Ed. 1080 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hanna v. Hope

    86 Or. 303 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 13, 1917

    Jonas Schwab Company, 138 Ala. 664 ( 35 South. 649 ); Cassell v. Lowry, 164 Ind. 1 ( 72 N. E. 640 ); Newaygo County Mfg. Co. v. Stevens, 79 Mich. 398, 406 ( 44 N. W. 852 ); Switz v. Black, 45 Iowa, 597 . … Ed. 515 ); Ayers v. Chicago, 101 U. S. 184, 187 ( 25 L. Ed. 838 ); Stonemetz Printers’ Mach. Co. v. Brown Folding Mach. Co., 46 Fed. 851 -853; Johnson Railroad Signal Co. v. Union Switch etc.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Coston v. Portland Trust Co.

    131 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1929

    The New York courts have confined the application of this statute to transfers of personalty: Sloan v. Birdsall , 58 Hun, 317 ( 11 N.Y. Supp. 814 ); Brown v. Guthrie , 39 Hun, *Page 94 29; Knapp v. … Brown , 252 Mo. 58 ( 158 S.W. 624 ); Keck v. McKinstry , 206 Iowa 1121 ( 221 N.W. 851 ); Roche v. Brickley , 254 Mass. 584 ( 150 N.E. 866 ); MacKernan v. Fox , 220 Mass. 197 ( 107 N.E. 919 ); Lines v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Barrett v. Barrett

    5 Or. 411 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1875

    In the case of Livermore v. … Nary (41 Vermont, 180), and Barber v. Barber (21 How. U. S. 582), are cited. In the case of Nary v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Van Natta v. Nys & Erickson

    203 Or. 204 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1954

    . * * ” Brown v. Kemp, 46 Or 517 , 81 P 236 . See also, Rose v. Denn, 188 Or 1 , 212 P2d 1077 , 213 P2d 810 . … In Brown v. Kemp, supra, the road over which it was held that the owners of the dominant tenement had an easement of way by necessity was in existence at the time of their grants. Cullison v.

    Overruled on other grounds by Garza v. Grayson, 255 Or. 413 (1970)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Mikolich v. State Industrial Accident Commission

    212 Or. 36 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1957

    In Ek v. … Carlson v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Torrey & Dean, Inc. v. Coyle

    138 Or. 509 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1932

    I. 302 ( 127 Atl. 359 ); French v. Love, (Tex. Civ. App.) 281 S. W. 301 ; Harvey v. Sehrt, 12 La. App. 583 ( 126 So. 568 ); Harris v. McPherson, 97 Conn. 164 ( 115 Atl. 723 , 24 A. L. … J., and Brown, J., concur. Campbell, J., concurs in the result.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Booth's Will

    40 Or. 154 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1901

    Loomis, 51 Barb. 257 ; Lathrop v. Dunlop, 4 Hun, 213 ; Brown v. Clark, 77 N. Y. 369 ; In re Kaufman, 131 N. Y. 620 ( 30 N. E. 242 , 15 *159 L. R. A. 292 * ); In re McLarney’s Will, 153 N. Y. 416 ( 47 N. E. 817 , 60 Am. … Rep. 664 ; Swan v. Hammond, 138 Mass. 45 ( 52 Am. Rep. 255 ); In re Fransen’s Will, 26 Pa. 202 ; In re Craft’s Estate, 164 Pa. 520 ( 30 Atl. 493 ); Appeal of Martin, 1 64 Pa. St. 520. In Brown v. Clark, 77 N.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Hall v. Pierce

    210 Or. 98 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1957

    Shely v. Votaw (Ky), 272 SW2d 462 ; MacNeill v. Maddox, 194 Gra 802, 22 SE2d 653 . Such a motion was denied, however, in Alamo Motor Lines v. … Lyon v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Wuchter v. Fitzgerald

    83 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1917

    You are not to consider what the plaintiff had to pay for board or what he had to pay for powder, but whatever the work was reasonably worth without regard to the contract price.” … J. 1411; Cozad v. Elam, 115 Mo. App. 136 ( 91 S. W. 434 ); Reifschneider v. Beck, 148 Mo. App. 725 ( 129 S. W. 232 ); Edward Thompson Co. v. Kollmeyer, 46 Ind. App. 400 ( 92 N. E. 660 ); Massey v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bryant v. Seagraves

    270 Or. 16 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1974

    Bryant’s expert testified that a cruise he conducted shortly before trial indicated that approximately 465,000 board feet were then standing on the property. … Jones, 258 Or 468 , 483 P2d 815 (1971); Hammons v. Schrunk, 209 Or 127 , 305 P2d 405 (1956); Milton v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.