Case law

Joy v. Palethorpe

77 Or. 552 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 13, 1915

In this state an estoppel of this character must be pleaded: Rugh v. Ottenheimer, 6 Or. 231 ( 25 Am. Rep. 513 ); Remillard v. Prescott, 8 Or. 37 ; Bays v. Trulson, 25 Or. 109 ( 35 Pac. 26 ); First Nat. Bank v. … McDonald, 42 Or. 257 ( 70 Pac. 901 ); Haun v. Martin, 48 Or. 304 ( 86 Pac. 371 ); Ashley v. Pick, 53 Or. 410 ( 100 Pac. 1103 ). 4.

Brownfield v. Houser

30 Or. 534 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1897

Woodruff, 10 Or. 133 ; Wormington v. Pierce, 22 Or. 606 , 30 Pac. 450 ; Sherman v. Bellows, 24 Or. 553 , 34 Pac. 549 ; State v. Pennoyer, 26 Or. 205 , 25 L. R. A. 862, 37 Pac. 906 ; Dorothy v. … W. 72 ; County of Wayne v. Randall, 43 Mich. 137 , 5 N. W. 75 ; Cox v. Mayor of New York, 103 N. Y. 518 , 9 N.

State of Oregon v. Kader

201 Or. 300 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 12, 1954

State v. Magers, 36 Or 38 , 58 P 892 , and State v. … State v. Magers, supra, and State v.

State v. Preston

103 Or. 631 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1922

When the legislature declared what motor vehicles should not be affected by the act, those not within the exception were without it: Commonwealth *635 v. Summerville, 204 Pa. St. 300, 304 ( 54 Atl. 27 ); Brown v. … Massachusetts Bonding Co., 89 Or. 141 ( 172 Pac. 95 ), and authorities there cited; Felt v. Felt, 19 Wis. 193, 208, 212 ; Lewis’ Suth. Stat. Const., § 491.

Neppach v. Norval

116 Or. 593 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1925

Davis , 168 Mich. 398 ( 134 N.W. 463 ) ( semble ); Price v. Kane , 112 Mo. 412 ( 20 S.W. 609 ); Curd v. Brown , 148 Mo. 82 ( 49 S.W. 990 ) ( semble ); Bartlett v. Bartlett , 15 Neb. 593 ( 19 N.E. 691 ); Bailey v. … BEAN, BROWN and BELT, JJ., concur.

Lakeshore Gardens Drainage District v. California-Oregon Power Co.

162 Or. 26 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 16, 1939

Co. v. Dollar Co., 132 Or. 453, 472 , 285 P. 244, 351 . … Holder v. Harris, et al., 121 Or. 432, 441 , 248 P. 145 , 253 P. 869 , 870, and authorities there cited.

Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. Oregon & California Railroad

117 Or. 438 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1926

To the same effect, see Brown v. Moorhead, 8 Serg. & R. (Pa.) 569, where the deed was of one tract only and the vendor had agreed to convey two tracts. This case is governed by the same principle. … Brown and Coshow, JJ., did not sit in this case. Burnett, J., concurs in the result. Band, J., dissents.

Morrison v. Kandler Et Ux

215 Or. 489 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1958

Howard v. Jackson, 213 Or 447 , 324 P2d 757 ; Zumstein v. Stockton et ux., supra; Grider v. Turnbow, supra; Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co., Inc., supra; Kemmerer v. … Howard v. Jackson, supra; Zumstein v. Stockton et ux., supra; Nielsen v. Baldridge, 173 Or 555 , 146 P2d 754 ; Grider v. Turn *501 bow, supra; McCracken v.

Inverarity v. Stowell

10 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1882

(Phillips on Mechanics’ Liens, sec. 176; Belding v. Cushing, 1 Gray, 579 .) … (Moore v. Floyd, 4 Or., 261 ; Kelly v. Brown, 17 Abb. Pr., 229 ; Bennett v. Vansycle, 18 N. Y., 484 .) But such is not the case here.

Smith v. Dunn

165 Or. 418 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 29, 1940

Appellant relies upon Hunt v. First National Bank, 102 Or. 398 , 202 P. 564 . … Clearly, Hunt v.

McNary v. Wrightman

32 Or. 573 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1898

Williams, the then owner thereof, lots 1, 2, 13 and 14, and the west half of lot 12, in Cartwright’s Second Addition to the City of Salem, and placed a value thereon of $6,500, but this appraisement was increased by the state board … Mayhew, 26 Cal. 655 ; Baber v. McLellan, 30 Cal. 135 ; Hudgin v. Hudgin’s Executor, 6. Grat. 320 [ 52 Am. Dec. 124 ]; Grant v. Lloyd, 12.

Franck v. Blazier

66 Or. 377 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 22, 1913

L.), should not be disturbed: Sun Dial Ranch v. *381 May Land Co., 61 Or. 205 ( 119 Pac. 758 ); Brown & Co. v. Sharkey, 58 Or. 480 ( 115 Pac. 156 ). … E. 872, 873 ); Porter v. Woodruff, 36 N. J. Eq. 174.

Mendez v. Walker

272 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1975

Linster v. East Lake Health Resort, 143 Or 63, 64 , 18 P2d 592 (1933); Brown v. Drake, 103 Or 607, 611 , 205 P 1002 , 210 P 710 (1922); *605 Stivers v. Byrkett, 56 Or 565, 570 , 108 P 1014 , 109 P 386 (1910); Long v.

Larkins v. Richardson

263 Or. 444 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1972

In Brown v. Grimm, 258 Or 55, 59-60 , 481 P2d 63 (1971), and Setser v. … The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. (1) Bliss v. Carter, 26 Mich App 177 , 182 NW2d 54 (1970); Funke v. Paist, 356 Pa 594, 52 A2d 655 (1947); Richardson v.

Wriglesworth v. Doyle

244 Or. 468 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1966

Dutton v. Donald M. Drake Co., 237 Or 419, 425 , 391 P2d 761 (1964). … The above language was quoted with approval in a federal tort claims case, Brown v. United States, 122 F Supp 166 (D N Mex 1954).

Klovdahl v. Springfield

81 Or. 168 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 11, 1916

Co., 64 Or. 1 ( 128 Pac. 989); Equi v. Olcott, 66 Or. 213 ( 133 Pac. 775 ); Purdin v. Hancock, 67 Or. 164 ( 135 Pac. 515 ); Barnard v. Houser, 68 Or. 240 ( 137 Pac. 227 ); Templeton v. … Gordon, 6 Or. 175 ; House v. Jackson, 24 Or. 89 ( 32 Pac. 1027 ); Hayden v. Brown, 33 Or. 221 ( 53 Pac. 490 ); Bogard v. Barhan, 52 Or. 121 ( 96 Pac. 673 , 132 Am. St. Rep. 676 ); St. Dennis v.

Fisk v. Leith

137 Or. 459 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1931

No. 7 v. … J., Brown and Campbell, JJ., concur. *466 Former opinion modified on rehearing October 6, 1931

Spencer v. City of Portland

114 Or. 381 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1925

A. 115) ; McQuaid v. Portland & V. Ry. Co., 18 Or. 237 ( 22 Pac. 899 ); Kelly v. Multnomah County, 18 Or. 356 ( 22 Pac. 1110 ); Shattuck v. Kincaid, 31 Or. 379 ( 49 Pac. 758 ). … And,.in a case of doubt, it ought to turn the scale: Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 571 ( 28 L. Ed. 1080 , 5 Sup. Ct. Rep. 648, see, also, Rose’s U. S. Notes).

State v. Williamson

307 Or. 621 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1989

See State v. Wolfe, 295 Or 567, 571 , 669 P2d 320 (1983); State v. Kennedy, supra, 290 Or at 502 . … See State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 278 n 6, 721 P2d 1357 (1986).

Savage Adm'x v. Palmer

204 Or. 257 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1955

Seotchlight signs were described as signs which have a metal on the face of the board which reflects light through the paint so that an approaching car can see the sign. … . *273 Defendant relies upon Hall v. Brown, 102 Or 389 , 202 P 719 ; Ragan v. MacGill, 134 Or 408 , 292 P 1094 ; Barnes v. Davidson, 190 Or 508 , 266 P2d 289 ; Adkins v.